Channel
@sulmm88
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
572subscribers
+302 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004236293350 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sulmm88 |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 5 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sulmm88 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 572 | -38 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 610 | +340 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:22 | 270 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (5 June 2026 – 5 September 2026) |
| Views total | 651 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 03:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎰 🎉成都学院祝同学们天天开心🎉 📮 参与条件： 🎫 加入-碎碎念 🎫 加入-成都学院日报社 🎫 加入-成都学院（中转群） └ 🔑 发送口令﹝天天开心﹞ 🎫 加入-成都学院 🎫 加入-成都学院已验证老师精选车库 🎫 加入-Doctor的诊断记录 ❗ 口令提示： 请先参与抽奖，再发送口令激活 🎁 奖品内容： 💰️ 苏念 单P 白嫖券 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： ❗️无用户名、炸号、中奖后退出群组或频道不予兑奖； ❗️中奖后需要在48小时内联系兑奖人兑奖，过时不兑换，不能转让； 🔋 人品加成：⚡️× 9 规则 📅 开奖日期：(北京时间) 2026年09月06日 18时00分00秒
还有位哦
Photo, posted without a caption
还有位哦
亲爱的有空位 可约哦🫶
今天开课咯
红休了哥哥们回来见😘
开课啦有空位 约课哥哥们认准唯一约课号 @sulmm8
天青色等烟雨 而我在等你
#苏念 @sulmm8 七点半，她开门的时候，屋子里已经暗下来了。白色的吊带，黑色的短裤，很简单，穿在她身上却不简单。重庆的女孩子，骨架子小，肉却会长，该细的地方细得好看，该圆的地方也圆得恰到好处。她赤着脚踩在地板上，脚踝细细的，涂着淡淡的指甲油。 我靠在沙发上抽烟，她说不抽，就坐在沙发对面的床上看着我。她很会说话，声音软软的，却句句都在点上。从重庆的火锅聊到她小时候在江边捉螃蟹，从最近的电影聊到各自的工作，气氛轻松得像认识了很久的老朋友。我抽烟的时候她就安静地看着，偶尔递个烟灰缸过来，体贴得不露痕迹。 后来不知道怎么的，就靠近了。吊带的带子很细，滑下来的时候几乎没有什么声响。手指碰到她腰间的时候，摸到了那一点点褶皱的皮肤，很薄很软，她说这是以前减肥太快留下的。我没说什么，只是低头亲了亲那里。她的身体微微颤了一下，然后伸手抱住了我。后来的一切发生得很自然，像夏天的雨，来得猛烈却不突兀。她的身体柔软而温热，…
❤2
【成都91修车学院】®专属报告 🔴基础信息 【妹子花名】：苏念 【妹子车牌】：@sulmm8 【验证留名】：奥特曼强奸怪兽 【验证时间】：6.7 【所在位置】：火车南站 【修车水费】：600P 【是否代聊】：本人 🟡硬件评价 【身高体重】：155/90 皮肤白净光滑，手感特别软 【妹子年龄】：24 【湿度紧度昆感】：蝴蝶/褐色，正常紧度湿度，阴唇上面留有面，下面挂过很干净 【人照评分】：8 【颜值评分】：好看小少妇，御姐气质 【凶器罩杯】：C，乳头乳晕正常大小，颜色淡褐色，手感特别软和水做的一样 🟢软件评价 【环境卫生】：交通方便，类似于公寓的小区很安全，房间整洁干净 【服务内容】：简单轻吻，舔胸，口，69，指划，女上，后入，正常体位 【机车行为】：无 🟣综合评价 【优点缺点】：好看有气质，有过生育，肚子上有疤痕 【性价比】： 8.5分/满分10.0分 【推荐程度】：8.5分/满分10.0分 评分标…
❤1
【成都研究所】 修车专用报告模版 基础信息👀成都研究所 【妹子花名】：#苏念 【妹子车牌】：@sulmm8 【验证留名】：卧龙（真人版） 【验证时间】：6.7 【所在位置】：火车南站 【修车水费】：6P 【是否代聊】： 代聊 硬件评价👀 【身高体重】：身高体重如何 158，无纹身，皮肤光滑 【妹子年龄】：24 【湿度紧度昆感】：蝴蝶b，毛量少。 【人照相似】：人照相似程度， 9分 （哪一张照片） 【颜值打分】：9（6分及格，8分班花，9分 小网红，碰见想要微信那种） 【凶器罩杯😍😍】：c 软件评价👀 【环境卫生】：出入方便，卫生干净 【服务内容】：比较健聊，小御姐颜值高，服务热情，口技很不错，不喊停一直口，蝴蝶b，水多多，女上很给力。 【机车行为】：不机车 综合评价👀 【优点缺点】：颜值高，喜欢聊天，服务可以。 【性价比】： 9分/满分10.0分 【推荐程度】：9分/满分10.0分 评分标准 8.5 6分为…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @sulmm88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“碎碎念” (@sulmm88), 572 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sulmm88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.