Video, posted without a caption
🔥30👍15❤7

Channel
@stylist_olgaK
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,553subscribers
-201 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001585728546 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stylist_olgaK |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stylist_olgaK |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 17,553 | -30 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 17,583 | -17 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 17,600 | -22 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 17,622 | -25 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 17,647 | -14 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 17,661 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 17,670 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:26 | 17,679 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:07 | 17,682 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 17,691 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 17,702 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 17,701 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 17,706 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 17,711 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 17,709 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 17,711 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 17,710 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 17,715 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 17,717 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 17,716 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 July 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,510 |
| Reactions total | 200 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
814 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 277 | 34.0% | |
| 👍 | 273 | 33.5% | |
| ❤ | 257 | 31.6% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.246% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.246% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.123% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.123% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.123% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 814 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
🔥30👍15❤7
Отдельно хочется остановиться на костюме, мне понравился его силуэт, красивый темно - синий цвет как альтернатива черному и тот факт, что его можно носить в разной стилизации: под более спортивные варианты поло, топы футболки. А если предпочитаете более классический вариант, то надеваем под костюм белую рубашку. Подробнее про выбор рубашки в этом видео👇🏻
🔥25👍8❤7
Привет, дорогие ✨ Сегодня последний день лета — пора подумать о гардеробе для более холодных дней. Что мне понравилось в Befree? 2 часть обзора • Лонгсливы - необходимость на холодный сезон. Понравился лонгслив в нежно розовом цвете. Такой оттенок смотрится свежо и будет идеально подходить под светлые низы. • Бомбер - универсальная вещь. Сейчас в моде укороченные модели, расслабленный оверсайз. Befree использует…
👍23🔥13
Заглянула недавно в Befree — и знаете, задержалась там дольше, чем планировала. Есть вещи, которые действительно заслуживают места в гардеробе. Собрала для вас небольшой обзор — что понравилось мне Идём смотреть вместе? 👇 часть 1
🔥37👍26❤9
Лучок дня сегодня в стиле бохо ✨ Рубашка Zara (это прям находка, часто спрашивают про нее) Брюки оффлайн (похожие есть на wb арт. 599114752) К такому образу идеально подойдут круглые очки
🔥47👍24❤12👏1😈1
Образ 2: горох + белая рубашка Второй вариант — классика без экспериментов. Белая рубашка, заправленная вбок, те же аксессуары и сумка, никаких лишних деталей. Здесь все лаконично и создается более строгое настроение за счет белой рубашки. Хорошо будут смотрятся мюли на каблуке, туфли или можно надеть балетки — образ сразу будет считываться как более деловой или более вечерний, в зависимости от обуви. Такой образ …
❤35👍24🔥17👏1😐1
Образ 1: горох + клетка Юбка в горох макси + рубашка в клетку — казалось бы, два разных принта, но именно на контрасте это и держится. Горох мелкий, клетка — не крупная, без резких контрастов по цвету, тогда сочетание читается стильно, а не «два принта поспорили друг с другом». Под низ рубашки надеваем топ и открываем его, расстегнув пуговицы. Это создает этакий «фокус зрения». Рукава можно подвернуть до локтя. Из…
❤34🔥23👍8
Лето — это возможность носить интересные сочетания в одежде, согласны? А когда, если не сейчас? 😂 Давайте разберём образы с юбкой в горох. Это вещь, которая в этом сезоне актуальна, но часто ее стилизуют в вечернем стиле, хотя вариантов гораздо больше.
👍6
Уже больше 2 недель я работаю с героиней нашего реалити «Стильное преображение» ✨ — и это путь оказался куда глубже, чем просто про внешность. Стрижка, цвет, стиль в одежде — это только верхний слой. А под ним — открытия, которые Елена делала впервые за 55 лет жизни: о себе и том, какая она на самом деле и какой она может быть Такие моменты не сыграешь на камеру — они происходят по-настоящему, и мы с командой виде…
❤59🔥4🤝2
Готовь сани летом, а осенний гардероб — в августе 🛷 Пока все носят летние вещи, я уже присмотрела несколько осенних образов в Lime. • Ветровки сейчас особенно в тренде (ищите подходящую модель на осень) • Цветные джинсы из гобилена • Красный акцент в образе • Тотал деним, причем не в стандартном голубом цвете, а например в белом, черном, зеленом
👍40🔥16❤13
Photo, posted without a caption
👍14❤7
Photo, posted without a caption
❤22
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stylist_olgaK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стильная женщина с Ольгой Крюковой” (@stylist_olgaK), 17,553 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stylist_olgaK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.