Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

так и рождаются стратегии

@strategist_diary

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,021subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001102301559
TypeChannel
Username@strategist_diary
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 March 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/strategist_diary

Growth

1,0211,0241,022.56 August 2026 — 1,024 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,024 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,023 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,021 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,021–1,024 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 10:371,021-2
6 Aug 2026, 19:501,023-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:051,024no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:381,024first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 11 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 1,021 subscribers
Avg views / post
104
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held14 (11 April 20265 August 2026)
Views total104
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4131.8%
3627.9%
👍2821.7%
🤣96.98%
😱75.43%
💩64.65%
custom 521784649964743766921.55%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @strategist_diary. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 April 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC104 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Все в огне Звучит двусмысленно. Грустно. Мы с ноября засчет маркетплейсов активно росли, но была стратегия продавать со своего магазина тоже, собирать свою аудиторию, постоянно его улучшали. Даже сделали свое мобильное приложение для клиентов. Но все меняется. Наши потери не большие, но не приятно. Основная боль для всех - это то что сломался паттерн поведения людей, товар не приходит как раньше, рекламу сокращаю

6👍1

17 Jun 2026, 14:26 UTC338 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#Итоги Начало 2026 году, продолжение часть 1. Инфобизнес идет вниз, последние годы накапливались проблемы внутри рынка. Репутация плохая, все устали покупать и не смотреть, трафик стал дороже, каналов рекламных мало, рассрочки одобряют хуже, налоги прижали, блокировки соц.сетей. Все это еще накладывается на то, что весь рынок инфобизнеса всего 100 млрд = очень маленький и падает, например только выручка золотого я

🔥73😱2

3 Jun 2026, 19:10 UTC325 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#Итоги 2025 года в середине 2026 года🤣 В этом году пропустил традицию, но сейчас появилось вдохновения и поймал новый интерес. Кто не забыл, у меня есть компания Волосы мечты - восстановление волос от выпадения у женщин, у нас комплексные решения (средства, косметика, бады, сопровождение онлайн) Результаты прошлые можно почитать тут. Закрыли рост на 67% г к г. 55 млн руб. с копейками Кажется, что не было больших

5🔥4👍2custom 52178464996474376692

29 May 2026, 15:55 UTC279 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Как результаты AI-таргетолога? Этот вопрос мне сейчас чаще всего задают. Лучше ли чем агентство? Лучше ли чем таргетолог? Какая цена лида? И это сама большая ошибка надеется, что ИИ спасет то, что не работает и так. ИИ за вас не сделает продукт, воронку, ключевые офферы, УТП, креативы - по крайне мере пока. В целом, как и любой таргетолог. Но снимет и ускорит работу уже крутых специалистов. Идеи - не делегировать

7

29 May 2026, 13:42 UTC267 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥3😱3

27 May 2026, 16:11 UTC234 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

12 лет назад я сидел с кучей таблиц, парсингом ключей по несколько часов и буквально с двумя мониторами, чтобы настроить 50% от того что сегодня сделал агент.) Вот даже нашел фото в вк. Сейчас у моря и с телефоном😅

🤣6💩1🔥1

27 May 2026, 16:04 UTC201 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Скорость тестирования гипотез в 2026 году Я очень люблю гулять, много хожу, и мне важен воздух, море, горы, поэтому мне нравится жить в Сочи. Когда надо много сидеть за компом за кучей бесполезных созвонов, где утоляют просто эмоциональный голод чаще всего, я становлюсь бесполезным, ресурс уходит. А будущее за творчеством для этого нужно много ресурса. С ИИ теперь еще и реализация моих идеи идет прям за прогулкой

👍3🔥31

25 May 2026, 10:05 UTC212 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Время коллабораций Раньше было сложно добывать трафик - все строилось на партнерствах, потому до покупателя надо было прям добираться физически, потом когда появилась платная реклама в соц сетях это ушло на второй план. Сейчас ситуация возвращается, платная реклама либо заблокирована либо стоит очень дорого. Поэтому снова умные партнерства актуальны. Не давно организовывал не большую коллаборацию Мармеладыча и онл

🔥75

23 May 2026, 10:25 UTC194 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я иногда когда что-то делаю, уже не замечаю, как я создаю какие-то решения интуитивно быстро, особенно сейчас с ИИ. Для меня это кажется очень простым, что другим оказывается очень сложным. Потом рефлексирую над прошлым, а я уже с 2017-2018 г. занимался нейронками, погружался них. Выступал в ИНГРИИ, ездил по разным городам, работал с большими компаниями, даже помню ходил в сообщество датасаинсистов в Питере, общалс

🔥3💩1🤣1

19 May 2026, 16:46 UTC274 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

19 июня еду на CPC.Forum — международный форум про перфоманс-маркетинг и рекламные системы. Давно уже не был на больших форумах, где много интересных спикеров. Тут их будет сразу 100+, с Ксенией Собчак в роли хедлайнера. Почему-то сейчас все ходят на узкопрофильные конференции по инфобизнесу, маркетплейсам, а мне кажется, самое ценное когда выходишь за рамки, слушаешь специалистов из разных сфер и собираешь собстве

🔥73👍2

15 May 2026, 16:25 UTC280 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Происходят массовые попытки компенсации говнопродуктов на ИИ Посидел не много в в соц.сетях, посмотрел контент про ИИ и все вокруг создают 100500 видео, каруселей с ИИ, пишут супер сценарии, стратегия продвижения аккаунтов за 15 минут. Вот она та самая волшебная таблетка, которая поможет получать чуть ли не бесплатно лидов. Сейчас заживем! Каждый сделал сервис трендвотчинг: парсишь видео, транскрибируешь, выбираешь

👍81

12 May 2026, 07:59 UTC307 views8 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Saas умер. В продолжение прошлого поста, чтобы все меньше людей нужно на операционные процессы. Если раньше большие компании выигрывали засчет большого ресурса на разработку, автоматизацию процессов и мелкие просто не могли их догнать. То сейчас эта эра прошла. Все кто будет продолжать по старому их просто сожрут расходы или из-за медленной.скорости изменений помрут. Последний месяц у меня был марафон погружения н

👍4💩2🤣1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @strategist_diary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 93,109 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“так и рождаются стратегии” (@strategist_diary), 1,021 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strategist_diary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.