Channel
@stone_techno
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
886subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001893351257 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stone_techno |
| Created | Between 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stone_techno |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 886 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 888 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
791 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 487 | 61.6% | |
| 🔥 | 102 | 12.9% | |
| ❤ | 78 | 9.86% | |
| 👏 | 59 | 7.46% | |
| 😁 | 24 | 3.03% | |
| 🤔 | 15 | 1.90% | |
| 🎉 | 12 | 1.52% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.759% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 0.632% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.379% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 791 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2024 to 21 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Добрый вечер. Сегодня 21 января 2025 года можно стать свидетелем интересного астрономического явления - парада планет. Шесть планет окажутся по одну сторону от Солнца и их можно будет наблюдать на вечернем небе при ясной погоде. Самые яркие из них – Венера, Сатурн, Юпитер и Марс – видны невооруженным глазом, а вот Нептун и Уран только в телескоп.
🔥20👍19❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤29🎉12🥰6
Video, posted without a caption
🔥57👍21❤6👏1
НАСА говорит: «Неважно, насколько плоха наша фальшивка, они все равно нам поверят.»
👍40🤔10🔥6🤣5💯1
Спасибо за внимание!
👏58❤9👍5
В подтверждении своей теории удалось побывать на мысе Доброй Надежды и отметить следующие наблюдения..
👍64❤9🔥6
Эти потоки были в виде гиганской волны, видимо, в отличии от пустыни Сахары, где большой объем воды переместился. Тут волна нахлынула и отошла. Думаю только по этой причине потоки не такие явные, потому, что нашедшая волна, так же вернулась обратно в большей своей массе. Тем самым перемешав потоки и оставив большую кучу песка на берегу.
👍33❤2💯2
Можно конечно все свести к направлению ветров. И еще много чего притянуть за уши в защиту официальной теории, но повторюсь что у меня нет цели доказать свою правоту и некомпетентность оф.наук, а я делюсь своей теорией, которая такая же фантастическая, как и официальная.
👍37
Тут поток был менее выражен, но все же его так же видно
👍11🤔4🔥2❤1
Пустыня Намиб в Намибии. Официально: прибрежная пустыня в юго-западной части Африки. Формированию пустыни наиболее способствовало Бенгельское течение. Основной причиной возникновения пустыни Намиб является холодное Бенгальское течение. Это течение образуется у южных берегов Африки, около мыса Доброй надежды, а потом протекает на север близко от побережья. Под её влиянием воздух становится сухим и холодным, дождевые о…
👍25❤3
По траектории у нас опять Африка. Давайте попробуем увидить подобные следы
👍13❤2
Долго искать, думаю, не придеться. Вот этот интересный след похож, будто что-то упало и прокатилось. Если это что-то упало, то оно должно вызвать большую волну, которая бы накрыло все что находится по траектории..
👍29❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stone_techno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Каменные технологии” (@stone_techno), 886 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stone_techno.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.