⠀⠀ ⩩ › WIN ﹠ @BESTIRL ⇉ 𝄒𓏏 главной ирл рико морияма становится . . . ⠀⠀↳ ⁝ @rikoskisser набирая 6969 голосов ! ‹

Channel
♤
@stellerelate
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
41subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003759903535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stellerelate |
| Created | 1 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stellerelate |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 41 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 38 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 1 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 704.1%
- avg views ÷ 41 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 289
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 39.0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (1 March 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,887 |
| Reactions total | 622 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 28s
- Average length
- 28s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
622 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5404548573385729976 | 130 | 20.9% | |
| custom 5316908451450873563 | 112 | 18.0% | |
| custom 5327918982366264965 | 99 | 15.9% | |
| custom 5321528887073601296 | 94 | 15.1% | |
| custom 5287457787687769835 | 79 | 12.7% | |
| custom 5316531147163852748 | 58 | 9.32% | |
| custom 5325605880484366414 | 50 | 8.04% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 622reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
я в DNI!!! не пишите мне, если я вас не попросила, связь онли через бота @v1vv1xbot
custom 540454857338572997627custom 528745778768776983524custom 531690845145087356323custom 532560588048436641411custom 53215288870736012969custom 53279189823662649659
Sticker, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
custom 540454857338572997625custom 531690845145087356322custom 532791898236626496522custom 532560588048436641421custom 531653114716385274820custom 532152888707360129620
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤩🤩🤩 ✉️✉️ 🤍our opinion✉️ about me 🍼 ✉️
custom 540454857338572997629custom 532152888707360129624custom 531690845145087356323custom 528745778768776983520custom 531653114716385274819custom 532791898236626496518
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤍ove... миставшкаф🤩никс🤩вера🤩таня🤩флуд ври/политика🤩ofc Рико порядок значения не имеет
custom 531690845145087356326custom 532791898236626496526custom 540454857338572997622custom 532152888707360129620custom 532560588048436641418custom 528745778768776983517
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤍ivienne 🤩🤩🤩 or viv she🤩her 🤩🤩🤩 🎀 dm🤩sfp🤩bot🤩wins🤩dni 13.08🤩
custom 540454857338572997627custom 532791898236626496524custom 532152888707360129621custom 531653114716385274819custom 528745778768776983518custom 531690845145087356318
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @stellerelate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 337,334 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“♤” (@stellerelate), 41 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stellerelate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.