привет

Channel
РЕСТ — ⁱⁿᶠᵒ 𝙎𝙐𝙉𝙔𝙀𝙊𝙉𝙄𝙇𝙇``☘
@sunyeonill
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
157subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002539490466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sunyeonill |
| Description | ㅤ— 𝚕𝚎𝚝'𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚎 𝚠𝚑𝚘 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝙎𝙪𝙣𝙮𝙚𝙤𝙣𝙞𝙡𝙡 〞 𝒪 𝑤𝑛 - @whosyeo ⁰⁴·⁰⁶·²⁵ ミント 𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝗯𝘆 : @lishapohelp☘ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sunyeonill |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 157 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 157 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 20 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 11
- Links
- 7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 11 | 28.9% | |
| 🎄 | 8 | 21.1% | |
| 🍾 | 7 | 18.4% | |
| custom 5210807477746041064 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5280948206404926314 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| custom 5291971158365724840 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 5.26% | |
| custom 5366500849679885193 | 1 | 2.63% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 27 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
ну чтож.. что лучше? сзрп
- оставить этот флуд31%
- открыть тут новый флуд52%
- открыть тут кф17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🍾1🎄1🕊1
ещё бы чуть-чуть я бы сюда ничайно свою геолокацию кинул бы..
🎄2🍾1🕊1
Sticker, posted without a caption
может закрыть этот флуд и сделать тут другой проект..? сзрп
- да55%
- нет45%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🎄3🍾2🕊2
Sticker, posted without a caption
ох ема
мы решили поднять подписку сз на 250+ ごめんなさい ( у кого 230-40 - остаётся) ☘ • разрыв с - @number1info , @info_xienn , @Kjrnark , @SW33TMUFF , @pecenkaflood , @Eclatantfloood , @extra11fl , @SIWFISSflood , @purringsflood , @lunar_labubu_info , @mery4ssembly . а так же разрыв с - @angel_info_f , @Hyunryufloodoff , @skylandernier , @emberglow_info , @killssflood_info , @narlyflood , @ayumii_info , @vallerflood , @Hikari…
🍾1🕊1
Sticker, posted without a caption
ищем админа по строчкам и админа по чату☘ писать:: @whosyeo сзрп
сзрп
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sunyeonill. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ну чтож.. что лучше? сзрп
- оставить этот флуд31%
- открыть тут новый флуд52%
- открыть тут кф17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
может закрыть этот флуд и сделать тут другой проект..? сзрп
- да55%
- нет45%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 27 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,059,275 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@angel_info_f · 471 post[ 🔐 ]🩸 А̝Y͛U⃫M͟͟I̐ \ ᶦᶰᶠᵒ ¡!
@ayumii_info · 731 post𝐄𝐂𝐋𝐀𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐓 🔒
@Eclatantfloood · 751 post🔒𝙀𝙈𝘽𝙀𝙍𝙂𝙇𝙊𝙒ˊˊ 𝘧𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘥 ⁱⁿᶠᵒ
@emberglow_info · 821 postпереход
@Everskiez_lovee · 111 post❯̸⃟𖤍𝐄̷̚𝐗̶𝐓̷𝐑̏𝐀̷𝐋̱
@extra11fl · 431 post히 Hiƙɑr𝐢𝐢 ⸝⸝⸝
@HikariiINFO · 2621 postРЕСТ. 𝐻𝑌𝑈𝑁𝑅𝑌𝑈 𝐹𝐿𝑂𝑂𝐷
@Hyunryufloodoff · 841 postЗакрыты !! INFO 𝗫𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗡 𝗙𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗗🇺🇸
@info_xienn · 3021 postВЫХОДНЫЕ. ≠ˋ₭ᴀ̄ᴊᴇ̂𝐑ᴀ̂Ỵ͋͢ø.
@Kjrnark · 1391 post꤈μ𐌽คʀ Ƚꤌʙሀ𝘣𝕦 𝒾ꤙ⨍̶o̶
@lunar_labubu_info · 1101 post⌗﹒𝗆𝖾𝗿𝗒┆ā𝗌𝗌𝟹𝗺𝖻!𝗒
@mery4ssembly · 291 post夜 NARLY . z z . fl0Od
@narlyflood · 761 postзакрыты ᯏ⁺ NUMBER INFO ꢾ𓍢ִ໋
@number1info · 601 post@ • 𝗣𝗘𝗖𝗘𝗡𝗞𝗔 . в чистках не участвуем
@pecenkaflood · 1291 post⌗ թurr𝕚nᧁ'ׁׅׅܻ݊꯱ ₊ fׄℓ𑄝𑄝d ྀི𓈒 ׅ
@purringsflood · 6041 postサク S̠I̵ͫW̛̦F̴I͙S̴̈S̑ – [ 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮 ] 🔒
@SIWFISSflood · 581 post+285 ׄᧃִׄⲃִບִׄɬׁ ִⲙִׄׄ𐐼ɸִɸִִບׄн *친절
@SW33TMUFF · 1141 post(закрыты)𝘃𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗱 / 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼
@vallerflood · 631 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@sunyeonill named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“РЕСТ — ⁱⁿᶠᵒ 𝙎𝙐𝙉𝙔𝙀𝙊𝙉𝙄𝙇𝙇``☘” (@sunyeonill), 157 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sunyeonill.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.