Channel
@stroinost_irina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
171subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002411728957 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stroinost_irina |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stroinost_irina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 171 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 174 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:50 | 174 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 8 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (8 January 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
30 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 56.7% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 23.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Иногда человеку недостаточно понять, что с ним происходит. Иногда ему нужно на время выйти из среды, которая каждый день возвращает его в прежний ритм, роли и реакции. Именно поэтому меня всё больше интересует формат индивидуального ретрита. Обычная психологическая работа даёт важные инсайты и постепенно помогает менять внутренние процессы. Но бывает так, что после сильной сессии человек возвращается домой — в ту …
❤4
Дорогие друзья, сегодня я хочу поделиться тем, что происходит в нашем ретрит‑центре @suninsky_rc и почему это важно именно сейчас. Мы живём в мире, где тело и дух часто разъединены. Настоящая жизнь происходит в нашем теле, в нашей материи, но без духовного начала она не имеет смысла. Поэтому я создала пространство, где соединяются материал и духовность, где каждый может ощутить, что без духа нельзя построить материю…
❤6
Интуитивный биохакинг: Как водоросли восстанавливают организм на уровне целостной системы. Прямо сейчас в пространстве «Солнце в Небе» @sunonsky_rc проходит майский Detox Day. Основатель центра Ирина Кожевникова делится натуропатическими разборами о том, как перехитрить особенности нашего пищеварения и запустить тотальную регенерацию, даже если врачи разводят руками. Публикуем горячий пост-конспект и аннотацию к это…
🍏 «Почему после детокса не хочется сладкого?» — секреты клеточного питания Вы замечали, как сложно бывает удержаться от сахара, кофе или фастфуда, когда организм истощен? Мы виним отсутствие силы воли, но на самом деле это крик наших клеток, которые задыхаются от токсинов и требуют быстрой, суррогатной энергии. — Полное отключение «сахарной зависимости»: после чистого водорослевого детокса тяга к сладкому уходит на…
Часто мы решаемся на детокс-программу с одной целью (например, постройнеть или наладить ЖКТ), а получаем неожиданный бонус — чистую кожу или стабильное давление. У нашего тела своя логика: оно направляет ресурс туда, где «сломалось» сильнее всего. Здесь я объясняю, как это работает на примере нашей оздоровительной программы @VODOROLIFE: 🧬 140 нутриентов в идеальной пропорции. Мы не съедим столько БАДов из банок. В …
https://youtu.be/CBYpym5KCBc
❤1
🔓 Созидательный образ жизни (СОЖ): Как состояние определяет нашу молодость На основе выступления Ирины Кожевниковой на форуме «Молодость вне возраста» (13 марта 2026 года) подготовлена статья, раскрывающая концепцию созидательного образа жизни и секреты истинного долголетия 👇
❤4🔥1
СОЖ: созидательный образ жизни — новая формула молодости ☀️ Продолжаем знакомство со #спикерыфорума «МОЛОДОСТЬ вне возраста». Заключительный анонс о выступлении леди, которая соединяет три вещи: состояние человека, материальную жизнь и ощущение счастья. 🧠 ИРИНА КОЖЕВНИКОВА — исследователь состояния человека, автор концепции СОЖ — созидательного образа жизни, создатель ретритного пространства «Солнце в небе». Многие…
❤1
Channel name was changed to «Солнце Внутри | Твоё Состояние | Ирина Кожевникова»
Здоровье, как главная жизненная стратегия Нового Времени 13-14 марта | Инновационный online-форум превентивных технологий Мир переживает тектонический сдвиг в медицине. Мы больше не хотим быть пассивными наблюдателями своего старения — мы выбираем активное управление ресурсом, качеством жизни и долголетием. Добро пожаловать в пространство уникального онлайн-форума «МОЛОДОСТЬ вне возраста» 🧬 Здесь мы объединяем: — …
🔥3🥰1
🟩 DETOX DAY - Оздоровительные дни в Солнце в Небе. Восстановление ресурса организма с помощью водорослевого питания, цигун и звукотерапии. Начало года — лучшее время, чтобы дать телу разгрузку перед новыми достижениями. 🔍 Для тех, кто пока не готов нырять глубоко, но хочет пройти однодневный детокс Приезжайте попробовать целебные зелёные смузи и мягкое очищение на водорослях. Две-три полноценные порции, полезные ак…
❤1🔥1
Почему мы чувствуем себя «замерзшими» и как разбудить энергию клетки? 🧬 Друзья, только что мы завершили мощнейший эфир вместе с Ириной Кожевниковой @stroinost_irina. Разобрали не просто «детокс» в привычном понимании (попили смузи и забыли), а глубокую физику и психологиб нашего состояния. Мы сравнили наше тело с «забитым» сосудом. Если внутри токсины и ксенобиотики (скрытые враги, имитирующие наши гормоны), то зак…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @stroinost_irina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 259,037 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@stroinost_irina named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Солнце Внутри | Твоё Состояние | Ирина Кожевникова” (@stroinost_irina), 171 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stroinost_irina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.