https://t.me/MK888bot?start=21690364_B 点击就能玩的游戏。快来试试吧☺️☺️☺️

Channel
风景素材【孤注一掷】
@sucaifg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
225subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001981445292 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sucaifg |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sucaifg |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 225 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 225 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 2 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 December 2023 to 24 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
欢迎进群来玩: @OGFoo1
💓招商专员 💓 推广专员 💓 招聘专员 💓 招聘组长 💓招商部长 💓 海外招商 💓 商务接待 💓 会计专员 💓新媒体运营专员 💓公关专员 💓运营专员 💓商务助理 💓运营执行 💓英语商务 💓法务公关 💓逆向开发工程师 💓行政专员 💓推广专员 💓业务专员 💓厨师 💓吉隆坡助理 💓菲律宾助理 💓吉隆坡司机 💓客服专员 💓出纳专员 💓后勤专员 💓推广助理 💓报告编辑 💓代理发展专员 💓代理发展组长 💓监测专员 💓初级UI 💓文案专员 💓统筹财务专员
❤2
https://t.me/jiaoliumeishi
老色批们进群 @AV_33220
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
风景素材【孤注一掷】 pinned «感恩大家长久以来的对我的忽视 我很喜欢这个群 大家都是各玩各的 就是没有人鸟我 我也不想鸟你们 很温馨和谐的圈子互不打扰 我很欣慰 我删了很多的群 唯独你们我舍不得删 因为大家都展现出了真实的自己 色情 装逼 矫情 贪婪 伪善 两面三刀 笑里藏刀 道貌岸然 自私 虚荣 狡诈 虚伪 冷漠 龌龊 卑鄙 见利忘义 嫌贫爱富 厚颜无耻 还有超级加倍的阴阳怪气 我真的很喜欢你们 希望大家继续加油 我会一直和你们耗下去的 你们这群吊毛,爱你们吊毛🥙»
感恩大家长久以来的对我的忽视 我很喜欢这个群 大家都是各玩各的 就是没有人鸟我 我也不想鸟你们 很温馨和谐的圈子互不打扰 我很欣慰 我删了很多的群 唯独你们我舍不得删 因为大家都展现出了真实的自己 色情 装逼 矫情 贪婪 伪善 两面三刀 笑里藏刀 道貌岸然 自私 虚荣 狡诈 虚伪 冷漠 龌龊 卑鄙 见利忘义 嫌贫爱富 厚颜无耻 还有超级加倍的阴阳怪气 我真的很喜欢你们 希望大家继续加油 我会一直和你们耗下去的 你们这群吊毛,爱你们吊毛🥙
👍4
风景素材【孤注一掷】 pinned Deleted message
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
『 迷路就是走路的一部分。 在最深的绝望里,遇见最美丽的风景。』
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @sucaifg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,264,257 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“风景素材【孤注一掷】” (@sucaifg), 225 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sucaifg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.