Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝗁𝖾𝗅𝗉 𝖿𝗋. 𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗑𝗇ᥫ᭡.

@sterolinxn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

883subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002263726006
TypeChannel
Username@sterolinxn
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sterolinxn

Growth

8818838827 Aug 2026, 13:52 — 881 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:06 — 881 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:43 — 883 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:528 Aug 2026, 13:43
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 881–883 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 13:43883+2
8 Aug 2026, 01:06881no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:52881first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.4%
avg views ÷ 883 subscribers
Avg views / post
383
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,831
Reactions total493
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

493 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 529002914595317692119138.7%
custom 528981028300970655014529.4%
custom 52897593833522816488717.6%
custom 52896621495876671917014.2%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 493reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC15 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @velrekstickersPhoto

🥡🥡🥡💬💬💬💬🦋🦋🥡🥡🥡 подписи подарков на день рождение 1. 🔠ƅ℩ ɕɛɾσϫϰᴙ 🔇ɞʓ℘σɕλɛɛ ɕᎿɑλɑ Ϟ γ ʮёҕγ 🍼 π℘σɾγλᴙλɑ,Ꮏƅ℩ ɞʓ℘σɕλɛɛ ɕᎿɑλɑ🍼🍼 2. 🤩ɑᎴℽ .ⅈᎿ'ʂ ℽσʋɼ ᏰⅈɼᎿℏⅆɑℽ_ 3. 🪽🪽᥌ მꤊᤉო թჿ𐌟მᤉꤊսꤎ! ნყმᤉա᥇ թ᥏იձრ᥇᥌ꤎ - მձო იჿმ 🤩᥏᥊ձ᥈ჿ 4. 🔹ƅ℩ πσɾɑɕϞλɑ ɕɞɛ ʮϞ,ʓɑɾɑϫɑλɑ җɛλɑϰϞɛ . . ʮᎿσҕ ɞ əᎿσᎿ ɞɛ ʮɛ℘ σϰ π℘Ϟɯёλ ϰɑ ɕɞϞϫɑϰϞɛ

7 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC27 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rhyzexxPhoto

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 stickers w cleo sertori. 🤩 #CLEOSERTORI если берете, «+» в комм. with love, rhyzex.💍

7 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC86 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

``NEW THEME|| asimix ⌞ отдать голос⌝ #newtheme #telegram #android #ios ୨୧ ───────── ୨୧

6 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC343 views77 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟↝Оливия Кук :: Селебрити↜ ↑︎↓︎колор 41``65``1:1 ↓︎↑︎проголосовать за канал 🌟 #ОливияКук #стикеры

custom 529002914595317692136custom 528981028300970655024custom 528975938335228164817

4 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC388 views73 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟↝Дерен Кутлу :: Любимое прошлое↜ ↑︎↓︎колор 41``120``1:1 ↓︎↑︎проголосовать за канал 🌟 #ДеренКутлу #стикеры

custom 529002914595317692131custom 528975938335228164821custom 528981028300970655021

2 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC329 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟↝Нина Добрев :: Селебрити↜ ↑︎↓︎колор чб``90``1:1 ↓︎↑︎проголосовать за канал 🌟 #НинаДобрев #аватарки

custom 528975938335228164834custom 528981028300970655017custom 529002914595317692113

2 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC342 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟↝Билли Айлиш (походки) :: Селебрити↜ ↑︎↓︎колор ×``40``16:9 ↓︎↑︎проголосовать за канал 🌟 #БиллиАйлиш #нарезки

custom 529002914595317692136custom 528975938335228164815custom 528981028300970655010

1 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC468 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟↝Хоуп Майклсон:: Наследие↜ ↑︎↓︎колор ``43``1:1 ↓︎↑︎проголосовать за канал 🌟 #ХоупМайклсон #стикеры

custom 528981028300970655032custom 528966214958766719116custom 529002914595317692111

31 Jul 2026, 18:56 UTC≈1,430 views75 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟↝Дин Винчестер s1 ep1-3 :: Сверхъестественное↜ ↑︎↓︎колор ×``625``1:1 ↓︎↑︎проголосовать за канал 🌟 #ДинВинчестер #нарезки

custom 529002914595317692137custom 528966214958766719119custom 528981028300970655019

31 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC403 views84 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟↝Синди Кимберли :: Селебрити↜ ↑︎↓︎колор чб``75``1:1 ↓︎↑︎проголосовать за канал 🌟 #СиндиКимберли #аватарки

custom 528966214958766719135custom 529002914595317692127custom 528981028300970655022

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @sterolinxn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 239,674 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗁𝖾𝗅𝗉 𝖿𝗋. 𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗑𝗇ᥫ᭡.” (@sterolinxn), 883 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sterolinxn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.