Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

summonerx2 🪲🪱🐞

@summonerx2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

33subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002221502596
TypeChannel
Username@summonerx2
Descriptionрисую картинки
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/summonerx2

Growth

336 August 2026 — 33 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:0133no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:2233first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.8%
avg views ÷ 33 subscribers
Avg views / post
26.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (1 February 202630 July 2026)
Views total80
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
67
Videos
2
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

113 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥4842.5%
3329.2%
custom 54090317332637404322522.1%
custom 520858463030689524065.31%
custom 521087730532434258510.885%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
136
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
134
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @summonerx2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 February 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC25 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

вопрос на миллион - нужна ли регулярная рубрика "что отчебучили игроки на моей днд-партии"?

  1. не 😔0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jul 2026, 12:52 UTC28 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @entelechy_zinePhoto

«Герои. Так называют их сказители, но я предпочитаю звать их свободными душами.» Просим внимания, дорогие зрители! [ Переменные эксперимента ] ›› Художники: ✧ AleguraSensei ✧ alexroxysam ✧ Allistrana ✧ ciona ✧ Dein Zyanid ✧ dingir ✧ Kaisashes ✧ lotreckk ✧ melonhooves ✧ OKUNIE ✧ pakhtakor ✧ pepper ✧ saibera ✧ SERENiTY ✧ seripu ✧ Sheralt ✧ summonerx2 ✧ Takasa ✧ VVieta ✧ zenzen ✧ данте ✧ ВЕТЕРОООК ✧ Котан Шрёдингера

4

28 Jul 2026, 12:52 UTC27 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

а тут я! вот тут я!!! С ЛИКУРГОМ МОИМ ЛЮБИМЫМ...

3

2 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTC77 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

кукла ищет себя 🤎 сидит думает недовольный, что-то не устроило кто первый разберёт символизм растений, изображённых на узорах, тот молодец и того я похвалю я обязательно распишу лор моих персонажей........ 🩶

❤‍🔥62

4 Jun 2026, 03:51 UTC102 views10 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

о скорби 🖤 я прожила почти четверть века (о как пафосно звучит для 23летнего пиздюка) и долго думала, что у меня это испытать в полной мере не выйдет. за все прожитые года не получалось -- мне помогает моя собственная вера и принятие смерти. я рано сообразила, что люди помирают и предполагала сценарии для каждого из моего круга, чтобы быть готовой заранее. да и отдохнуть от житухи мирской не так уж плохо, не? ан не

❤‍🔥7custom 54090317332637404323

3 Jun 2026, 03:51 UTC176 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

"Он не спал в ту ночь. Смотрел, как Оскар дышит, как ресницы дрожат во сне, как губы шевелятся, будто он разговаривает. И знал: что бы ни случилось, он больше не позволит никому причинить ему боль. Никогда. Потому что Оскар — его. И он — Оскара." 🕊 с днём рождения меня! 🦊 мне уже 23 года! этот год был лучше прошлого, чему я рада. беру так сказать житуху в свои руки и жоско ебашу. картинка с самыми нежными мне на де

10

27 May 2026, 15:33 UTC90 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ребята я кстати родилась в понедельник! мне уже 23 года! но я так ЖОСКО активно проводила дни что даже пост забыла написать об этом. скоро все будет 🐈‍⬛

❤‍🔥8

19 May 2026, 12:10 UTC105 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

сделала жоска надо что-то умное написать наверное... пусть будет предыстория картинки. идея ее у меня появилась давно, когда мне было пиздец как тяжело. и начинала я ее рисовать, когда мне было очень плохо морально. изначально у нее вообще должно быть название "страх, стыд, вина, надежда", но в процессе мне вроде стало легче? я могла оставить название "надежда", однако последнее время это слово почему-то перестало и

custom 54090317332637404325❤‍🔥3custom 52108773053243425851

11 May 2026, 10:08 UTC100 viewsread 11 August 2026

АХУЕТЬ НЕФОР ЭТА ЧЕ ТАКОЕ................... . . . . . . 😐

11 May 2026, 09:51 UTC98 views3 reactions134 Starsread 11 August 2026

ой, звездочка!! 🥺 спасибо большое, это очень мило с:

❤‍🔥3

10 May 2026, 17:10 UTC103 views9 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

то ли одиночество, то ли диссоциация. сама так и не решила 🤩

custom 540903173326374043263

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @summonerx2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

вопрос на миллион - нужна ли регулярная рубрика "что отчебучили игроки на моей днд-партии"?

  1. не 😔0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Feb 2026, 16:25 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

голосование за лучшее событие в моей днд-кампании

  1. выбросили 1 на д100 в первой же катке30%
  2. влетели в долг на 80к голды (я сама в ахуе)30%
  3. заключили договор с феей на обычной бумаге без печатей и магического подтверждения10%
  4. заключили контракт с самым сексапильным существом в моей ролевой (Тау)10%
  5. устроили ЭКСПЕДИЦИЮ 67 прямо в центр леса с аномалиями пачкой из трех персонажей третьего уровня20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 713,716 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“summonerx2 🪲🪱🐞” (@summonerx2), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/summonerx2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.