Channel
@stylecheck
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,569subscribers
-34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001093436752 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stylecheck |
| Created | 30 April 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stylecheck |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 04:21 | 2,569 | -2 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 05:18 | 2,571 | -4 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 2,575 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 2,580 | -4 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 2,584 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 2,585 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 2,588 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 2,589 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 2,592 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 2,593 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 2,595 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 2,598 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 2,600 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 2,603 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:10 | 2,603 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
30 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 63.3% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 36.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 27 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Guardian составил рейтинг лучших романов ever. В первую двадцатку вошли "Анна Каренина", "Война и мир", "Джейн Эйр", "Великий Гэтсби" и неожиданно "1984" (неожиданно - потому что "роман?"), который особенно много читают в этом году (только в моем окружении или в вашем тоже?). Всего в рейтинге 100 произведений. Вот вам список литературы на лето😁 А если у вас еще со школы мурашки от этого словосочетания, то буду "…
❤2
Как же по-разному используют деньги и медийность момента Лорен Санчес и Иша Амбани... На пре-ужин по случаю сегодняшнего Met Gala Лорен надела красный ансамбль из юбки и жакета. На момент выпуска этого поста, интернет не знал имя автора наряда :( Иша пришла туда же в кастомном платье из 26 отдельных лент, каждая из которых отдает дань уважения отдельному региону Индии и его традиционным техникам вышивки и ткачества…
❤7
Зависла, разглядывая фото со свадьбы телезвезды Калани Хилликер и Нэйтана Голдмана на озере Комо. Как красиво и нежно получился ужин в первый день в пастельной гамме и как колоритно выглядел фуд-декор во второй день для велкам-вечеринки у бассейна! Полноценный продуктовый набор для итальянской пасты: от спагетти до овощей, сыра и соуса🤌 Ну, и традиционный ягодный торт, который никуда не собирается уходить из списка…
❤3
Обожаю 😅 Ксения Анатольевна, спасибо, что не упустили такой шанс 💪
😁11
Какие же красивые свадебные платья показывали на недавней Barcelona Bridal Fashion Week! Корсеты и пышные подолы, конечно, тоже были. Но вот эти варианты такие утонченные, женственные и в то же время... расслабленные что ли. Ох, повезёт же невестам 2026! Ну, что, распаковываем свадебный сезон на канале? 😍 @stylecheck
❤6
Lyst назвал самые 🔥🔥🔥 бренды сейчас. К слову, про Chanel) Вышел отчёт Lyst Index за первый квартал 2026 года. Как всегда ребята проанализировали кучу данных. Во-первых, про их оценку этого самого 🔥(aka "hottest"). Оценивают по трем метрикам: 🙆♂️Desire фиксирует культурную видимость, т.е. насколько эти бренды поддерживаются инфлюенсерами, сообществами и т.д. 🙆♂️Demand - это хладнокровные факты: поисковые запросы, …
❤1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @stylecheck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“На стиле” (@stylecheck), 2,569 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stylecheck.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.