Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анна Зульфигарова | тренер по энерго-эмоциональному состоянию

Channel

Анна Зульфигарова | тренер по энерго-эмоциональному состоянию

@stop_sabotage

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

55subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001875319684
TypeChannel
Username@stop_sabotage
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/stop_sabotage

Growth

545554.57 August 2026 — 54 subscribers10 August 2026 — 54 subscribers28 August 2026 — 55 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 21 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54–55 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 08:2555+1
10 Aug 2026, 09:0054no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:2254first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3833.9%
❤3430.4%
💩1513.4%
🔥108.93%
🤬65.36%
🤮43.57%
⚡21.79%
👏10.893%
💯10.893%
🤩10.893%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2025 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Apr 2026, 14:02 UTC93 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Здоровые отношения — как это вообще? После перерыва в личной жизни многие теряются: где норма, а где уже тревожный звоночек, где живой интерес, а где только чек-лист в голове и анализ до посинения. Частый вопрос: «А где феерия и бабочки в животе? Норма ли, что их нет?» Культура до сих пор продаёт идею, что «настоящая» любовь — это фейерверк, драматургия и адреналин, а спокойствие воспринимается как «что то не так».…

👍5❤2💯1

Signed Anna

21 Mar 2026, 17:47 UTC98 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Про манипуляции - фрагмент из полной записи стрима

❤2🔥2

Signed Anna

15 Mar 2026, 17:14 UTC105 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍5❤1

Signed Anna

15 Mar 2026, 17:14 UTC84 viewsread 10 August 2026

Живой отзыв в видео формате! (П.с. Оставить отзыв - инициатива человека, это приятно, но никак не призывает людей, с которыми я работаю, это делать, если нет такого порыва. Я за 100% комфорт❤️)

Signed Anna

14 Mar 2026, 10:15 UTC83 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

AI УБЬЁТ ПРОФЕССИЮ ПСИХОЛОГА? Рассказываю «вести с полей». Клиент недавно сказал: «Я тут поспрашивал насчет своего запроса у нейросетки, она мне так классно все разложила, но»… Но все равно пришел на сессию. Чтобы уже решить свой запрос физически. AI не заменит психолога, но может стать его лучшим напарником 🟡 В чем хорош AI Кайф, когда свой личный дневник можно дать почитать кому-то осознанному, с кем ты никогд…

👍5🔥2❤1

Signed Anna

10 Mar 2026, 10:03 UTC58 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Аня, Хочу поблагодарить тебя за наши сессии. Мне очень ценно, что в нашей работе присутствует настоящий индивидуальный подход. Ты всегда четко улавливаешь направление под тот конкретный запрос, с которым я прихожу. Особенно важно для меня то, что в твоем пространстве нет осуждения, нет навешивания чужих проекций и готовых «советов», как жить. Твоя коммуникация максимально экологична, а инструменты ты подбираешь гиб…

🔥3👍2👏1

Signed Anna

10 Mar 2026, 10:03 UTC58 viewsread 10 August 2026

#отзыв Отзывы - это лучшее, что может дать информацию о специалисте и процессе. Делюсь с вами одним из посланий с "той стороны".

Signed Anna

4 Mar 2026, 09:59 UTC83 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

«Любовь просто так» — Лекарство или ловушка? «Я достойна любви просто так». Красиво. Исцеляюще. Но есть подвох. «Мужчину таким, какой он есть, примет только военкомат». Касается обоих полов. Взрослая любовь - не про «принятие», а про сотворчество. В момент своего рождения и до обретения полной самостоятельности человеку необходима всепринимающая любовь и забота. Мы не можем за собой ухаживать, пока слишком малы. М…

👍8❤3

Signed Anna

1 Mar 2026, 20:55 UTC57 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍1🔥1

Signed Anna

1 Mar 2026, 20:54 UTC57 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Психолог под прицелом Манипуляции Видео со стрима почти готово. Доступен аудиоформат:

❤4

Signed Anna

17 Feb 2026, 20:00 UTC88 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Шортс с ютуба. Рассказываю про момент, когда не понимала, зачем «разговаривать» с психологом. Мне казалось, что должна быть какая-то практика, а разговор бесполезен. Поэтому и уклон у меня максимально практический, но конечно к терапевтическому смыслу беседы я стала относиться по-другому 👌🏻

❤5

Signed Anna

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stop_sabotage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анна Зульфигарова | тренер по энерго-эмоциональному состоянию” (@stop_sabotage), 55 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stop_sabotage.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.