Channel
@study_n_roll
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
999subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001591830190 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @study_n_roll |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/study_n_roll |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 999 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 1,000 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 1,002 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 1,004 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 1,007 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 1,013 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 1,015 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 1,019 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 1,020 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:20 | 1,020 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
49 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 27 | 55.1% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 12.2% | |
| 🤓 | 6 | 12.2% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 10.2% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 6.12% | |
| custom 5215269454845331554 | 1 | 2.04% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 2.04% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ABSOLUTE CINEMA, сегодня - cinememes Два фильма в кино за две недели. Я посмотрел Одиссею Кристофера Нолана и нового Человека-паука. В такие моменты я радуюсь, что сейчас я в Сербии, потому что в Сербии все фильмы показывают в оригинале с субтитрами 🏃♀️ Мне понравились оба. 💢 Человек паук стал самостоятельным героем - наконец-то! Актеры отыграли супер, паук стал еще акробатичней, история рассказана здорово. Это мо…
🔥2💯1🆒1
It depends of on who's asking Я не зря начал с этой фразы, потому что в ней ученики, даже достаточно высокого уровня, периодически пропустят и совершат ошибку. Сегодня у меня такой вопрос: как вы разбираетесь с предлогами? Для меня ответ делиться на две части: буквальное значение, переносное значение. Первую часть я действительно пытаюсь объяснить через логику, где over the bridge, over the net, over the barrier, …
🔥4🤓2custom 52152694548453315541
У меня лучшие ученики, если вы не знали 😐
🔥6🤝3
Как выглядит разница между B1 и B2 Let's complicate things. Иногда усложнять, а не упрощать - это интересней. Сегодня давайте потратим 5 минут, чтобы усложнить и разнообразить нашу речь. Предлагаю взять несколько фраз и make them more complicated. I totally understand you => I see exactly what you mean I don't agree with you => I'm not sure I agree with that In my opinion, it's great => It seems to be great The…
🔥6✍4🤓2
Вариант прокачать аудирование для сильнейших😕 Я знаю, что этот вид упражнений сложный, но в жизни навык этот очень важен. Как нам строить разговор, если вы не услышали, о чем там говорил человек с парковки или в кафе? Как развивать этот навык смотри тут и тут. Но сегодня расскажу ещё об одном сервисе. daily dictation - этот сайт помогает прокачивать навык слушать детали. Множество ситуаций от аудирования на экзаме…
🔥3🤓2🤝2
Вы точно можете перевести хоть одно слово правильно? Конечно, я преувеличиваю, но мы не так давно обсуждали с ученицей, насколько сильно в английском решает КОНТЕКСТ. Experiment. Давайте вместе? Переведите слово break, например. Пытаюсь угадать - ломать? - Может быть. Или перерыв? А, может, прорыв? Попробуем еще: переведите слово water, тут точно никаких проблем не должно быть. Вода? I watered my plants yesterday …
🔥6✍2💯2
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @study_n_roll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Килин Максим ▫️ английский, чтобы говорить” (@study_n_roll), 999 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/study_n_roll.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.