Я хочу рисовать арты также быстро, как Донцова пишет детективные романы
custom 52606173215793168665custom 51886125169844290972custom 53100814420200874672custom 53075233594985918331custom 53530731498249992091

Channel
@suashinsposts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003734831390 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @suashinsposts |
| Description | Коллекция рисунков, сочинений и мнений. Проголосовать можно: https://t.me/boost/suashinsposts |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 15 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/suashinsposts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 26 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 26 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 25 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (15 May 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 159 |
| Reactions total | 43 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
223 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5260617321579316866 | 55 | 24.7% | |
| custom 5353073149824999209 | 53 | 23.8% | |
| custom 5188612516984429097 | 48 | 21.5% | |
| custom 5307523359498591833 | 47 | 21.1% | |
| custom 5310081442020087467 | 19 | 8.52% | |
| custom 5260317833509762259 | 1 | 0.448% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @suashinsposts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я хочу рисовать арты также быстро, как Донцова пишет детективные романы
custom 52606173215793168665custom 51886125169844290972custom 53100814420200874672custom 53075233594985918331custom 53530731498249992091
🤩Первый арт Найли! От художницы Палибей: @suashinsposts 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 ⠀Найля – второстепенная персонажка книги. Она апостолиса. У девушки выраженные заикания в речи и "расплывчатые" зрачки, из-за которых Найля плохо видит. Эти недуги были у неё ещё при жизни и она научилась с ними существовать. Найля родом из Англии 18 века. Умерла от болезни, на которую в то время не нашлось лекарств, в возрасте двадцати одного года. …
custom 53530731498249992093custom 52606173215793168662custom 51886125169844290971custom 53100814420200874671
🍎🍎🍎❤️ Это одна из старых работ, кстати, но сегодня что-то заставило меня наконец-то исправить тот плывущий рот, а вслед за этим ещё парочку исправлений и, естественно, атмосфера. Думаю, стало чуть лучше с учётом того, что я исправляла всё пальцем на телефоне. Извращение
custom 52606173215793168666custom 53100814420200874674custom 53075233594985918333custom 51886125169844290971
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟✨ Было у меня одним вечером настроение зимнее, так я и придумала небольшой сюжет для видео с песней "What was I made for? – Billie Eilish", но быстро перегорела +программа очень нужная слетела. Несмотря на это, один прекрасный кадр всё равно остался. Кстати, зимнее настроение никуда не делось 🤪
custom 53530731498249992096custom 51886125169844290972custom 53075233594985918332custom 52606173215793168661
Насколько нишево будет снять видео в гриме клоуна в ночной локации "под столом" под песню "Where Is My Mind – Pixies"?
custom 53530731498249992098custom 51886125169844290972custom 53075233594985918332custom 52606173215793168661
✨✨✨🌟🌟🌟 ✨✨✨ Одним вечером у меня появились деньги и желание узнать, как мой персонаж выглядит в глазах других художников. Мне безумно нравится эта работа, коммишку брала у https://t.me/itsgetworse . А пока рисую анимацию к песне Мерлина Мэнсона 🤩
custom 526061732157931686610custom 53530731498249992094custom 51886125169844290972custom 53075233594985918331
✨✨✨🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟✨✨✨ Вот она невероятно красива по задумке, но мне не хватает скилла, чтобы реализовать это точнее и лучше 😭 По предыстории и лору, вероятно, ещё что-нибудь напишу, хотя, честно говоря, не считаю это сильно важным. Тем более, часть лора уже вложена в дизайн, а как это трактовать... Чуть поэкспериментировала с картинкой и её общей атмосферой, так что это тоже тут будет. Рисовать дизайн в полный рост? Что?
custom 52606173215793168667custom 53100814420200874673custom 51886125169844290972custom 53530731498249992092
🌸 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Я что, решила сделать человеческий дизайн своего маскота? С кривым носом?) 🥸 (Да ладно, это поправлю.) Серьёзно, за годы ведения соц. сетей, все мои персонажи были ну очень простенькими по дизайну, а тут решила вложить смысл и свои любимые части дизайна. Снизошла 🌸 Сочетание готики, винтажа и некоторой "нежности" прекрасно может уложиться в одного персонажа. И всё же я назвала её в честь греческой богин…
custom 51886125169844290977custom 52606173215793168663custom 53530731498249992092
Здравствуйте, я Вас не знаю, но Вы мне уже нравитесь. Спасибо большое ✨
custom 53530731498249992097custom 53100814420200874674custom 53075233594985918333custom 52606173215793168661
✨✨✨🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎✨✨✨ Конечно, геймплей персонажа очень спорный, но дизайн... В общем, удержаться перед ней я не смогла – купила, нарисовала, отыграла 10 матчей... Стала я к тому же в своих работах разглядывать стиль определённый (кривые лица), что немного меня удивило. Кстати, со светом стало легче работать. Расту, умнею, гений, миллионер, плейбой, филантроп 🕺
custom 53075233594985918338custom 53530731498249992094custom 52606173215793168662
✨✨🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤✨✨ ✨🔤🔤🌹🌷🔤🔤🔤🔤✨ Чуток наспех, но тем не менее... На большом воздушном шаре мандаринового цвета мы с тобой проводим это лето, нанана 🎆
custom 518861251698442909710custom 53075233594985918334custom 53100814420200874672
✨✨✨🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩✨✨✨ Жалко я не успела выложить это в красивую дату... Так я ещё и дня дружбы не дождалась. Какой ужас, просто тихий ужас. Ну ладно. Я рада, что этим рисунком мне удалось сделать своих друзей чуть-чуть счастливее. Даже когда я говорю, что вы меня бесите или что я вас ненавижу, это всё любя. Кто-то же должен из вас людей лепить... (Извините(сь)) 🫂❤️
custom 51886125169844290978custom 53075233594985918334custom 52606173215793168662
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @suashinsposts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,000,734 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Коллекция” (@suashinsposts), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/suashinsposts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.