5 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 167–169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 13:36
168
-1
11 Sept 2026, 01:22
169
+1
1 Sept 2026, 15:55
168
+1
8 Aug 2026, 15:46
167
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:07
167
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 16 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
152 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
106
69.7%
🔥
26
17.1%
👍
14
9.21%
🥰
3
1.97%
🕊
2
1.32%
🙏
1
0.658%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2024 to 29 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stillwater_galiya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 October 2024 to 29 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
С возвращением, команда.
Эра ИИ дарит нам возможности, которые раньше были недоступны. Что это значит для бизнеса?
Например, теперь у event-агентства в Казани есть своё enterprise-решение — управление бизнесом, аналитика, маркетинг и создание продукта для клиента — как единая система.
И на всё это сверху — ИИ слой.
Раньше малый и средний бизнес даже не смотрел в сторону enterprise-решений. Огромная стоимость, сро…
PDP — как простой и понятный способ развития сотрудников.
Мы привычно планируем крупные проекты, личные цели иногда стратегию компании.
А что насчет профессионального развития?
✅ Какие навыки качать?
✅ Как не потеряться в море курсов, лекций и подкастов?
✅ Как сделать развитие системным, а не хаотичным?
Личное развитие каждого влияет на рост профессионализма внутри компании в целом.
Мы в последнее время использ…
Анкеты для старта работы с командой, когда охото еще немного отдохнуть...
Делюсь тем, что собрала и попробовала со своей командой (мы уже вливаемся в работу, по японскому календарю...)
№1 — Именная анкета НАЧАЛА ГОДА — узнать планы и в целом эмоциональное состояние каждого.
→ Анкета тут
*Можно нажать создать копию и забрать для своей команды как есть или исправить под себя.
№2 — Анонимная анкета удовлетворенности…
Как стартовать этот год с командой нежно?
У всей команды НГ и отдых почти две недели.
Как и у меня, впервые за...не помню сколько лет!
(может вообще в первый раз😳)
Как вернуться к работе после такой перезагрузки, вот в чем вопрос...
Работать хочется сильно — над стратегией, планами.
И так же сильно не хочется погружаться сходу в рутину.
Тогда как начать год с командой клево?
Вместо встреч и новых задач — подгото…
Завтра Black Friday в канале
Бережно готовлю для вас свои продукты.
Будет два продукта для руководителей. Один веду уже целый год, а другой — давно мечтала создать.
Всё со скидкой 50% 🖤
Знаете что? Приятно!
Завела этот канал, как порыв, как отдушину. Много очень крутых штук внедряю по управлению.
А вы сразу заметили, оценили.
Блин, теперь возьмусь серьезно! 💪🏼💔
Спасибо! У кого ещё совпало с запросом?
Мнения разделились 😅
На самом деле это — проект, который маскируется под задачу!
Как понять?
Посчитать количество шагов, которое нужно для выполнения «задачи».
Для отправки письма нужно:
— Узнать, какие есть ретриты
— Согласовать условия для инвесторов
— Передать копирайтеру
— Дизайн и верстка письма
— Отправка….
Задача ли?
Раскрыть скрывающиеся под задачами проекты — вот что важно.
А то накидываем сотрудникам…
❤5👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @stillwater_galiya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вопрос: кто пользуется AI/Chat GPT регулярно в работе над бизнесом и управлением команды?
Пользуюсь каждый день, выполняю много бизнесовых задач29%
Иногда что-то делаю, не системно26%
Спрашиваю и узнаю разное, больше личное21%
Не пользуюсь совсем24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2024 to 29 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@stillwater_galiya named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@galiya21proekt named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“~ Stillwater | by GB ~” (@stillwater_galiya), 168 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stillwater_galiya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.