Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Steph Lowe

Channel

Steph Lowe

@steph_lowe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

182subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001115648492
TypeChannel
Username@steph_lowe
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 30 June 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/steph_lowe

Growth

1821881857 August 2026 — 188 subscribers8 August 2026 — 188 subscribers16 August 2026 — 184 subscribers22 August 2026 — 182 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 181–189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 20:24182-2
16 Aug 2026, 08:45184-4
8 Aug 2026, 12:04188no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:40188first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 October 2020the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 September 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2021, 20:32 UTC≈2,270 viewsread 8 August 2026

Hey gang. I’m committing to making a mandate specific discussion for as long as it is relevant. It’s private and you can remain anonymous here: https://t.me/joinchat/pyZ-e46JxAxmZTY1 “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.” - Margaret Mead.

12 Jan 2021, 21:54 UTC≈2,960 viewsread 8 August 2026

Allow me to introduce myself to everyone new here, and clarify recent discussions. My name is Steph Northeast (née Lowe). I am a practicing Nutritionist. First and foremost, I am a mother. I believe in the power of real food, metabolic health and the immune system. I support individual choice. I support medical freedom. I do not believe that the pharmaceutical industry has health as the first interest. I do not s

10 Oct 2020, 07:00 UTC≈1,920 viewsread 8 August 2026

Just another conspiracy theory right? #sarcasm https://www.spectator.com.au/2020/10/dangerous-elites-planning-the-great-reset/

10 Oct 2020, 01:20 UTC≈1,500 viewsread 8 August 2026

ICYMI: Counting COVID-19 ‘Cases’ is Misleading Everybody. “The implications of this for the false positive rate of PCR tests are obvious and significant.” Except to Dan Andrews et al. https://lockdownsceptics.org/counting-covid-19-cases-is-misleading-everybody/

9 Oct 2020, 09:47 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 8 August 2026

As they always are... Do the math on 1 in 10,000 experiencing an adverse event for Australia alone... https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/morrison-government-grants-indemnity-for-covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-20201008-p5636o.html

8 Oct 2020, 21:41 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 8 August 2026

ICYMI: “Cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 peptides revealed pre-existing T cell responses in 81% of unexposed individuals and validated similarity with common cold coronaviruses, providing a functional basis for heterologous immunity in SARS-CoV-2 infection.” https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-020-00808-x

8 Oct 2020, 09:57 UTC811 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

78 peer reviewed trials; 100% of early treatment studies are effective. What not evidence do you need? https://c19study.com

8 Oct 2020, 09:52 UTC657 viewsread 8 August 2026

Another lockdown consequence: https://www.smh.com.au/national/cancer-screening-rates-plummet-during-pandemic-20201007-p562u5.html

7 Oct 2020, 07:25 UTC601 viewsread 8 August 2026

Surprise surprise, lockdowns have had little effect on COVID-19 spread: https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/10/stats-hold-a-surprise-lockdowns-may-have-had-little-effect-on-covid-19-spread

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @steph_lowe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Steph Lowe” (@steph_lowe), 182 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/steph_lowe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.