Channel
@sulleygems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
45subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001606184607 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sulleygems |
| Description | A journal of my alpha plays. Nothing in this channel is financial advice. DM always open for alfa @sulley0x, business inquires: @xcilliantg https://twitter.com/0xSulley on Twitter. Be wary of imposters! |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sulleygems |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 45 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 45 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
29 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 19 | 65.5% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 13.8% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 10.3% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 6.90% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2023 to 18 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$HEMULE 📍@sulleygems This is the szn when u need to buy and sit on your hand with the winner. How to detect winner? Just checking its volume and you'll figure out. Just in less than a day and the volume of $HEMULE has already been 22m. Even Pepe cant do this in its 1st day on this szn. Higher 🤫 Chart: https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x672fefac7f6e3017d9a2f1c14fe048191a24ce14 TG: https://t.me/HemulePortal
🔥3
$HEMULE 📍@sulleygems 3X+ 🔥 4m -> 14m "This cat is newly found, not larp, so probably send" 👀
$HEMULE 📍@sulleygems Vitalik's cat, posted by his mom on ig, founder's pet narrrative seems strong rnow, just checking the volume you'll see it. > CA renounced, LP burnt, 0/0 > Bottom formed and trading around 4m atm This cat is newly found, not larp, so probably send, DYOR Chart: https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x672fefac7f6e3017d9a2f1c14fe048191a24ce14 TG: https://t.me/HemulePortal
$BIT 📍️️️️️️@sulleygems Grok's cat > CA renounced, LP burnt, 0/0 Will gamble this with entry at 300k if it retraces, definitely send. Chart: https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x21dc711c0f146c4f606f36986eeeb61ed513a2f0 TG: https://t.me/Bit_ERC20
❤1
$BYTE 📍@sulleygems 30X+ 🔥 300k -> 10m "If this can survive through ded hours, probably send" 👀
$BYTE 📍@sulleygems 8X 🔥, $300k -> $2.4m
🔥3
$BEAR (Avax) 📍@sulleygems 7.5m 🔥 -- Told you all that i'll find my entry around $2-3m, and now it's only up since it. Print itt 🚀
$DMIND 📍@sulleygems 10m 🔥AI szn is happening Higher
$JONES 📍@sulleygems 2x 🔥 1m5; god candle in dead hours? Higher, much muchh higher!!! 🚀🚀🚀
🔥3👏2
Video, posted without a caption
$JONES 📍@sulleygems Aped this dip, this could be the next obv millions meme of Elons stuff. Why? - Elon's pool end, and he will post something about the result - #freealexjones is trending on X - Alex reinstated - Media post abt this, Alex tweet go viral... -> Many more to come. > CA renounced, LP burnt, 0/0 > Chart formed a nice dip => Definitely send to mils, no doubt. Chart: https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/…
🔥3❤2👍1
$DMIND 📍@sulleygems "Volume soon will be rotated back to the biggest narrative of this cycle 🤖 Higher" - 👀
🤯4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sulleygems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,427,286 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sulley Gems” (@sulleygems), 45 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sulleygems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.