Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Straight Biology

Channel

Straight Biology

@straightbiology

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

928subscribers

+235 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002148473836
TypeChannel
Username@straightbiology
CreatedBetween 1 April 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/straightbiology

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

693928810.57 August 2026 — 693 subscribers8 August 2026 — 693 subscribers14 August 2026 — 695 subscribers21 August 2026 — 700 subscribers28 August 2026 — 703 subscribers6 September 2026 — 700 subscribers14 September 2026 — 752 subscribers27 September 2026 — 856 subscribers7 October 2026 — 863 subscribers14 October 2026 — 872 subscribers20 October 2026 — 879 subscribers27 October 2026 — 875 subscribers3 November 2026 — 928 subscribers7 August 20263 November 2026
13 measurements spanning 88 days, net +235. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 658–963 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 13:21928+53
27 Oct 2026, 22:29875-4
20 Oct 2026, 16:00879+7
14 Oct 2026, 08:46872+9
7 Oct 2026, 04:01863+7
27 Sept 2026, 08:20856+104
14 Sept 2026, 11:56752+52
6 Sept 2026, 17:55700-3
28 Aug 2026, 12:03703+3
21 Aug 2026, 16:27700+5
14 Aug 2026, 23:36695+2
8 Aug 2026, 02:20693no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:07693first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

338 reactions across 16 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9728.7%
🔥6017.8%
😁3911.5%
👍3510.4%
💩205.92%
🙏123.55%
🫡123.55%
🤣102.96%
💯72.07%
🤓72.07%
❤‍🔥51.48%
😱51.48%
🤡41.18%
💋30.888%
🖕30.888%
🌭20.592%
🐳20.592%
👏20.592%
😈20.592%
😘20.592%
7 further kinds92.66%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 338 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC441 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Думаю, большинство уже в курсе этой тряски, поскольку примерно две трети моей аудитории, это параллельно и аудитория ооцита. Но ничего, дадим сводку для оставшейся трети. В течение последнего месяца со стороны Беларуси ведётся активное наступление на некоего Алесия. Первый видос показался мне немного жидковатым, но вот второй прям хорошо зашёл. Всё-таки восстал белорусский феникс из языкового пепла, и вторая аудиодо…

❤13👍6🔥3🤡3⚡1🍓1💩1

6 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC590 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Похоже выгоднее не вести тг. Вот не пишу ничего, подписчики растут. Стоит только чёт написать, сразу отписки. Может еслиб я ни разу сюда не написал уже бы и штукарь подпистоты былб давно

😁37💯6🙏4💋3🌭2👍1

5 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC533 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

(Источники по Джону Холдейну часть 2/2) 5. Cambridge Department of Biochemistry — Haldane and the Sex Viri ( https://www.bioc.cam.ac.uk/about-us/history/establishing-the-department/haldane-and-the-sex-viri) Это короткая, но очень вкусная биографическая заметка про один из самых характерных эпизодов из жизни Холдейна. В 1925 году его попытались уволить из Кембриджа за роман с замужней женщиной. Решением занимался ун…

❤7🤓2🙏1

5 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC393 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

(Источники по Джону Холдейну часть 1/2) Доброго вечера, друзья. Отдых закончился и я начинаю возвращаться в рабочую колею. Как и обещал, продолжаю скидывать источники, на основании которых готовился последний видос и на этот раз про Джона Холдейна. Собственно, Холдейн это один из тех персонажей, которого сложно нормально раскрыть через один источник. Потому что он был не только одним из архитекторов популяционной…

🔥5🤓1🙏1

17 Jun 2026, 21:27 UTC740 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Доброй ночи, друзья. Я, если что, жив-здоров и про источники, которыми пользовался для написания цикла по истории теории эволюции, не забыл. Просто за последние две недели немного привалило работы. Но, собственно, ближе к делу. Будем двигаться по сюжетной хронологии, и поскольку первым разбираемым персонажем у нас был Рональд Фишер, то и начну я с источников по нему. Здесь уместно будет упомянуть одну немаловажную р…

❤6🙏6👍1

9 Jun 2026, 10:40 UTC803 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друг, Не знаю, если ты тут, но спасибо тебе огромное. Твой донат будет в следующем видео🫡

❤13🔥6🤪2

8 Jun 2026, 15:59 UTC793 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Как и обещал, начинаю скидывать информацию, на основе которой я готовил цикл по истории теории эволюции. На первом месте, конечно, книга Питера Боулера «Эволюция: история идеи». Именно на ней почти полностью основаны первые две части цикла, а третья, уже в меньшей степени. Если вас смущает, что два ролика написаны в основном по одному источнику, то, во-первых, да, имеет место. Но, во-вторых, эта книга- не просто нау…

❤8❤‍🔥5👍2

7 Jun 2026, 09:19 UTC≈1,360 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, наконец-то вышла третья и последняя на данный момент часть видео из цикла по истории теории эволюции!В ближайшие пару дней я буду выкладывать источники и книги, на основании которых готовился этот выпуск. Книгу Боулера тоже обязательно скину. Спасибо всем, кто ждал. ОГРОМНОЕ спасибо тем, кто задонатил на этот выпуск. И, конечно, спасибо всем, кто здесь есть! Люблю вас! P.S. Если вдруг у вас есть какие-то мед…

❤22🔥4👏2

7 Jun 2026, 01:17 UTC612 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

3 часть истории теории эволюции выйдет сегодня в 12:00. Поставил на рендер. час+54 минуты наболтали в сумме!

👍12❤2🤯2

6 Jun 2026, 21:42 UTC657 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🤣6🔥3💩2😈2😘2

6 Jun 2026, 21:42 UTC702 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🔥4🤣4🐳2💩2🫡2

6 Jun 2026, 20:54 UTC636 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

💩7🔥5🤓4❤3🖕3👍1💯1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @straightbiology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Straight Biology” (@straightbiology), 928 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/straightbiology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.