Channel
@subwaysufersv3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
706subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002090890791 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @subwaysufersv3 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/subwaysufersv3 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 706 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 709 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:00 | 709 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 2 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
464 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5145906609188242647 | 178 | 38.4% | |
| 👍 | 70 | 15.1% | |
| 🤣 | 48 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5334636551735359504 | 33 | 7.11% | |
| custom 5291734595862018096 | 29 | 6.25% | |
| 🤡 | 22 | 4.74% | |
| 😐 | 21 | 4.53% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 4.31% | |
| 🤔 | 18 | 3.88% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 2.37% | |
| custom 5294510665153657908 | 8 | 1.72% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.431% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.431% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.431% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 464reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2024 to 5 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✈️ username: @busy Sold: 9,450 TON ($49,329) Buyer: UQDj…UH9_ Purchase Date: 5 October 2024 at 23:16 Fragment.com/username/busy 🔀 swap any @crypto w/ @transact
custom 51459066091882426478🤡3👎2🕊2🤣1
در پایان این بازار همه ما رو به خاطر خرید یوزرنیم با پول مسخره خواهند کرد. تصور کنید که یک شماره تلفن رو به صورت ان اف تی بخرید. همه شما واقعا رقت انگیز هستین
🤣11custom 514590660918824264711🤡6🤔5👍2👎2
Changes in global search At the end of August, many users noticed that the search algorithms in Telegram had changed. We tell you everything we know about this in the article https://tginfo.me/search-rules-change-2024-en/ #FAQ
custom 51459066091882426473👍1
Crypto analyst Benjamin Cowen predicts that Bitcoin could plummet by over 30% to around $42,000 by December if it fails to break through the upper trend line. This bearish prediction is based on his analysis of past price cycles, which suggests a potential downturn if Bitcoin doesn't sustain its upward momentum.
custom 51459066091882426475👍3🫡1
Tech Pioneer Amir Taaki Launches Alpha Version of DarkIRC In an exciting development for the crypto community, renowned Bitcoin developer Amir Taaki has unveiled the alpha version of DarkIRC, a messaging platform touted as “the most reliable anonymous chat in the world.” The creation of DarkIRC stems from Taaki's concerns about the oppressive censorship faced by cryptocurrency developers from authoritarian governme…
custom 51459066091882426474👍1🤡1
FBI Warns of $30 Million ICHCoin Scam Targeting Americans A troubling alert has been issued by the FBI regarding a major cryptocurrency scam linked to ICHCoin, which has resulted in the theft of approximately $30 million from victims throughout the United States. According to information from the FBI's Houston office, the scam has been preying on individuals since December 2023. Victims are attracted by false promis…
👍5custom 51459066091882426474❤1
xDD
custom 51459066091882426477👍2
You’ve been mentioned
🤣19👍11custom 51459066091882426474🤡3🤔1😢1
The upcoming TON unlocks, scheduled to begin in a month, are causing a great deal of anxiety amongst the community. While the exact impact is uncertain, many believe it will negatively affect the price, albeit potentially manageable. This sentiment stems from the belief that Pavel Durov will be unable to intervene to mitigate the price drop due to legal issues. His funds were reportedly confiscated during an ongoing …
custom 51459066091882426478👍3❤2custom 52917345958620180962😢1
🔜 While we patiently wait for Google to approve the latest Telegram update, let’s take a break for some nostalgia 👨🦳 ❤️ Here’s my eldest daughter instructing me on how to launch Telegram in the summer of 2013. She’s the real brain behind this whole thing, folks ☕️
custom 51459066091882426476🤔5❤3🤡1🫡1
Telegram collapsing as Ukraine collapses. Anyone notice the parallel?
👍11🤡8❤3🤔3custom 51459066091882426472custom 52917345958620180962
کیرم تو کونت
😐21custom 514590660918824264715🤣8❤6🤔4custom 52917345958620180964
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @subwaysufersv3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 695,813 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@subwaysufersv3 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Report | ریپورت” (@subwaysufersv3), 706 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/subwaysufersv3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.