3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 616–617 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 06:49
616
-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:24
617
no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:01
617
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 31 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
574.7%
avg views ÷ 616 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,540
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.791%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
18 (31 January 2026 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
3,540
Reactions total
28
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
614 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
491
80.0%
🔥
31
5.05%
❤🔥
26
4.23%
👍
24
3.91%
🥰
12
1.95%
👀
11
1.79%
😭
10
1.63%
💘
6
0.977%
👌
2
0.326%
👏
1
0.163%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 614reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💜 PURRFECT PAUSE SEASON IS HERE! 💜
It’s time to slow down, get comfortable, and drop into ultimate chill & relax mode with the new collection featuring Jouha the Cat 🐾✨.
We created a full line designed for total comfort: 🧥 Cat-Ear Hoodie: Padded finishes, soft pastel details, and cute ears on the hood ("Just Relax and Sleep"). 🎽 Tie-Dye Tank Top: "Cats Fur Life" style with a soft-wash print for maximum comfort. 🔑 3 A…
⚠️ LAST CHANCE: THE "WARNING" HOODIE IS LEAVING FOR GOOD ⚠️
Hey community, every cycle must come to an end. The time has come to say goodbye to one of our iconic designs: the "Warning: Furry In This Area" hoodie 🐾💛.
We have officially decided to discontinue it, but we want to send it off in style. If you missed out on yours or want to secure a backup of this legendary collector's piece, this is your moment!
📉 It is n…
📢 IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT: International Shipping & Customs Update
Hello everyone! 💛
We want to take a quick minute to share some vital information regarding your pending international orders.
As many of you know, customs regulations in several countries (especially the United States, Canada, and Latin America) have become extremely strict recently. This has caused courier services to charge unexpected, high import ta…
Hey guys! 🐾⚠️
We have a new member in the pack: Jayzac is now an official part of Stupid & Toxic. His art is next level, and the new merch is already live on the site. Go check out those 8-ink prints and holo keychains—they are going fast!
See everything here: 👉 Stupidandtoxic.com/en
Congratulations to our winners! 🎖
1st place @Dovahronir on Telegram
2nd place valdothewolfsky on Instagram
3rd place @colita_de_tigre on Telegram (Warning Yiff winner)
Thank you all so much for participating! ✨
Would you like to see more contests like this in the future?😳
Hey everyone! 🐾⚠️
The Stupid & Toxic raffle is here!
🥇 1st Place: Benny Dakimakura (or choice).
🥈 2nd Place: Moshi Hun Hoodie (or choice).
To enter:
🔹Join the channel
🔹Like this post
🔹Comment your Country
Don't forget: This contest is happening across all our socials (IG, X, FB). There are only two prizes total, so if you want to win, make sure to follow and comment on every single one of our platforms to boost y…
🔥 ¡STUPID & TOXIC SE METE AL CALLEJÓN! 🔥
Raza, ya se armó la gorda. Nos vemos en la Pawrranda para dibujar, pistear y sacar los pasos prohibidos con el sonidero. 🐾🍻
🗓 Cita: 2 de Mayo | 2 PM - 12 AM
📍 Spot: Mexikaner Beer Factory, Aguascalientes.
💰 Cover: $425 (¡Trae consumo incluido y kit de regalo!).
⚠️ ¡Pónganse trucha que los boletos vuelan!
Cómpralo ya: https://furrydrinkdrawcallejon.eventbrite.com.mx
¡Ahí no…
Skrunkly here. Is the heat keeping you from resting? Voss has the perfect solution for you ✨
A great opportunity to add this Amon Syd piece to your collection with our signature benefits:
✅ Free shipping available under current store policies. ✅ Use Code: VOSS to support your favorite artist with every purchase.
🔗 SPREAD THE WORD
Thank you for being part of Stupid & Toxic!
Hey everyone is Skrunkly! 🐾⚠️
Dropping a quick update: The new "Warning" hoodie is finally live on the site! The design by @Moshihun looks incredible in person—the yellow is super punchy and the 50% combed cotton fabric is incredibly soft. 🤩✨
Perfect for anyone who loves urban style and wants to represent the community with pride.
Check out all the details and get yours here:
👉 STORE
Thanks for always supporting …
❤29🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @stupidandtoxic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 138,766 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stupid & Toxic” (@stupidandtoxic), 616 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stupidandtoxic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.