Channel
@suizhuan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
62subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001431143564 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @suizhuan |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/suizhuan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 62 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 63 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 63 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 1 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
I love @realDonaldTrump as much as a straight man can love another man 说起直男之爱，只服这篇收录在《Interviews with History and Conversations with Power》的45年前采访。 Deng Xiaoping interviewed by Oriana Fallaci (1980) https://redsails.org/deng-and-fallaci/
“一则批评本身的质量和分量不够，二则抵抗批评的气势很盛。批评不多，却常被称为‘围攻’，被说成是‘打棍子’。其实倒是批评者被围攻，而被批评者却往往受到同情和保护。”他说：“有些同志对精神污染不闻不问，采取自由主义的态度，甚至认为是生动活泼，是‘双百’方针的体现。有些同志明知不对，但是不愿或不敢进行批评，怕伤了和气。” 太符合对某些人的刻板印象了，又是偏见加深的一天。
记者：我觉得很有意思的一句台词是，红辣椒说，梦和互联网在某种程度上是一回事。你认同这个观点吗？ 今 敏：我所写的是，互联网和梦有一个共同的特点，即激发被压抑的潜意识。我认为在日本、美国和其他互联网盛行的国家，人们可以匿名寻求或释放在线下不能言说的东西，就好像有一部分潜意识是无法控制的，而在互联网上浮现了出来。这很像梦。这可能是一个非常抽象的类比，但我一直认为当我们陷入梦境，或坐在电脑前与互联网对接时，也就进入了某种地下世界。我也认为这两幅图景有着共通之处。我的意思并不是分辨梦和互联网的好坏，我只是想说，在这两个世界里，有好也有坏，无法一概而论。 有人说在虚拟世界里，存在着不同的规则，或者是说那里发生了很多邪恶的事情，但我认为没有理由把虚拟世界和现实区分开来，因为现实就包括了虚拟世界。 记者：互联网是一面镜子，反射出了现实社会中一切好的和坏的东西。 今 敏：正是。 出自2006年，《红辣椒》入围了威尼斯电影节主竞赛单元后…
此文狗哨之响，让人不禁质疑纽人对自身读者群定位。 此文文笔尚算可人，可是用在了雕屎上。 有些人被架在火上烤，反而摇起了尾巴，为有用的自己鼓起了掌。终于不是“有用的傻瓜”了呢。 别担心，友谊的语言听不进去，但一定可以听进去暴力。 军事上得不到的东西，文化上一定得不到。只是冷战的仓促让有些人怀疑起世界的物质性。 https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/09/16/russias-espionage-war-in-the-arctic
“现在出发去机场，还能赶得上哭你爸头七。” 哇，缺乏睡眠竟能引出我如此的芬芳。
Do something serious and meaningful, and don’t go into the same field as your husband. 当Merle Goldman为博士论文选题时，其父母建议道：“做点严肃和有意义的事，不要和你丈夫选同一领域。” 其三女儿Karla Goldman回忆说，她妈当时是这么回答她姥爷姥姥的：“Marshall Goldman研究苏联，那我研究中国。” Karla Goldman自己的博士论文叫“Beyond the Gallery: The Place of Women in the Development of American Judaism” 她伴侣Kim Jaffee的博士论文叫“An Ecological Analysis of Low Birthweight in New York City: The Role of Residential …
Photo, posted without a caption
农业劳动者、农村人口、农村户籍人口、农村户籍人口高考录取情况。来源：《中国农民规模问题的不同判断、认知误区与治理优化》
关于奶加茶还是茶加奶 首先，奶是凉的，茶是热的。 其次，有钱人用的好瓷器受得住直冲热茶，或者说瓷器烫裂了他们不心疼。 所以，先往杯里加热茶后放凉奶的生活习惯，及隐含在其后的奢华生活方式，站在了鄙视链高处。 当我们在讨论生活方式的时候，其实是在炫耀。 现代的例子比如，你怎么开后备箱？ 用车钥匙，还是扣车标，还是抬脚？ 什么你说你不知道，都是司机开？ 什么你说你车没有后备箱，后面全是引擎？ 什么你没有车？ 再比如，不能外搭上街的瑜伽裤不配叫瑜伽裤。 买了瑜伽裤在健身馆有什么好炫耀的，人手三条，十个人不论男女有八个屁股勒得比你翘。瑜伽裤正确的使用场景只有街头和周五的办公室，塑造出“我不是在健身就是去健身路上”人设。 正如游戏中欧皇的游戏体验全靠非酋反衬一样，一桌人全说茶加奶、有司机、勤健身，可就产生不了丝毫优越感，是锦衣夜行，是无效社交，纯纯浪费茶会点心。
也许真诚的策略应该是，没无条件的爱过人，就不应要求他人无条件的爱。毕竟人不应要求一个没亲身去验证过的东西。
太奇怪了，“船到桥头自然直，比直男还直”和“船到桥头自然直，比直女还直”，听起来完全是两个意思。
“我在《还原与无限》中有一个基本判断，我们认同现代社会的一个基本原因是认同自由与平等，但在今天这两项现代性的承诺都落空了。刚才我们谈到信息茧房和数据后台，当我们的每一步行动都变成数据，当算法深入到我们全部的生活细节，我们的个人偏好成为商业开发对象的时候，自由的承诺难道不是落空了吗？平等的承诺也是如此。未来的不平等可能更多表现在你是被喂养信息的人，还是你是站在后台的人，这种不平等恐怕是一个绝对的不平等，不只是财富上的，而且是人格上的。未来的不平等还体现在，劳动在现代世界被认为是个人实现自我成长的途径，但今天的劳动变成了单纯的绩效追求和自我施加的暴力。我们每天的工作除了增长和谋生意义之外，没有了真正的自我实现的含义，这在未来恐怕也会加剧。”https://m.jiemian.com/article/8899422.html
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @suizhuan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“碎砖” (@suizhuan), 62 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/suizhuan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.