Channel
@sundialprotocol
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
69subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002717309435 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sundialprotocol |
| Description | Official Sundial Protocol Telegram Channel https://x.com/SundialProtocol https://www.sundialprotocol.com/ |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sundialprotocol |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 69 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 69 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
98 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 52 | 53.1% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 21.4% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 20.4% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 2.04% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.02% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.02% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2025 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
☀️ Want to hear more about our newest product, Alchemy? One of our Senior Developers, Sam Delaney, and co-founder of Charms, Andrew Throuvalas, are about to hop on the Space below and explain exactly how it works and our next steps! Jump on below to hear more ⬇️ https://x.com/i/spaces/1RKZzzqWAqaKB
🔥4
Happy Wednesday! Check out our new poll on X 👉 https://x.com/SundialProtocol/status/2059624138617029050?s=20
❤1🎉1
We had a great discussion on the Sundial audit with Hacken yesterday! If you missed it, make sure to check out the recording 👉 https://x.com/i/spaces/1mGPaLzYovjJN?s=20
❤1👍1🔥1
The X Space is just starting.
👍3
A good audit is more than a checklist; it's part of building secure and trustworthy systems from the outset☀️ So join us later today at 11:00 EST for an X Space with Hacken as we discuss the recent audit process and what robust security standards look like for Bitcoin-native infrastructure🛡 Set a reminder and bring your questions 👉 https://x.com/i/spaces/1mGPaLzYovjJN?s=20
🔥5
Hacken has completed its audit of the Sundial Testnet and our BTC Yield Lockers☀️ Check out our X post to learn more and see the details for the X space coming next week: https://x.com/SundialProtocol/status/2054842228825117057?s=20
🔥6🙏2🏆1
Sundial Protocol is heading to BTC Vegas🎰 We’ll be in Las Vegas for one of the key gatherings in the Bitcoin ecosystem, engaging with builders focused on where Bitcoin-native infrastructure is heading next⚙️ If you’re attending, we’d be glad to connect in person!🤝 Full post here: https://x.com/SundialProtocol/status/2047240671526834179?s=20 See you in Vegas🎲
🔥3👍1
https://luma.com/ParisBlockchainWeek
👍2
🚀 Big news from Sundial Protocol! Out of 1,000+ startups, Sundial has been selected as one of the Top 12 for Paris Blockchain Week’s Start in Block competition 🇫🇷 We’ll be presenting live at the Carrousel du Louvre on April 15–16, joining a select group of teams building the next layer of digital asset infrastructure. 👉 Check out our X post here: https://x.com/SundialProtocol/status/2038966288031068531
🔥7❤3👏1
From the sundial to Bitcoin, we’re making the invisible visible and the unused usable✨ Read more on X: https://x.com/SundialProtocol/status/2029138917786570880?s=20
👍4❤3
Institutional allocators are recalibrating, not abandoning, crypto in this market correction📊 Sheldon Hunt, CEO of Sundial, is featured in BeInCrypto discussing how professional investors are prioritising simplicity and risk‑aligned Bitcoin exposure over speculative activity ⚖️ Read the full feature: beincrypto.com/institutions-responding-crypto-correction
👍5❤2🔥2
Check out the new article on our website to read about the conferences Sundial has recently attended!☀️ Link👇 https://www.sundialprotocol.com/news/Consensus-and-Liquidity
❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sundialprotocol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 425,430 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sundial Protocol” (@sundialprotocol), 69 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sundialprotocol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.