Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Стерлигов. Приватка. Запостить

Channel

Стерлигов. Приватка. Запостить

@sterligov_zapostitw

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

209subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003892152252
TypeChannel
Username@sterligov_zapostitw
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 23 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sterligov_zapostitw

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

208217212.57 August 2026 — 217 subscribers8 August 2026 — 217 subscribers16 August 2026 — 216 subscribers24 August 2026 — 214 subscribers31 August 2026 — 211 subscribers9 September 2026 — 208 subscribers17 September 2026 — 209 subscribers2097 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 207–218 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 22:17209+1
9 Sept 2026, 20:55208-3
31 Aug 2026, 13:16211-3
24 Aug 2026, 17:25214-2
16 Aug 2026, 04:06216-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:46217no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:15217first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤627.3%
🤣627.3%
🤡418.2%
👍29.09%
🤩29.09%
😁14.55%
😭14.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Apr 2026, 13:09 UTC≈1,630 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❗️ Еженедельный стрим закрытаго канала «ГЕРМАН» пройдет в суботу в 9:30 (мск). ▪️ Присылайте свои вопросы: @dmstrn

🤡2🤩1

27 Mar 2026, 06:13 UTC≈1,720 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❗️ Еженедельный стрим закрытаго канала «ГЕРМАН» пройдет завтра в 9:30 (мск). ▪️ Присылайте свои вопросы: @dmstrn

❤1🤡1🤩1

23 Mar 2026, 22:54 UTC≈1,360 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤4😁1

23 Mar 2026, 22:54 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 8 August 2026

❗️ Еженедельный стрим закрытаго канала «ГЕРМАН» пройдет завтра в 9:30 (мск). ▪️ Присылайте свои вопросы: @dmstrn

23 Mar 2026, 22:54 UTC≈1,490 viewsread 8 August 2026

🔹 Напоминаем: через полтора часа, в 9:30, в этом канале пройдет еженедельный стрим с Германом Стерлиговым. ▪️ Присылайте свои вопросы: @dmstrn

23 Mar 2026, 22:54 UTC584 viewsread 8 August 2026

❗️ Напоминаем: через полтора часа в этом канале пройдет еженедельный стрим с Германом Стерлиговым.

23 Mar 2026, 22:54 UTC704 viewsread 8 August 2026

Это ложь что я отказываюсь от открытого обсуждения вопросов веры со представителями лжесвященства. Неизменно соглашаюсь обсудить вопросы веры и истории. Но не устно, а письменно. Более того, позиция христиан по вопросу впадения рпц в ересь уже почти 20 лет в письменном виде находится в открытом доступе на нашем сайте и все эти годы раздается в печатном виде в виде брошюр тысячам посетителей Слободы братьев Стерлиговы…

23 Mar 2026, 22:54 UTC759 viewsread 8 August 2026

Под новым интервью с Амираном появилось много ботов, которые необоснованно и глупо поливают Германа грязью. Прошу вас помочь в комментариях разоблачать лживые нападки, а то я тут один сражаюсь. Вы уже все знаете и все понимаете. Давайте помогайте. Админ Дмитрий

23 Mar 2026, 22:54 UTC960 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня только хорошие новости.

🤡1

23 Mar 2026, 22:54 UTC≈1,100 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В ответ на многочисленные вопросы, что я буду делать, если ко мне придут убивать моих коров - в смысле как я их буду защищать. Отвечаю: в данной ситуации никак. Если государству это будет нужно, то пусть придут и убьют моих коров.

🤣6😭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sterligov_zapostitw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Стерлигов. Приватка. Запостить” (@sterligov_zapostitw), 209 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sterligov_zapostitw.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.