Channel
@stylelaboratorium
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
82subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003061103125 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stylelaboratorium |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stylelaboratorium |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 82 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 81 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 81 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
71 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 69.0% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 16.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 7.04% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, я не пропала! Я училась! За месяц в @photoplay_ru я сделала 16 коллажей, осваивая техническую сторону цифрового коллажа с художником-коллажистом Олег Бородиным. Задание были самые разные: от коллажа к стихотворению «Ода ветру» И. Жданова и иллюстрации к статье про первые прообразы био-роботов до постера в кофейню и рекламы украшений Диор на разворота журнала. Осенью иду на продвинутый курс. Погрузившись …
❤7🔥3❤🔥1🤔1🥰1
Ресторан Bacchanalia в самом сердце Лондона с интерьерами стоимостью более 75 миллионов фунтов. Это фантастическое погружение в пространство мифов античности под парящими скульптурами современного английского художника Дэмиена Хирста. При этом многим экспонатам ресторана более 2000 лет. В оформлении интерьера использовано более 300 листов 24-каратного сусального золота. Роскошная дамская комната — самый настоящий са…
❤9❤🔥2😍2🔥1🥰1
Ренессансное #невпростоте в серьгах @baltabaev_bakhtiyor на фоне флорентийского фонтана для гостиной залы палаццо Джиролами (около 1500 г., коллекция музея Виктории и Альберта). Подобные фонтаны acquaiо использовались в Италии для мытья рук и набирания питьевой воды. Интересно, что на нижних панелях по обе стороны от чаши я обнаружила двух мальчиков. На сайте музея я нашла такое описание, что один из них стоит на д…
❤10🔥3❤🔥2
Друзья, какая шляпа победит?
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥3
Мои примерки в знаменитом универмаге Peter Jones в Челси. Люблю этот магазин за отсутствие музыки, неспешность, за некую традиционность — то, что называется old fashioned. Среди суетного дня очень терапевтично зайти туда и примерить шляпки. Замедлить время. Дамы покупают здесь шляпки для разных событий, начиная от крестин и скачек и заканчивая церемонией посвящения в рыцари. Сегодня примерила варианты в черном. Ниж…
❤8
- Но это Вествуд! — удивленно сказала дама с приятным французским акцентом, стоя перед витриной творений Даниеля Розберри для дома Скиапарелли. - Несомненно. Это orb — символ дома Вивьен Вествуд, — сказала я, показывая моё любимое кольцо со знаменитой державой Вествуд, окруженной планетарным кольцом. - Похоже, он украл идею, но считает это не воровством, а вдохновением, — продолжила я. - Но ведь это буквально одно и …
❤15🔥2
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @stylelaboratorium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Друзья, какая шляпа победит?
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 8 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 819,813 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐒𝐓𝐘𝐋𝐄𝐋𝐀𝐁𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐔𝐌” (@stylelaboratorium), 82 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stylelaboratorium.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.