🤩🤩🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🤩 ⬆️↗️↘️⬇️↙️⬅️↘️⬇️↙️⬅️➡️↖️ 🍧: Those bound by iron chains now They still stare toward the night Wounded souls still breathing Glory be upon them ⬆️↗️↗️↗️↘️🌟⬇️↙️↙️⬅️➡️↖️ Ph #Постик 🍧рт/рк?
❤1🔥1

Channel
@stopped_time
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003546610392 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stopped_time |
| Description | Фотография: - Я останавливаю время и сохраняю эмоции, а главное — дарю воспоминания. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 30 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stopped_time |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 27 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 27 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (30 January 2026 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 256 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
150 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 60 | 40.0% | |
| 🔥 | 55 | 36.7% | |
| 😍 | 16 | 10.7% | |
| 🤩 | 12 | 8.00% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 2.00% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 1.33% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.667% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.667% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🤩🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🤩 ⬆️↗️↘️⬇️↙️⬅️↘️⬇️↙️⬅️➡️↖️ 🍧: Those bound by iron chains now They still stare toward the night Wounded souls still breathing Glory be upon them ⬆️↗️↗️↗️↘️🌟⬇️↙️↙️⬅️➡️↖️ Ph #Постик 🍧рт/рк?
❤1🔥1
💙💙💙💙 🫶🫶🫶 💙💙💙💙 𝓁𝒾𝓋ℯ 𝒾𝓃 𝒹𝒶𝓇𝓀𝓃ℯ𝓈𝓈, 𝒷𝓇𝒾𝓃ℊ 𝓂ℯ 𝒷𝓇𝒾ℊ𝒽𝓉𝓃ℯ𝓈𝓈 𝓈𝒽ℴ𝓌 𝓂ℯ 𝓅𝓇ℴℴ𝒻, 𝓎ℴ𝓊 𝒽ℯ𝒶𝓇 𝓂𝓎 𝓈ℴ𝓊𝓃𝒹 𝓁𝒾𝓋ℯ 𝒾𝓃 𝒹𝒶𝓇𝓀𝓃ℯ𝓈𝓈, 𝒷𝓇𝒾𝓃ℊ 𝓂ℯ 𝒷𝓇𝒾ℊ𝒽𝓉𝓃ℯ𝓈𝓈 𝓈𝒽ℴ𝓌 𝓂ℯ 𝓅𝓇ℴℴ𝒻 𝓉𝒽𝒶𝓉 𝓎ℴ𝓊'𝓇ℯ 𝒽ℯ𝓇ℯ 𝓃ℴ𝓌 𝓁ℴ𝓇𝒹~ Photographer-Model rt/rk?
❤6🔥4😈2😍2
⋆˚࿔ 𝐌izi 𝜗𝜚˚⋆ ⋆。‧₊°♱༺𓆩❦︎𓆪༻♱༉‧₊˚. Ꭼvᴇn..if wᴇ wᴇrᴇ grᴀnᴛᴇd frᴇᴇdᴏʍ, ᴇvᴇryᴏnᴇ wᴏuld sᴛill ʙᴇ ᴀlᴏnᴇ. Ꮇᴀn is ᴛhᴇ ᴄᴀusᴇ ᴏf his ᴏwn suffᴇring. ...Ꮃᴇ ᴄᴀnnᴏᴛ livᴇ wiᴛhᴏuᴛ lᴏvᴇ... ᴀnd wiᴛhᴏuᴛ ᴏᴩᴩrᴇssing ᴏᴛhᴇrs. ⋆。‧₊°♱༺𓆩❦︎𓆪༻♱༉‧₊˚. Ph. rk/rt? #cospl
🔥4❤1
▫️▫️ 🤩🔠 🔠 🔠 🎀 ▫️▫️▫️▫️😀😀 ▫️Kkangchongkkangchong ▫️▫️▫️jageun tokki ▫️ Eodigana supe gana ▫️Kkangchongkkangchong ▫️▫️▫️hayan bare ▫️▫️ Heulgi mudeo ▫️▫️ domangganda 🤩🤩🤩 ▫️🤩PH 🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 #post | #cosplay ▫️▫️🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍
❤2🔥1😍1
⋅───⊱𝓐𝓵𝓲𝓮𝓱 𝓢𝓽𝓪𝓰𝓮⊰───⋅ True beauty comes from within. You don't have to be perfect; you just have to be yourself. Mizi Sua #косплей #cosplay
🔥3❤2💯1
🤍🫶🫶🫶🫶🔤🫶🫶🫶🫶🤍 𝑀𝑦 𝑓𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒, 𝑛𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝐿𝑖𝑘𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛 𝑚𝑒 𝐸𝑣𝑒𝑛 𝑖𝑓 𝑚𝑦 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑙𝑑 𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑠 𝑢𝑝𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑤𝑛 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐼 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟! 🤍🤍𝑀𝑖𝑧𝑖-𝑇𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑃ℎ 𝑟𝑡/𝑟𝑘🤍🤍
❤6🔥4🤩3😍1
🤍🤍🤍𝑨𝑳𝑰𝑬𝑯 𝑺𝑻𝑨𝑮𝑬🤍🤍🤍 🫶🫶🫶🫶 🤍🤍 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒂𝒖𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒓'𝒔 𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒈𝒆🤍🤍 lyashka✨ ph rt/rk?
🔥5😍4❤2
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ ▫️▫️▫️🤍🫶🫶🫶🤍 ▫️▫️⭐⭐ 🔤y God ▫️▫️⭐⭐ 🔤y universe 🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦 ▫️▫️ #post | PH | #cosplay
❤5🔥3😍2🥴1
🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 3 월 8 일부터 여성의 승리와 함께 자연의 개화와 함께 행복한 첫 봄 축제! 나는 당신에게 감정적 인 색의 풍요 로움,삶의 사랑,친절,성실,독창성,자기 실현,새로운 재능의 발견,모든 것에 대한 사랑과 행운을 기원합니다!11 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ Ivan-tiil ph rt/rk?💭
❤8😍5🔥4🤩1
⠀ ✉️✉️ 🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶 ✉️✉️ ⠀ 마음 가는대로 look at how I rebel 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 COS | PH | #ALIENSTAGE
🔥5❤3😍1
Творчество - способ самовыражения для человека. Поделитесь или расскажите о любом своём творчестве под этим постом😚 🤩ph 🤩 Mizi🤩 🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦 #post #cosplay #collab
❤5🤩5🔥3
▫️👽🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩🌟🌟🌟👽 ▫️▫️▫️ 𝐁𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐲 𝐜𝐚𝐟𝐞 𝓑𝓮𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓮 𝓪 𝓯𝓾𝓵𝓵 𝓭𝓪𝔂 𝓸𝓯 𝔀𝓸𝓻𝓴, 𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝔂𝓸𝓷𝓮 𝓷𝓮𝓮𝓭𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓽, 𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽? 𝐌𝐢𝐳𝐢 🤩 𝐩𝐡 🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦 #post | #cosplay | #collab
❤4🔥4🤩3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @stopped_time. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 523,850 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В фокусе <3” (@stopped_time), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stopped_time.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.