Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
стикеры | темы
@stikerk877
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
113,098subscribers
-3,709 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001927673544 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stikerk877 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stikerk877 |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 113,098 | -625 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 113,723 | -176 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 113,899 | -108 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 114,007 | -114 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 114,121 | -171 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 114,292 | -239 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 114,531 | -146 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 114,677 | -108 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:43 | 114,785 | -91 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:13 | 114,876 | -92 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 114,968 | -68 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 115,036 | -82 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 115,118 | -84 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 115,202 | -69 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 115,271 | -107 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 115,378 | -87 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 115,465 | -71 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 115,536 | -110 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 115,646 | -122 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 115,768 | first reading |
Engagement
464 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 124 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.515%
- avg views ÷ 113,098 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 583
- 253 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 253
- of 464 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 464 (5 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 147,494 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 11:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 43
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 282
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 36s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Пухлый Тед - Третий лишний #тед
🥰 Жёлтые смайлы #emoji
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌴 В 7KCASINO НОВЫЙ СУПЕР ИВЕНТ ДЛЯ НОВЫХ ИГРОКОВ! Вводи промокод МОРЕ и получи: 🔰 +100 000 рублей к первому депозиту 🔰 +100 бесплатных фриспинов Получить бонус можно в пару шагов: — Зарегистрируйся на 7KCasino — Открой раздел «Бонусы» — Введи промокод «МОРЕ» и забери 100FS в слоте Book of 7K +100к рублей! 👍 Промокод максимально ограничен в активациях, успей использовать: МОРЕ ⬇️Забери свои сокровища⬇️
Кураж — трусливый пёс #мультфильм #dog #courage
Sticker, posted without a caption
СЕГОДНЯ СТАВЛЮ ЭКСПРЕССОМ НА МАТЧИ ЛИГИ НАЦИЙ УЕФА: 🇩🇪 ГЕРМАНИЯ - ГРЕЦИЯ 🇬🇷 🇳🇴 НОРВЕГИЯ - ПОРТУГАЛИЯ 🇵🇹 ПОСМОТРЕТЬ ВИДЕО ПРОГНОЗ БЕСПЛАТНО👇 https://t.me/+TEmDFyuopV4zYzRi
Eraser Head #mha #anime
Sticker, posted without a caption
Ричи #dog #vk
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 464 posts we hold for @stikerk877. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@stikerk877 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 8 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@TgEmojis · 1,677,995#1
@tgsticker · 793,228#2
@temki_zvezdys · 2,354,516#3
@temki_parnye · 979,901#4
@why4ch · 1,042,455#5
@temki_yazykii · 909,703#6
@EmojiRus · 39,459#7
@yazyki_dlya_tg · 222,978#8
@risovanie_referensy · 66,648#9
@stikery4 · 1,083,175#10
@pravdadirty · 1,395,339#11
@leoday · 5,524,566#12
@mazellovvv · 421,504#13
@test_dot · 519,044#14
@voina_belgorod_novosti · 1,119,745#15
@br1anm7ps · 1,090,016#16
@exilemusic13 · 1,445,701#17
@animewwp · 522,923#18
@wexsavi · 421,468#19
@emodzhi · 516,020#20
@official_romanceclub · 735,741#21
@kishlak_family · 265,329#22
@emoji1 · 1,083,226#23
@deepinstv · 501,819#24
@edisonfamilia · 773,693#25
@smi_rf_moskva · 2,509,689#26
@koreshzy · 826,459#27
@f3lvixx · 154,396#28
@genshin_impact_ru_off · 478,239#29
@LololoshkaUSE · 514,317#30
@oieiei · 685,689#31
@stickers_vk · 99,107#32
@zhestnovosty · 1,416,827#33
@sokhryb · 765,567#34
@windy31room · 539,834#35
@iminlovewleo · 143,250#36
@t2xtwitch · 332,810#37
@radarnews01 · 83,326#38
@maslennikovliga · 2,134,958#39
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,401#40
@DKNASASAL · 390,717#41
@GOSPOSHA_EVELIN · 101,292#42
@paradeevich · 1,059,396#43
@TERAKt77 · 29,622#44
@vanileaks · 665,642#45
@astro_juliaa · 212,063#46
@strochki_tg · 54,441#47
@milashkina_nekrasova · 249,981#48
@animeuwy · 72,246#49
@everydayrain · 237,282#50
@mskint · 3,351,872#51
@polmamki · 106,927#52
@izrailvoina1 · 527,974#53
@s4mb0ls · 38,471#54
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@TERAKt77 · 29,622
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 7 September 2026
@anime4_arts · 27,994
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
@trash_vne · 88,458
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 16 August 2026
@hypenutye · 55,838
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 23 August 2026
@radarnews01 · 83,326
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“стикеры | темы” (@stikerk877), 113,098 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stikerk877.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.