Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for πŒΜπ—¬Μ·π‹Φ“π„ΜΈπ’Ν’ π’π“Μ΅Μ·π”Μ·ΜΈπƒΝŠπˆπŽΜΈ

Channel

πŒΜπ—¬Μ·π‹Φ“π„ΜΈπ’Ν’ π’π“Μ΅Μ·π”Μ·ΜΈπƒΝŠπˆπŽΜΈ

@stkrs_myles

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

117subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003206607683
TypeChannel
Username@stkrs_myles
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stkrs_myles

Growth

1091171136 August 2026 β€” 109 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 109 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 117 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 108–118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:39117+8
9 Aug 2026, 07:32109no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:13109first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
88.8%
avg views Γ· 117 subscribers
Avg views / post
104
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.2%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (26 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total1,455
Reactions total109
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 7 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀2220.2%
πŸ‘1715.6%
πŸ”₯1211.0%
πŸ’‹87.34%
πŸ₯°65.50%
⚑54.59%
πŸ“43.67%
πŸ’˜43.67%
🫑43.67%
πŸ‘€32.75%
πŸ‘32.75%
πŸ‘»32.75%
😈32.75%
🍾21.83%
πŸŽ„21.83%
πŸ†21.83%
πŸ’”21.83%
πŸ¦„21.83%
β˜ƒ10.917%
❀‍πŸ”₯10.917%
3 further kinds32.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC58 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

𝐍֓𝐄̏𝐖̏ π’Μšπ“Φ“πˆΝ’π‚Ν’πŠΜπ„Μπ‘Μ· πΜΈπ€Μ·Μšπ‚Ν’πŠΜ 🀩🀩🀩 Π° Π²ΠΎΡ‚ ΠΈ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡŠΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π»ΠΈ.) Π±Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ β€” ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ. Π·Π°ΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ β€” @myles_th

πŸ₯°5❀4πŸ‘3🍾2πŸ†2πŸŽ„1πŸ’‹1πŸ’˜1

5 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC68 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

𝐍֓𝐄̏𝐖̏ π’Μšπ“Φ“πˆΝ’π‚Ν’πŠΜπ„Μπ‘Μ· πΜΈπ€Μ·Μšπ‚Ν’πŠΜ 😭😘😜πŸ₯ΉπŸ˜πŸ˜˜πŸ˜³πŸ˜ 😳πŸ₯ΉπŸ˜˜πŸ™ˆβ€οΈπŸ˜˜πŸ˜πŸ˜ πŸ˜’πŸ˜…πŸ˜πŸ˜œπŸ˜πŸ˜˜πŸ˜­πŸ˜Ž πŸ˜ŽπŸ˜’β˜ΊοΈπŸ˜­πŸ˜˜β˜ΊοΈπŸ™ˆ Π±Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ β€” ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ. Π·Π°ΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ β€” @myles_th

❀5πŸ’‹5πŸ‘4πŸ“2β˜ƒ1❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸŽ‰1πŸ‘€1

4 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC77 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

𝐍֓𝐄̏𝐖̏ π’Μšπ“Φ“πˆΝ’π‚Ν’πŠΜπ„Μπ‘Μ· πΜΈπ€Μ·Μšπ‚Ν’πŠΜ 😁😱😏 😏😘😘☺️☺️ πŸ˜πŸ˜πŸ˜±πŸ™ˆπŸ˜”πŸ˜ Π±Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ β€” ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ. Π·Π°ΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ β€” @myles_th

πŸ”₯5❀4πŸ‘»3πŸ‘€2πŸ‘2πŸ‘2πŸ’˜2πŸ¦„2

1 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC131 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

всС ΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π½ΡŒ быстро ΠΈ качСствСнно, Π° ΠΌΠ°ΠΉΠ»Π· Π²ΠΎΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅ ΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π½ΡŒ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ„ΠΎΡ€Ρ‚Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΈ классный, Π±ΡƒΠ΄Ρƒ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‰Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΡΡ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ Ρ€Π°Π· Π΅Ρ‰Π΅. вСсь Ρ…Π°Π± ΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π½ΡŒ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚ Π·Π° эти эмодзи!

πŸ‘2❀1πŸ₯°1

1 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC129 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

𝐍֓𝐄̏𝐖̏ π’Μšπ“Φ“πˆΝ’π‚Ν’πŠΜπ„Μπ‘Μ· πΜΈπ€Μ·Μšπ‚Ν’πŠΜ πŸ˜˜πŸ˜’πŸ˜ŽπŸ˜’β€οΈπŸ˜ πŸ˜ŽπŸ˜˜πŸ˜­πŸ˜’πŸ™ˆπŸ˜ πŸ˜±πŸ˜β€οΈπŸ™ˆπŸ˜ŽπŸ˜ πŸ˜±πŸ˜­πŸ˜πŸ™ˆπŸ˜πŸ˜’ πŸ˜πŸ˜±πŸ˜”β€οΈπŸ˜… 1 πŸ™ˆπŸ™ˆπŸ™ˆπŸ™ˆ2 Π±Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ β€” нСльзя. ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡ‚Π²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ @xxxh4b Π·Π°ΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ β€” @myles_th ΠΎΡ‚Π·Ρ‹Π²:

❀1πŸ‘1πŸ”₯1

1 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC112 viewsread 9 August 2026

Π΅Ρ‰Ρ‘ Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Π΅ стики Π½Π° Π΄Ρ€. πŸ˜’

1 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC120 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

𝐍֓𝐄̏𝐖̏ π’Μšπ“Φ“πˆΝ’π‚Ν’πŠΜπ„Μπ‘Μ· πΜΈπ€Μ·Μšπ‚Ν’πŠΜ πŸ˜³πŸ˜œπŸ˜­πŸ˜…πŸ˜œ πŸ˜πŸ˜πŸ˜±πŸ˜”πŸ˜œ 😱😳😍πŸ₯ΉπŸ˜’ Π±Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ β€” ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ. Π·Π°ΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ β€” @myles_th

⚑5❀5πŸ‘3πŸ”₯3πŸ“2πŸ’”2πŸŽ„1🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @stkrs_myles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŒΜπ—¬Μ·π‹Φ“π„ΜΈπ’Ν’ π’π“Μ΅Μ·π”Μ·ΜΈπƒΝŠπˆπŽΜΈβ€ (@stkrs_myles), 117 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stkrs_myles.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.