Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for С тобой Таня

Channel

С тобой Таня

@stoboitanya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

255subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001587448398
TypeChannel
Username@stoboitanya
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stoboitanya

Growth

255256255.57 August 2026 — 256 subscribers8 August 2026 — 256 subscribers16 August 2026 — 255 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 255–256 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 04:23255-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:17256no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:36256first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 10 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

204 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10049.0%
custom 52354510509026934824522.1%
custom 52358072067707504072813.7%
💔167.84%
custom 5235853523698067640157.35%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 204reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 6 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 May 2026, 10:19 UTC228 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍

32custom 523545105090269348215custom 52358535236980676408💔2

28 Apr 2026, 08:23 UTC275 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Можно ли обобщить и сказать: «любишь котов = у тебя травма»? Работает ли наша психика так, что есть четкие причина и следствие? 👀 Звучит громко, но реальность, как обычно, чуть сложнее. С одной стороны — да, конечно, в этом есть рациональное зерно. С точки зрения теории привязанности и схема-терапии, нам всем важно чувствовать безопасность и принятие. И если в детстве этого было мало, психика действительно ищет, гд

9custom 52354510509026934824custom 52358072067707504074

27 Apr 2026, 13:41 UTC194 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❗️Лекция переносится на сентябрь из-за отвратительной погоды и весеннего завала у студентов!

💔7custom 52358535236980676402

26 Apr 2026, 14:41 UTC190 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Сильная любовь к котам – результат детских травм?

  1. Да30%
  2. Нет70%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4

26 Apr 2026, 14:40 UTC165 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вообще недавно увидела такой пост про любовь к котам и теперь мне интересно, согласен ли кто-то с этим или нет? (мое мнение вы узнаете чуть позже)

5💔4custom 52354510509026934822

26 Apr 2026, 14:36 UTC150 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Любовь – это когда он говорит «я знаю, что тебе точно понравится» и ведет тебя сюрпризом на выставку, посвящённую котам ❤️

12custom 52354510509026934824custom 52358535236980676403

24 Apr 2026, 15:29 UTC148 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ditya_psihfuckaPhoto

исполнительная дисфункция:

8custom 52358072067707504074custom 52358535236980676402

23 Apr 2026, 05:18 UTC191 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Объявление:

custom 5235451050902693482105custom 52358072067707504075

21 Apr 2026, 06:51 UTC187 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Воскресаю после долгой паузы и приглашаю всех желающих на свою лекцию в следующий вторник ❤️

8custom 52354510509026934823

21 Apr 2026, 06:36 UTC187 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @psychosphere_msuPhoto

Коллеги, мы возвращаемся! 28 апреля поговорим о том, почему в жизни всё повторяется. Одни и те же сценарии. Одни и те же реакции. Одни и те же внутренние тупики. Знакомо состояние: «я понимаю, что происходит, но ничего не могу изменить»? Схема-терапия как раз про это – про глубинные механизмы, которые управляют нашей жизнью. Наш спикер встречи – Татьяна Мясоедова. Выпускница факультета психологии МГУ, Член ассоци

7custom 52354510509026934822custom 52358072067707504072

11 Mar 2026, 11:41 UTC362 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Апельсин в душе — странный, но рабочий антистресс-ритуал, подсмотренный в тиктоке 🍊 #техники_@stoboitanya Недавно я увидела видос с советом (на скрине) «взять холодный апельсин из холодильника и съесть его прямо в горячем душе, очищая кожуру под струями воды». Звучит странно, но у этого действительно есть психологическое объяснение. Почему эта странная штука может работать. 1. Сенсорная “перезагрузка” нервной сист

10custom 52354510509026934823custom 52358072067707504073

10 Mar 2026, 05:50 UTC268 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 523580720677075040710💔3custom 52354510509026934822

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @stoboitanya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Apr 2026, 14:41 UTCAnonymous Poll33 voters

Сильная любовь к котам – результат детских травм?

  1. Да30%
  2. Нет70%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 6 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,085,695 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“С тобой Таня” (@stoboitanya), 255 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stoboitanya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.