Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

chaeberry 🏰

@strawbchae

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

76subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001975231427
TypeChannel
Username@strawbchae
Description23.04.23 — 24.04.24 ❤️‍🩹
Created23 April 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/strawbchae

Growth

767 August 2026 — 76 subscribers9 August 2026 — 76 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75–77 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:0176no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:0076first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 6 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,590
Videos
377
Links
101

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

62 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘1829.0%
🍓1727.4%
💋1422.6%
914.5%
🙈46.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2025 to 12 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Sept 2025, 16:17 UTC≈1,570 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я сейчас в моменте прослушивания лил фентези, и как бы не боролась, не могла не нажать на май гитар, чтобы прослушать её впервые, в студийной версии. до этого можно было лишь послушать записи с концертов, где, конечно, был шум от зала и нечёткий звук, но даже тогда это звучало так нежно, что сейчас чувства накатывают и приливаются у меня в сердце ☹️ я безумно обожаю эту песню и готова слушать её раз за разом

🍓62💘2💋1

12 Sept 2025, 15:43 UTC≈1,110 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

итак, спустя годы ожиданий, настал день выпуска первого сольного альбома чеён – lil fantasy vol. 1, в котором shoot (firecracker) послужила заглавной песней с удивительно магическим и невероятным глазу клипом 🤍 мне сейчас так не хватает слов, чтобы подобрать, насколько сильно я люблю этот проект, я люблю эту песню и всё творение, с которым с нами поделилась ченг, в которое вложила душу и дала услышать и увидеть свой

💘21🍓1💋1🙈1

9 Sept 2025, 15:01 UTC520 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🏰 второй тизер клипа на shoot

💋4🍓1💘1🙈1

8 Sept 2025, 15:01 UTC396 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🏰 первый тизер клипа на shoot

💘31💋1🙈1

8 Sept 2025, 07:28 UTC287 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

отрывок заглавной песни shoot 🦭 увы, но я читала мнения, что кому-то звучание, концепт и атмосфера данного альбома совсем не по душе, и что скорее лил фэнтези будет провальным, чем сможет набрать большие обороты. я, вместо того, чтобы сказать, что каждый имеет свой вкус и такие ващи на любителя, скажу другое: сама чеён никогда и не была той, кто хотел бы подстроится под какую-то «номру». я чувствую, что люди, у кото

🍓52💋1💘1

7 Sept 2025, 15:31 UTC343 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

«я сделала видео, в котором передала чувства, что вызывают у меня песни из lil fantasy vol. 1 при прослушивании! надеюсь, вам понравится 🏰 спасибо :-)»

2💘2🍓1💋1

7 Sept 2025, 15:28 UTC883 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

я забыла об этом упомянуть, но песня lonely doll waltz будет доступна только на cd. на моей памяти это один из малых случаев, когда артисты к-поп индустрии в физические версии альбомов добавляют специально доступную лишь для приобретённых людей музыку. так что держите в курсе, наматываете на ус о покупке данного альбика ✍🏻

💘21💋1

7 Sept 2025, 15:22 UTC483 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

мы услышим май гитар впервые в студ версии уже в эту пятницу 🥹

💘2💋1

6 Sept 2025, 17:55 UTC120 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @justtwicePhoto

« lil fantasy vol.1 » — полное превью альбома ( согласитесь, вкусно !! ) </3

💘2💋1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @strawbchae. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 480,056 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“chaeberry 🏰” (@strawbchae), 76 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strawbchae.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.