The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
πππππ πππππ
@stockaraya
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
207subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001421354402 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stockaraya |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stockaraya |
Topic
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 20:39 | 207 | -5 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 212 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 216 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 216 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 7 May 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 2 | 66.7% | |
| β€ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2024 to 23 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Cek umur telegram kalian disini Potensi : 3-4 tahun dapet 3rb token 1-2 tahun dapet 800 token 1 tahun kebawah random (8/800) Register : https://t.me/dogshouse_bot/join?startapp=5W4reDfgR6mhvgpZjpD9Cw No task cuma perlu daftar & diemin Will be listed on Lbank, Bitget, Bybit, Gate P.s : ada ordal TON dibalik project ini
Signed πππππ
ACC LEVEL 63 RP19,M1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9MAX SET WUKONG PRIME SET PILOT BIRU MK RED & GREY LAB: M4 GLACIER LEVEL 4 UMP MARINE MAX DBS PANTHERA MAX GOLOK MAX M762 LITTLE PONY LEVEL 1 MATERIAL KECIL 9 LOGIN LINK FAKEMAIL BOT TELE MINUS TWITTER+VK NUMBER EMPTY 400K NEGO PM @ARAYAPUBGM #SOLD
π2
Signed πππππ
ACC LEVEL 69 MYTHIC FASHION 35/50 X SUIT POSEIDON LEVEL 2 X SUIT FIORE LEVEL 1 SET MUMMY WHITE SET PMGC DARK GOLD LAB: M4 LIZARD LEVEL 4 M249 LEVEL 4 UZI LEVEL 3 UMP LEVEL 3 DBS LEVEL 3 ACE32 LEVEL 3 LAIN BASIC LOGIN GP V2L NOMORKU + LINK EMAIL FAKEMAIL, MINUS TWITTER LOST, NOMOR KOSONG. OWNER DAH RESET + DEVICE LOG GAADA LOGIN TWITTER SAMA SEKALI. HARGA? PM @ARAYAPUBGM #SOLD
β€1
Signed πππππ
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @stockaraya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@stockaraya named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 β 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππππ πππππβ (@stockaraya), 207 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stockaraya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.