Channel
@steroshkaPishet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002440679449 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @steroshkaPishet |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/steroshkaPishet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 37 | +1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 36 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 35 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 36 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:41 | 36 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 12 | 38.7% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 22.6% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 12.9% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вероятно, это нормально, когда открываешь свою книгу, читаешь первую главу и думаешь, какой это мрак. Предполагала ли я, что так будет? Увы, нет. Но видя статистику по книге, а так же сам текст, понимаю, что оставлять это как есть нельзя. Нельзя, чтобы первые 70 тысяч символов слагали о нудности. Это убивает всё, и сейчас я это понимаю. Свежий взгляд всегда необходим, и я рада, что смогла наконец увидеть это. Так чт…
❤2
Шутка по книге: Люций и Мигель кор
Примерно в таком состоянии я выясняла, что события первой книги длятся три месяца (я ещё и проверяла, чтобы упоминания временных промежуток были точными)
👏3
Меня посадят, если я реально напишу эту книгу Но кто не рискует, тот не пьет шампанское!
👏2
Voice message, posted without a caption
Мне приснился сон >:D Причём подобный мне уже один раз снился. Думаю, запишу ГС о нём
🔥2
Видео не моё, но ситуация — да
👏2
Я подумала, что можно было бы показать мою первую модельку Десада, но, как на зло, она удалилась из Гача2. Осталось только видео у меня в галерее. Скажу сразу: вместе с тем, что поменялась моделька, поменялись и некоторые другие составляющие характера персонажа. В видео вы не встретите спойлеров сюжета, разве что намёки на взаимоотношения и персонажей. Оно вообще сделано по сюжету ролевого проекта, а не тому, что бу…
🔥2
Тебе пришло новое сообщение: Тогда тоже ради смеха видео (можете и дизайн Десада оценить, если хотите) Ответ: Забавно, но из этого списка очень много про него — да Дизайн 10/10. Шикарно
Вот видео про которое я говорила. Ну и, если кому интересно, вот само сочинение моё
🥰1
Channel photo updated
ПРИВЕЕЕЕТ! Я к вам с видео смеха ради и ... Не знаю. Ни с чем больше 😅 У меня конечно было видео, которое я сняла позавчера, но не уверена, что буду его публиковать в тик ток. Там вся информация устарела, да и просто так себе выглядит. Разве что сюда... Посмотрим. Не знаю. Знаю только то, что надо мне как-то действовать! А как — уже потом придумаю 😃 В видео шуточное взаимодействие между Десадом и Целестианой
😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @steroshkaPishet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“А.Тома-Лебель | Книги и мир Зейген” (@steroshkaPishet), 37 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/steroshkaPishet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.