Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Стоик 🏛

Channel

Стоик 🏛

@stoicus94

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,267subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002050583073
TypeChannel
Username@stoicus94
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stoicus94

Growth

7,2677,2857,2767 August 2026 — 7,284 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,284 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,285 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,276 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,267 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,264–7,288 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:587,267-9
10 Aug 2026, 06:517,276-9
7 Aug 2026, 14:277,285+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:027,284no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:557,284first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.4%
avg views ÷ 7,267 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,560
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held21 (27 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total15,581
Reactions total527
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,149 reactions across 21 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍35330.7%
24821.6%
💯16514.4%
🔥13411.7%
custom 52422032248233303861038.96%
custom 5242275539187691234564.87%
❤‍🔥332.87%
🕊282.44%
232.00%
🥰50.435%
🆒10.087%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,149reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 21 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stoicus94. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC766 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 | Что на самом деле находится под твоим контролем? 1️⃣ Эпиктет: «Одни вещи находятся в нашей власти, другие ➖ нет» 2️⃣ Марк Аврелий: «Ты властен над своим разумом, но не над внешними событиями. Осознай это и найдёшь силу» Тезис: Большинство страданий начинается в тот момент, когда мы пытаемся управлять тем, что нам не принадлежит: мнением людей, прошлым, будущим или обстоятельствами. 🌟Стоики предлагали простой

👍22custom 524220322482333038611🔥6🕊32custom 52422755391876912341

6 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC965 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 | Самая дорогая цена - это жизнь, потраченная впустую? 1️⃣ Сенека: «Не у нас мало времени, а мы его слишком много теряем» 2️⃣ Марк Аврелий: «Не живи так, будто тебе предстоит жить десять тысяч лет. Пока можешь — будь достойным человеком» 3️⃣ Эпиктет: «Помни, что ты смертен, и используй настоящее с пользой» Тезис: Потерянные деньги можно вернуть... Потерянную репутацию - восстановить, но потерянное время невозм

👍23💯1710custom 52422032248233303863

3 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC≈1,350 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 | Каждый день ты становишься кем-то, но вопрос только в том... Кем? 🌟Марк Аврелий: «Совершенство характера проявляется в том, чтобы каждый день проживать так, словно он последний, без суеты и притворства» 🌟Эпиктет: «Сначала скажи себе, кем ты хочешь быть. Затем поступай соответственно» 🌟Сенека: «Пока мы откладываем жизнь, она проходит» Тезис: Характер не формируется одним большим поступком. Он создаётся тысяча

💯28👍15🔥43🕊3custom 52422755391876912342custom 52422032248233303861

1 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC≈1,470 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 | Почему ожидания делают нас несчастными? 🌟 Эпиктет: «Не стремись к тому, чтобы события происходили так, как ты хочешь. Желай, чтобы они происходили так, как происходят» 🌟 Марк Аврелий: «Принимай всё, что приносит тебе судьба, как подходящее именно для тебя» 🌟 Сенека: «Кто слишком многого ожидает, тот сам готовит себе разочарование» Тезис: Чем сильнее мы требуем от жизни соответствовать нашим планам, тем чаще

👍297custom 52422032248233303866🔥2custom 52422755391876912342

30 Jul 2026, 17:19 UTC≈1,610 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 | Самый опасный враг живёт внутри тебя? 1️⃣ Марк Аврелий: «Никто не мешает тебе быть справедливым, благоразумным и мужественным прямо сейчас» 2️⃣ Эпиктет: «Трудно не потому, что это невозможно. Это невозможно, потому что мы не решаемся» 3️⃣ Сенека: «Кто победил самого себя, тот сильнее победителя тысячи врагов» Тезис: Наш главный противник - не обстоятельства и не другие люди, а собственная лень, страх, гордын

20👍13custom 524227553918769123411💯4custom 52422032248233303863

27 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC≈1,720 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 | Почему человек становится рабом собственных эмоций? 🔘Эпиктет: «Не события тревожат людей, а их представления о событиях» 🟣Марк Аврелий: «Самый сильный человек — тот, кто властвует над собой» 🟡Сенека: «Гнев — это кратковременное безумие» Тезис: Гнев, зависть, страх и обида начинают управлять жизнью только тогда, когда мы перестаём управлять собой. Стоицизм учит не подавлять эмоции, а не позволять им принимать

👍30💯5🕊4🥰43custom 52422755391876912341

25 Jul 2026, 19:39 UTC≈1,700 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 | Если бы сегодняшний день стал последним, изменил бы ты хоть что-нибудь? 🌟 Марк Аврелий: «Живи каждый день так, словно он последний: без суеты, без притворства и без сожалений» 🌟 Эпиктет: «Пусть смерть и изгнание, и всё, что кажется страшным, ежедневно будут перед твоими глазами» 🌟 Сенека: «Не у нас мало времени, а мы его слишком много теряем» Тезис: Этот вопрос нужен не для того, чтобы бояться смерти, а чтоб

🔥31👍1541

22 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC≈1,940 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 | Настоящая сила проявляется тогда, когда никто не смотрит? 1️⃣ Марк Аврелий: «Смотри внутрь себя. Внутри находится источник добра, который никогда не иссякнет, если постоянно к нему обращаться» 2️⃣ Эпиктет: «Не объясняй, каким должен быть хороший человек. Будь им» 3️⃣ Сенека: «Совесть стоит тысячи свидетелей» Тезис: Характер человека определяется не поступками на публике, а тем, каким он остаётся наедине с со

🔥19💯166👍5🕊2custom 52422032248233303862custom 52422755391876912342🥰1

20 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC≈2,030 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 | Почему большинство людей проживает чужую жизнь? 🌟 Марк Аврелий: «Не трать остаток жизни на мысли о других, если это не служит общему благу» 🌟 Эпиктет: «Если хочешь быть свободным, не желай того, что зависит от других» 🌟 Сенека: «Самое постыдное рабство — быть рабом чужого мнения» Тезис: Мы незаметно начинаем жить по ожиданиям родителей, общества, друзей или социальных сетей. Стоицизм напоминает: прожить чужую ж

👍34💯119custom 52422032248233303864❤‍🔥21custom 52422755391876912341

17 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC≈2,030 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 | Невозможно победить того, кто перестал бояться поражения? 🌟 Марк Аврелий: «Препятствие на пути становится частью пути. То, что мешает действию, продвигает действие» 🌟 Эпиктет: «Не события причиняют нам страдание, а наши суждения о них» 🌟 Сенека: «Трудности существуют не для того, чтобы остановить человека, а для того, чтобы испытать его» Тезис: Пока человек боится проиграть, он остаётся зависимым от обстоятель

27❤‍🔥13👍126custom 52422032248233303864custom 52422755391876912341

15 Jul 2026, 21:25 UTC≈2,090 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 | Почему дисциплина важнее мотивации? 1️⃣ Марк Аврелий: «Вставай и делай дело человека. Не ищи оправданий, если это должно быть сделано» 2️⃣ Эпиктет: «Сначала скажи себе, кем ты хочешь быть. Затем делай то, что необходимо» 3️⃣ Сенека: «Пока мы откладываем жизнь, она проходит» Тезис: Мотивация приходит и уходит, а дисциплина остаётся, когда исчезает желание. Именно привычки, а не вдохновение, определяют судьбу че

🔥3211👍11custom 524220322482333038651❤‍🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC≈2,180 views58 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 | Богатый - не тот, у кого много, а тот, кому достаточно? 🌟 Сенека: «Беден не тот, у кого мало, а тот, кто хочет больше» 🌟 Эпиктет: «Не тот богат, кто много имеет, а тот, кто доволен тем, что имеет» 🌟 Марк Аврелий: «Если ты ищешь богатство — ищи его в уменьшении желаний, а не в увеличении имущества» Тезис: Ненасытность делает бедным даже миллионера. Умение довольствоваться необходимым делает свободным даже челове

custom 524227553918769123421👍18🔥95custom 524220322482333038632

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @stoicus94. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,017,303 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Философия мысли | Саморазвитие
@philosophicaI_thoughts · 123,255
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Стоик 🏛” (@stoicus94), 7,267 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stoicus94.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.