Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

*ੈ‧₊˚༺ѕυgα-ѕαη༻*ੈ‧₊˚

@suga_rs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003218713521
TypeChannel
Username@suga_rs
Created23 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/suga_rs

Growth

1711 Aug 2026, 16:17 — 17 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:01 — 17 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 16:1711 Aug 2026, 21:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16–18 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 21:0117no change
11 Aug 2026, 16:1717first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
246.3%
avg views ÷ 17 subscribers
Avg views / post
41.9
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
31.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (23 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total670
Reactions total126
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

126 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53955963540073760302217.5%
custom 51994675958535013372015.9%
custom 52039665955708998632015.9%
custom 51975978333807973661612.7%
custom 52042507806719734281411.1%
custom 5397669551901023291129.52%
custom 5204119792759378347118.73%
custom 5204275416604378501118.73%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC1 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @ReverseSide_net

#𝐔𝗇𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍 🤩 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝑒𝗿𝘀𝗲 𝑠𝗶𝗱𝗲 🔤 𝒄𝒂𝒏 𝓼𝒆𝒆 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝒂𝒈𝓪𝒊𝒏🔤 ׄ‌ ︶ㅤࣦ ‎⃟🤩 Д𝐲ш𝐚 вд𝐨в𝐨ль 𝐨тд𝐨𝐱н𝐲л𝐚 , в𝐨𝐜𝐜т𝐚н𝐨вил𝐚 𝐜в𝐨и 𝐜илы и г𝐨т𝐨ва п𝐩𝐨д𝐨лжить в𝐞𝐜ти 𝐤𝐚н𝐚л! ㅤׄ ⃨⏜᷼ 🌟🌟 𝓽 . 𝗆𝖾 ⋮ Шуга ⌢ Не пропустите самые свежие новости от данного саппорта ‼️

4 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «rest || *ੈ‧₊˚༺ѕυgα-ѕαη༻*ੈ‧₊˚»

4 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC10 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @ReverseSide_net

ᅠᅠ #𝐑𝖾𝗌𝗍 🤩 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝑒𝗿𝘀𝗲 𝑠𝗶𝗱𝗲 🔤𝒉𝒆 𝓻𝒆𝒇𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒆 𝓲𝓼 𝒔𝒐 𝐛𝐥𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐲 。。。 ⃝⃘🤩 ֵ 𝐊𝐚ж𝐞т𝐜я 𝐤𝐨м𝐲-т𝐨 𝐜𝐩𝐨чн𝐨 п𝐨н𝐚д𝐨бил𝐜я м𝐚-𝐚-𝐚л𝐞нь𝐤ий 𝐨тп𝐲𝐜𝐤 д𝐨 𝓞𝟵.𝓞𝟴❗️ ㅤׄ ⏜᷼💤 𝓽 . 𝗆𝖾 ⋮ Ш𝔂г𝓪 Просьба не беспокоить и не отписываться от саппорта🤩

31 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC64 views28 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🥹🥹😀𝚞 𝚗𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚞𝚡 𝚙𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚐â𝚝𝚎𝚊𝚞𝚡 ?🥹🥹 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🪽 Знаете, после последнего поста Шинономе-сана в его личном блоге мне стало не по себе... Этот человек, который следит за ним какой-то слишком странный. Я уже написал ему по поводу обращения в полицию и надеюсь, что он прислушается. Мало ли эта ситуация выйдет за рамки дозволенного. Не хотелось бы, что бы сам Шинономе-сан и его дочь пострадали... 🍮 🪽 Так, не будем о п

custom 53955963540073760306custom 53976695519010232916custom 52039665955708998635custom 52041197927593783474custom 51975978333807973663custom 51994675958535013372custom 52042754166043785012

30 Jul 2026, 21:53 UTC51 views16 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🥹🥹😀𝚞 𝚗𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚞𝚡 𝚙𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚐â𝚝𝚎𝚊𝚞𝚡 ?🥹🥹 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Q: Как относишься к Кюизину? 🪽 Кюизин... Кюизин... Ах, Шинономе-сан! На самом деле, он тот, на кого я равняюсь в кулинарном бизнесе, пусть у нас и разная стезя.🤍 Я восхищаюсь его ресторанами и частенько заглядываю туда — кухня просто отменная!🍮 🪽 Мы виделись всего один раз на каком-то банкете. Он выглядел таким серьёзным и напряжённым... И только тогда до меня дошло,

custom 51994675958535013373custom 52039665955708998633custom 53955963540073760303custom 51975978333807973662custom 52042507806719734282custom 53976695519010232912custom 52041197927593783471

28 Jul 2026, 20:24 UTC40 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🥹🥹😀𝚞 𝚗𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚞𝚡 𝚙𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚐â𝚝𝚎𝚊𝚞𝚡 ?🥹🥹 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Q: Вам нравится ваше занятие? А место, где оно находится? 🪽 Ох, очень извиняюсь за столь резкую пропажу! В последнее время поток людей в пекарне увеличился, а парочка сотрудников попросила отгул, пришлось и самому поработать немного за кассой.🍮 Думаю, вы уже заметили, что я довольно часто пишу о том, что горю этой идеей, так что да! Мне нравится моё занятие. Даже запар

custom 53955963540073760303custom 51975978333807973662custom 51994675958535013372custom 52039665955708998632custom 52042507806719734281custom 53976695519010232911

26 Jul 2026, 15:39 UTC36 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🥹🥹😀𝚞 𝚗𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚞𝚡 𝚙𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚐â𝚝𝚎𝚊𝚞𝚡 ?🥹🥹 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Q: Тяжело ли быть владельцем пекарни-кондитерской? 🪽 Я ждал этого вопроса! На самом деле, в начале было трудновато. Руководить целым заведением — это огромная ответственность🍮. В первые месяцы я вел дневник, в котором записывал все расходы на аренду помещения, оборудование, ингредиенты и всё прочее. Бизнес проседал, что и понятно. Я уходил в ужасные минусы, но сдаватьс

custom 51975978333807973663custom 51994675958535013373custom 52041197927593783472custom 52042507806719734282custom 53976695519010232912

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @suga_rs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,057,302 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“*ੈ‧₊˚༺ѕυgα-ѕαη༻*ੈ‧₊˚” (@suga_rs), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/suga_rs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.