Channel
@styleorfasion
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
160subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001581199817 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @styleorfasion |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/styleorfasion |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 160 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 162 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 162 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
90 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 31 | 34.4% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 23.3% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 15.6% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 13.3% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 7.78% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 4.44% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 15 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Почти покинула нас с вами тут. Но иногда никак не могу промолчать. Это фото из Антверпенского магазина Дриса Ван Нотена. Совершенно роскошно, просто потрясающая работа. И дизайнера, и стилиста. Вполне традиционная для Дриса, но мы же помним, что там теперь другие люди.
❤12👍4
Не всех можно вот так вот легко узнать со спины
😁6🤔4
А что мы думаем по поводу таких вот сандаликов-туфелек, которые грозятся быть модными нынче? В Zara уже, как всегда, подсуетились
🤔3😁2😱1
Я уж не знаю, это от ВПН или что, но на компе все публикации с несколькими картинками предваряются заклинанием Album. Как Ok google, помните? Мои тоже🙈 То есть, я такая: Элбум, а ну-ка сегодня про тарелки!
😁7🔥1
Ворвусь живьем в собственный канал. Но не с одеждой, а с тарелками. Мы уже, конечно, привыкли к копированию в моде. Ну, вы знаете, когда Зара делает бюджетный Лёиуи (не побоюсь этого слова), Манго - бюджетный Гуччи, все делают бюджетную Шанель и все такое. А теперь меня отдельно потрясло, что тарелки Диор копирует Дулево! На картинках, я думаю вы легко отличите одно от другого. Видит бог, я весьма уважительно отношус…
❤9🔥2
Классное из рассылки Беллы Фрейд, посвященной разговору с Алексой Чанг: «Когда ты видишь кого-то в по-настоящему крутом образе, ты думаешь: «Кто это?» - а не «Во что он одет?». Это уже вторично. То, как одевается Алекса, заставляет хотеть узнать о ней больше. В этом и есть искусство по-настоящему хорошего стиля. Одежда должна вызывать желание узнать больше о человеке, а не о его одежде.»
👍9
Со сменой сезона я всегда подготавливаю вещи к хранению. Если для обуви и починки одежды у меня есть проверенные сервисы, то уход за трикотажем я не доверяю никому. Точнее - доверяю только советам Дарьи Шиншиной, основательницы трикотажной мастерской Fronte Parte. Большая часть вещей Дарьи связана руками из кашемира и шелка, и каждому клиенту она дарит памятку по уходу за ними. Привожу ее в канале - и отправляюсь раз…
❤🔥4
Один вопрос: куда девать котов на время сушки драгоценного изделия?
😁7
Просто ожерелье работы ZuminStudio. Рекомендую приходить в нем на каждое свидание и потом говорить ему что он всё выдумал и ты не была в ожерелье
🔥9😁9👍1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @styleorfasion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Style or fashion?” (@styleorfasion), 160 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/styleorfasion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.