Channel
@sulcis_iglesiente_ribelle
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
719subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001588263288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sulcis_iglesiente_ribelle |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sulcis_iglesiente_ribelle |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 719 | +3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 716 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 718 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 719 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 719 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
59 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 50.8% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 25.4% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 5.08% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 5.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ci risiamo, per l'ennesima volta il nostro territorio è stato identificato per un grosso investimento: un enorme data center per IA da installare nelle ex miniere di Nuraxi Figus della Carbosulcis. Ora, il tema non è tanto il fatto di essere il popolo del 'NO a tutto' come dicono alcuni, ma di essere le persone che in un territorio ci vivono e ci vivranno, e che dovrebbero avere il diritto alla propria autodeterminaz…
👎3❤1👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
Qualche giorno fa un grosso incendio è divampato nella vallata che dal centro abitato di Domusnovas porta verso le grotte, verso gli ex siti minerari di Malacalzetta e Sa Duchessa. Il fuoco ha distrutto ettari e ettari di macchia, di pascoli e di alberi, lasciando un "nero panorama" degno di Isengard. Pare che le fiamme siano partite da una cabina elettrica dicono alcuni, da un palo della corrente dicono altri, inso…
❤2👎2
Oltre all'incontro di Gonnesa, segnaliamo sempre per questa sera anche questo incontro a Is Urigus, per discutere del contestato progetto di conversione della cava in discarica per rifiuti speciali!
STASERA A GONNESA ALLE 17!! assemblea pubblica per parlare dell’ennesimo progetto calato dall’alto nel nostro territorio. Contro ogni speculazione, il territorio è di chi lo vive!
❤2
In questi giorni regione e assessorato all'industria, dopo tante belle parole e finto interessamento, hanno beffato gli abitanti di Is Urigus confermando la validità della concessione mineraria a favore di Ekosarda srl - la quale, e non ne fa mistero, è intenzionata a trasformare la cava sita accanto al paese nell'ennesima discarica di rifiuti speciali. Di abuso in abuso, il destino del Sulcis sembra quello di divent…
❤3🤬3
Segnaliamo questa iniziativa sugli scritti dell'anarchico Luigi Galleani, questo venerdì ad Iglesias
❤4
Andiamo un po’ fuori provincia, ma rimaniamo in sardegna, nel nord est a Tavolara dove una società brasiliana vorrebbe costruire e privatizzare in riva al mare, usando una delle mosse di stile berlusconiano di questo Governo (cioè la trasformazione in Zes di tutto il meridione isole incluse). Mattone e cemento contro la crisi, ma quale crisi? E poi di chi? Come al solito gli interessi e i profitti non sarebbero per n…
❤5👍2
Ricordiamo stasera a Iglesias alle 18.30 la presentazione del libro “Ponitì a una party”! Ci vediamo lì
Questo venerdì ad Iglesias!
❤4
Segnaliamo questa iniziativa, domenica 28 giugno
❤3👍2
Dopo l'ok del ministero della cultura il parco eolico off shore davanti alle coste del Sulcis sembra essere più vicino alla realizzazione. Nella prima parte di questa rassegna stampa un riepilogo dei recenti fatti e delle maggiori criticità del progetto. https://www.sardegnaoltre.org/articles/via-libera-al-primo-maxi-parco-eolico-offshore-della-sardegna---
👎3🔥3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @sulcis_iglesiente_ribelle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sulcis - Iglesiente RIBELLE” (@sulcis_iglesiente_ribelle), 719 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sulcis_iglesiente_ribelle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.