Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Стописят банок

@stopisyat_banok

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

24subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003453370753
TypeChannel
Username@stopisyat_banok
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 14 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/stopisyat_banok

Growth

247 August 2026 — 24 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–25 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 11:1724no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:0324first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1727.0%
❤‍🔥1523.8%
1219.0%
👏69.52%
😁46.35%
👍23.17%
🤯23.17%
👌11.59%
😐11.59%
😭11.59%
😱11.59%
🤩11.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2025, 09:17 UTC58 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Еще стописят корейских баночек приехали таки. Виии, ну, буду пробовать, расскажу.

🔥4

9 Dec 2025, 10:04 UTC78 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

А еще я же говорила, что я и фото эстетика - это две разные вещи. Поэтому фото только такие, чоужжж.

😁3

9 Dec 2025, 10:03 UTC66 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Офигеть, мой чернопятничный заказ приехал за 12 дней! Вау. Обычно дольше, летом вообще месяц я ждала. Уууух, объявляю дни Celimax. Все серые коробочки - это они. Малюсенький Pyunkang yul - мой любимый густой тонер. Немножко Ланежа и глиняный стик от Skin1004. (Второй заказ сделала на четыре дня позже, интересно, когда он теперь приедет)

❤‍🔥4

5 Dec 2025, 12:29 UTC68 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Термотушь потестила по вашим советам, и работает же! Взяла первую попавшуюся, что можно быстро найти. Никаких черных кругов под глазами. Но немного ощущается на ресницах. Хотя может это я просто не привычная в целом. Рекоммендасьон!

🔥3👌1

4 Dec 2025, 14:04 UTC60 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Мой первый сезон с ретинолом. Пробую вот этот, где-то читала на него хорошие отзывы. Пока полет нормальный. Еще запасла Dermo Factory 300 и их же серум. А у вас какой? Жжет? Щипет? Чешется?

1

1 Dec 2025, 16:55 UTC48 viewsread 11 August 2026

Про Kerastase Gloss absolu имею сказать следующее. Это не anti frizz, это в чистом виде frizz. Ни один другой шампунь, кондиционер и несмывашка никогда не делали меня большим одуванчиком. Фу, керастаз!

28 Nov 2025, 11:04 UTC48 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Размышления на тему. Вот с одной стороны, посчитать, сколько категорий продуктов нужно (нужно тут в кавычках, конечно). Ну, вот: 1. Умывашка - две, на утро и вечер 2. Мицеллярка и / или бальзам (и это я не считаю масла, потому что не люблю их) 3. Тоники - тонеры, ну, минимум два разных. А лучше восемь 4. Серумы: увлажняющий - раз, актив какой-нибудь - два, центелла и церамиды — четыре 5. Крем дневной, ночной 6. SP

👏3

21 Nov 2025, 21:00 UTC41 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Вы не поверите, словилв аллергию. И на что, на серум с !!! Церамидами. Покажу вам, не делайте как я. Bielenda марка.

🤯2😐1😭1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stopisyat_banok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,197,704 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Стописят банок” (@stopisyat_banok), 24 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stopisyat_banok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.