Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

strayberrymilk

@strayberrymilk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

101subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002269956451
TypeChannel
Username@strayberrymilk
Descriptionbere bere bere bara bara bara-
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/strayberrymilk

Growth

1018 Aug 2026, 08:05 — 101 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 10:32 — 101 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:059 Aug 2026, 10:32
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 100–102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 10:32101no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:05101first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 6 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
58
Videos
1
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

584 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 543148528971128993318231.2%
custom 542926112801215471018030.8%
custom 542910366592114854416127.6%
custom 54652448579392798016110.4%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 584reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2025 to 23 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @strayberrymilk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 June 2025 to 23 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Oct 2025, 15:00 UTC≈2,420 views79 reactions5 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟 "Happiness can be 🌟 🌟🌟 found, even in the 🌟🌟 darkest of times, if 🌟🌟 one only remembers to turn on the light." 🤩 🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩 — Albus Dumbledore #autumn_collab

custom 542910366592114854439custom 542926112801215471023custom 543148528971128993317

23 Oct 2025, 13:03 UTC157 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @heniaheniasisPhoto

💌🤙😡🤩🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 😭🤣😪 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🤩 😠😒🧔 от @haejae13 😠 и @heniaheniasis 🐁 🕊вчера половина художниц уже показали нам красоту осени своими глазами и это было невероятно талантливо, так давайте же посмотрим, что нас ждет сегодня !👨‍🦲 ⏪🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤⏩ 🎞1️⃣7️⃣〰️0️⃣0️⃣ 🎞 хисын - @iiiwata06 чонвон - @meowriaaax джей - @dasha_ne_lapsha джейк - @soobieboobiev сонхун - @chizzsk сону - @lijkalee ники - @jansodiyo ➕🌟 ник

custom 54314852897112899334custom 54291036659211485443custom 54652448579392798012

22 Jul 2025, 15:00 UTC≈2,400 views100 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 The Wolf and 🤩🤩🤩 the Pearl 🤩🤩🤩🤩 Первое, на что обратил внимание Минхо, был чертов жемчуг. И Джисон — принц Джисон, наследник пяти титулов и будущего, которое он явно ненавидел, — снова смотрел на него взглядом, который говорил: "Попробуй остановить меня". Минхо не дрогнул. У него была выигрышная комбинация, открытая рубашкой вверх. Ему было нап

custom 543148528971128993345custom 546524485793927980126custom 542910366592114854422custom 54292611280121547107

6 Jul 2025, 18:16 UTC445 views57 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

держите скетчевых детей пока рисуется вкусная картинка для коллаба 🤩

custom 542926112801215471030custom 542910366592114854414custom 546524485793927980113

29 Jun 2025, 11:57 UTC386 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 542926112801215471017custom 54652448579392798013custom 54291036659211485442

28 Jun 2025, 18:57 UTC395 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

буду очень рада репостам, реакциям и комментариям😚

custom 542926112801215471014custom 54291036659211485442

28 Jun 2025, 18:57 UTC419 views93 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟 — you came? — you called. 🌟🌟 Минхо не знал, как сказать, что он скучал по нему. Не знал, как сказать “Я думал о твоем смехе каждый гребаный час, пока меня не было”, чтобы не показаться сумасшедшим. Не знал, как сказать “Я люблю тебя”. Но он знал, как стоять рядом и позволить Джисону позаботиться о его ранах.

custom 543148528971128993343custom 542926112801215471026custom 542910366592114854424

24 Jun 2025, 19:16 UTC367 views35 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

кое-что хот очень долго рисуется 🍓🌟

custom 543148528971128993316custom 542926112801215471010custom 54291036659211485449

17 Jun 2025, 12:01 UTC376 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Давно не было ничего прям вкусненького, но оно рисуется, честное слово 🙏

custom 546524485793927980111custom 54292611280121547109custom 54291036659211485446

17 Jun 2025, 12:00 UTC342 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 542926112801215471010custom 54652448579392798016custom 54314852897112899331

17 Jun 2025, 12:00 UTC667 views103 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 #ferretscatscollab Чуть-чуть отдохнула от человеческих лиц и тел, очень понравилось рисовать текстуру шерсти🐈

custom 543148528971128993350custom 542926112801215471028custom 542910366592114854425

6 Jun 2025, 14:15 UTC354 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Название: Requiem for the Faithful Автор: @strayberrymilk Пейринг: Ли Минхо/Хан Джисон Жанры: Полицейские, Грязный реализм, Ангст, Детектив, Дарк Рейтинг: 16+ Формат: Макси Добра и зла неразличимы грани… среди болот в гнилом тумане Chapter 1

custom 542910366592114854415custom 54292611280121547106custom 54314852897112899336

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @strayberrymilk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 929,077 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“strayberrymilk” (@strayberrymilk), 101 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strayberrymilk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.