Channel
@stop_nevros
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
811subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001637221986 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stop_nevros |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stop_nevros |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 811 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 813 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 817 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 820 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 824 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:21 | 827 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 826 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 826 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
156 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 104 | 66.7% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 10.9% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 10.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 5.13% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 3.21% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 3.21% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.641% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что вас сложнее?
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Чаплыгина Полина
Video message, posted without a caption
❤1
Signed Чаплыгина Полина
Запомните формулу зависти: Сравнение = Отсутствие контекста. Когда ловите себя на сравнении, спросите: "Какую цену заплатил этот человек за свой успех?". И второй шаг: - переведите фокус с оценки на действие. Не "он лучше", а "что я могу взять из его опыта?". Сделать сравнение инструментом, а не обесцениванием себя. Ставьте реакции❤️🫠🔥, если хоть раз себя сравнивали или завидовали?
❤14
Signed Чаплыгина Полина
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4🔥1
Signed Чаплыгина Полина
Какую тему хотите разобрать на следующем эфире?
The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Чаплыгина Полина
Запрещенные эмоции 🛑 В разных семьях есть свои запрещенные эмоции: 1. Агрессия и негативные эмоции (не будь недоволен, не злись, не кричи). В таком случае даже во взрослом возрасте человеку трудно напрямую сказать о том, что ему не нравится, сложно принять чужую агрессию (страшно поссориться и тд). Чаще либо уход сглаживание конфликтов, либо уход пассивно агрессивные стратегии. 2. Радость. (Не радуйся, потом пл…
❤10
Signed Чаплыгина Полина
Всем прекрасных выходных❤️ Ждала, чтобы вернуть я и выложить этот пост. Когда меня спрашивают - Полин, ты боялась? (Выступать, начинать принимать клиентов, преподавать, организовывать чемпионат, повышать ценник и тд), то я отвечаю - очень. Я очень боялась. Было много тревоги, но я точно знала, что я справлюсь. У меня получится быть преподавателем, психологом, организатором. Даже если будут ошибки, я все равно спр…
❤16
Signed Чаплыгина Полина
Стартовал мой отпуск❤️ По мере новых мыслей буду писать вам и делиться ими! А пока, записаться на консультации можно уже со следующей недели! Вся подобная информация о стоимости в данном посте
❤12
Signed Чаплыгина Полина
Само сочетание «наглые новички vs. скромные профи» - классическое проявление эффекта Даннинга-Крюгера: некомпетентные переоценивают себя, а эксперты склонны сомневаться в своих знаниях. Встречали? Ставьте реакции, если да 👏
👏17👍7❤5🔥4
Signed Чаплыгина Полина
Video message, posted without a caption
😢5
Signed Чаплыгина Полина
Часто ли у вас бывает «надо подумать» вместо «надо сделатьЭ
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Чаплыгина Полина
Video message, posted without a caption
Signed Чаплыгина Полина
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stop_nevros. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что вас сложнее?
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какую тему хотите разобрать на следующем эфире?
The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Часто ли у вас бывает «надо подумать» вместо «надо сделатьЭ
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Заметки психолога | Мадам Полина” (@stop_nevros), 811 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stop_nevros.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.