Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝑺𝒖𝒏 𝑨𝒓𝒉𝒊𝒗

@sunArhiv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

72subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001894833975
TypeChannel
Username@sunArhiv
CreatedBetween 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sunArhiv

Growth

727 August 2026 — 72 subscribers9 August 2026 — 72 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71–73 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 22:4772no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:1372first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
386.1%
avg views ÷ 72 subscribers
Avg views / post
278
1 post measured
Reaction rate
15.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held17 (13 June 202622 July 2026)
Views total278
Reactions total42
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
248
Videos
3
Links
35

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

269 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53236550547989093598130.1%
custom 51882197078654514325119.0%
custom 51885701041823611574215.6%
🕊3312.3%
3211.9%
custom 54292757695556754243011.2%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
283
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 17 we hold a reading for · 41%
Most on one post
106
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sunArhiv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTC278 views42 reactions55 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Велика повноцінна ілюстрація від архіву це не міф, це сталося. Мені дуже подобається начебто, добра частина роботи робилась в одну ніч, коли гуділа тривога. Буду щаслива отримати нову кількість підписників і добити одразу 100. Зможете?)

custom 518821970786545143216custom 532365505479890935910custom 54292757695556754247custom 518857010418236115762🕊1

10 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC129 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Культурно спіженно. Пробачте, я влаштувалась на роботу, тому не багато часу на малювання

5 Jul 2026, 19:29 UTC139 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Клянусь, нормальні арти скоро будуть. У мене в планах велика повноцінка #лікарнятварин

custom 53236550547989093596custom 51882197078654514324custom 518857010418236115742🕊1

26 Jun 2026, 12:21 UTC164 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Можете мені позадавати мені питання чи написати якусь дурницю, поки я на новий арт налаштовуюсь: @sunArhivAnonbot відповіді будуть в щп ☂️

4🕊1custom 51885701041823611571custom 54292757695556754241

22 Jun 2026, 06:19 UTC212 views32 reactions30 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Му babyy💔 #сонце #юпітер

custom 532365505479890935911🕊6custom 54292757695556754246custom 51885701041823611575custom 518821970786545143231

21 Jun 2026, 13:23 UTC173 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🎉🎉🎉🎉

custom 51882197078654514325custom 51885701041823611573custom 532365505479890935931🕊1custom 54292757695556754241

20 Jun 2026, 09:35 UTC179 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Про реакції пам'ятаємо

custom 51885701041823611573custom 53236550547989093593custom 54292757695556754243🕊1

20 Jun 2026, 09:21 UTC253 views28 reactions30 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🔤🔤🔤🔤😉 Я коливаюсь. Я не знаю. Чи я люблю, чи я кохаю. Твої очі — зелені вогні, Що світять і гаснуть мені. Ти близька і далека водночас, Наче міський вечірній час. Електричний ліхтар. Трамвай. Не треба. Прощай. (М.Семенко) ✨✨✨✨💥🔥✨✨✨✨ Collab with Totoshka 💄 #венера #марс

🕊11custom 53236550547989093597custom 51885701041823611576custom 542927576955567542421custom 51882197078654514321

20 Jun 2026, 08:52 UTC146 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Сьогодні арт, готуйте ножі та виделки

custom 51885701041823611572custom 53236550547989093592custom 54292757695556754241

17 Jun 2026, 14:49 UTC216 views45 reactions106 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

❗ NSFW BRIGHT COLORS Молодці, наступного разу так просто не відкупитесь 🤗

custom 532365505479890935916custom 5188219707865451432127custom 51885701041823611575🕊3custom 54292757695556754242

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @sunArhiv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 823,434 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑺𝒖𝒏 𝑨𝒓𝒉𝒊𝒗” (@sunArhiv), 72 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sunArhiv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.