Channel
@strategfinans
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
64subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001857281284 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @strategfinans |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/strategfinans |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 64 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 63 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 63 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 138 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Наблюдение, которое нас отучили делать Бывают дни, когда на дневном небе одновременно видны и Солнце, и Луна. Простая картина, которую видел каждый. Но пробовали ли Вы остановиться и без лишних усложнений сопоставить эту геометрию с той моделью космоса, которую нам преподносят как единственно верную? Матрица держится на парадигме: «Не верь своим глазам, верь авторитетам». Человеку с детства дают готовый шаблон, где…
Signed Радиант
Как затирают память о прошлом Официальная история — это инструмент контроля, где факты подбираются по принципу удобства. Когда античные авторы говорят то, что вписывается в признанный сценарий, их цитируют как незыблемую истину. Но стоит им упомянуть то, что разрушает привычную картину мира, их свидетельства тут же объявляют мифами. Яркий пример — Гиперборея. Нам годами внушают, что северная прародина — лишь красив…
Signed Радиант
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Радиант
Выход из Матрицы: Проявление Нарциссизма в Культах Раннего XX века 1 ноября 1965 года. В газете New York Times появилась новость, что лидер известного кулаковского и нацистского культов — Даниэль Буррос, был евреем. Этот случай проливает свет на тайны личности и происхождения лидеров таких организаций. Родители Бурроса, Джордж и Эстер Саншайн, поженились в 1936 году в Нью-Йорке. Даниэль, сын их брака, учился в сред…
Signed Радиант
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Радиант
История, которую нам рассказывают, часто скрывает свои самые острые углы. За фасадом известных событий порой стоят фигуры, чья роль остаётся в тени, но чьи действия меняют ход целых эпох. Взять, к примеру, Иуду П. Бенджамина. Человек, занимавший высокие посты в Сенате США и Конфедерации, при этом сохранивший британское подданство. Сразу после гибели Линкольна он не просто бежит в Англию, но и успешно строит там нову…
Signed Радиант
Когда-то подобные расследования не спешили называть «конспирологией», и о таких вещах ещё можно было открыто писать. Сегодня, чтобы докопаться до сути, порой приходится играть в «кошки-мышки» с нейросетями, погружаясь в самые неожиданные темы. Например, недавнее погружение в историю Ку-клукс-клана через призму AI-агентов выявило любопытные связи. Есть данные, указывающие на то, что эта организация могла быть создана…
Signed Радиант
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Радиант
Ку-клукс-клан: Марионетки в чужих руках За фасадом ненависти и расизма, история Ку-клукс-клана скрывает куда более глубокие корни. Исследования показывают, что эта организация, казавшаяся символом американского юга, на самом деле была инструментом в руках внешних сил. Британско-канадские разведывательные службы, в частности, через организацию "Бнай Брит", играли ключевую роль в её создании и управлении. Большая час…
Signed Радиант
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Радиант
Тайные нити истории: кто стоял за Гражданской войной в США? ⚔️ Многие полагают, что Гражданская война в США была лишь внутренним конфликтом. Но что, если за кулисами действовали силы, чьи корни уходили глубоко в европейскую аристократию и финансовые круги? Исследования показывают, что политическая эволюция таких организаций, как Ку-клукс-клан, была напрямую связана с влиянием британской элиты и их "придворных банки…
Signed Радиант
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Радиант
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @strategfinans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 874,709 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🏘«Наше Дело» — видеть больше. Думать самостоятельно. Понимать, куда всё движется.” (@strategfinans), 64 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strategfinans.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.