Drip drip drip Спасибо за звёздочку🌱
custom 529851233342799208426custom 52987157602590046617custom 52985237365661714936

Channel
@sunfloroj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
260subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002163061980 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sunfloroj |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sunfloroj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 260 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 260 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (17 May 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,685 |
| Reactions total | 376 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
680 reactions across 13 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5298512333427992084 | 81 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5244931894855891383 | 79 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5442939473568486210 | 75 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5427117827662319287 | 44 | 6.47% | |
| custom 5298523736566171493 | 43 | 6.32% | |
| custom 5373092937284464967 | 39 | 5.74% | |
| custom 5445349074775594528 | 37 | 5.44% | |
| custom 6089123930386209083 | 33 | 4.85% | |
| custom 5386576991405224406 | 31 | 4.56% | |
| custom 5364339652201307046 | 30 | 4.41% | |
| custom 5427193552230701854 | 20 | 2.94% | |
| custom 5298715760259004661 | 19 | 2.79% | |
| custom 6088974151991698322 | 15 | 2.21% | |
| custom 5388958022489891627 | 12 | 1.76% | |
| custom 5242585232099538951 | 11 | 1.62% | |
| custom 5244454693924534463 | 11 | 1.62% | |
| custom 5445118168743826011 | 11 | 1.62% | |
| custom 5384180618697404709 | 10 | 1.47% | |
| custom 5444921991817612469 | 10 | 1.47% | |
| custom 5244846270387878299 | 9 | 1.32% | |
| 10 further kinds | 60 | 8.82% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 680reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sunfloroj. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 May 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Drip drip drip Спасибо за звёздочку🌱
custom 529851233342799208426custom 52987157602590046617custom 52985237365661714936
Маленький соц опрос 🤏 Насколько вы милостивы по отношению ко всяким жучкам-паучкам которые спавнятся в вашем доме ? Благородно сохраняете жизнь или нет пощады тем, кто вторгается в ваше пространство ?
custom 529852373656617149320custom 52985123334279920847custom 52987157602590046617
wip
custom 529851233342799208441custom 52985237365661714939custom 52987157602590046615
👁️
custom 544534907477559452837custom 538418061869740470910custom 52985237365661714938custom 52985123334279920847
🐉 Лотерея 🐉 на портретик с лёгким фоном Условия: 🌼Подписка 🌼Порядковый номер в комментарии Опционально: 🌼За репост в активный тгк можете поставить дополнительный номер Итоги 10.08.2026 🌼Победитель будет выбран по номеру с помощью рандомайзера
custom 608912393038620908333custom 542719355223070185420custom 608897415199169832215custom 54699886664975946365
Finished YCH 💧
custom 524493189485589138343custom 52444546939245344637custom 53889580224898916277custom 54451181687438260116
Синичка
custom 524493189485589138336custom 53889580224898916275custom 54451181687438260115custom 52444546939245344634
Anddd birthday gift for RinCipher💙
custom 544293947356848621033custom 52425852320995389517custom 54449219918176124694custom 54454112744919746744
Digital art who ? ☹️
custom 544293947356848621042custom 54449219918176124696custom 52425852320995389514custom 54454112744919746743
Traditional art who ?
custom 542711782766231928744
Tobias Lilja — Togetherness I
custom 537309293728446496739custom 52107698881922548756custom 52111640201611361696custom 53595652763607470335
Recent collab YCH templates ✨ I must confess: i do not care if i type my nickname wrong, but i won't calm down until i’ve double-checked the co-author’s nickname five times to make sure i spelled it correctly🚬
custom 538657699140522440631custom 52448462703878782999custom 53977627054466796039custom 53706905000828107343
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @sunfloroj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 28,468 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝕊𝕦𝕟𝕗𝕝𝕠𝕣𝕠𝕛” (@sunfloroj), 260 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sunfloroj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.