Channel
@studyform_for_authors
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003415279824 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @studyform_for_authors |
| Created | 14 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/studyform_for_authors |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:59 | 9 | +1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 8 | +1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 03:23 | 7 | no change |
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 7 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 6 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 5 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 4 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 14 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (14 March 2026 – 14 October 2026) |
| Views total | 4 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Oct 2026, 03:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Платите за отклики, а ученики не приходят? Или приходят только по сарафану? Мы в Everytutor разбираемся, какие каналы сейчас реально работают для репетиторов. Опрос на 3 минуты, анонимный. Итогами поделимся открыто, а в конце вас ждёт подарок 🎁 👉 https://forms.gle/Msy2VeK8BMoCdt2n8
Сегодня недостаточно быть хорошим репетитором. Нужно быть узнаваемым. Личный бренд становится всё важнее: ученику недостаточно увидеть ваше образование, опыт и отзывы. Ему хочется понять, какой вы преподаватель и насколько хорошо вы разбираетесь в своём предмете. И здесь одной анкеты уже мало. Личный бренд строится не только рассказами о себе. Он строится через вашу экспертизу. Вместо поста «моя ученица сдала экза…
Не обязательно создавать отдельные Telegram-каналы для отзывов, ссылок и информации о себе. В Everytutor всё это можно собрать в одном профиле. Здесь можно: — собирать отзывы учеников; — рассказать об образовании и опыте; — оставить ссылки на свои соцсети; — делиться материалами и рассказывать о своей работе. Получается полноценная страница репетитора, которой можно поделиться с учениками вместо нескольких разных с…
Друзья, привет! По данным нашей аналитики, 90,9% репетиторов оставляют для связи Telegram. Чтобы ученики точно смогли написать вам, собрали несколько простых советов при добавлении контактов в Everytutor: • Указывайте ссылку в правильном формате. Для Telegram это t.me/username. Если написать t.me/@username, ссылка не откроется. • Проверяйте контакт после добавления. Попробуйте открыть ссылку самостоятельно или попр…
Новая функция: Интерактивные элементы в постах! Теперь вы можете добавлять интерактивные элементы к своим постам, чтобы сделать обучение ещё эффективнее. Что доступно: Викторина — задайте вопрос и варианты ответов. Подписчики выбирают правильный ответ прямо в посте. Отличный способ закрепить материал после объяснения темы. Карточки — создайте набор карточек с вопросом на одной стороне и ответом на др…
Публичная бета Studyform — в эфире Это значит одно: самое время заходить и публиковать. Пока аудитория только собирается, у вас есть шанс оказаться в числе первых авторов — занять место в ленте раньше остальных и начать набирать подписчиков с нуля вместе с платформой. Что вас ждёт: — Единая лента для всех пользователей — ваши посты видят сразу, без алгоритмов с многолетней историей — Верификация авторов — вы выдел…
Добро пожаловать в Studyform for Authors. Этот канал — для тех, кто создаёт контент на платформе или только думает об этом. Рассказываем, как работает платформа, как она продвигает ваши посты и что получают авторы. https://creators.studyform.study/ 🌟🌟
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @studyform_for_authors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Studyform x Everytutor (creators)” (@studyform_for_authors), 9 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/studyform_for_authors.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.