2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 223–225 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 10:30
224
no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:03
224
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
281
Videos
63
Links
224
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 22s
Average length
2m 22s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
592 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5373127069389578324
108
18.2%
❤🔥
97
16.4%
custom 5451618172249598437
69
11.7%
custom 5431719507162851497
68
11.5%
😍
62
10.5%
custom 5294089088343744619
55
9.29%
🔥
47
7.94%
custom 5287648432696086492
26
4.39%
🤩
16
2.70%
😈
10
1.69%
🌚
9
1.52%
😎
9
1.52%
💔
8
1.35%
👀
5
0.845%
💘
2
0.338%
🍌
1
0.169%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 592reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2025 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @steinkathrin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 November 2025 to 16 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
— Если честно, — произнесла она, — я бы выпила что-то покрепче. Все равно сегодня пятница.
— Увы, не смогу составить компанию. На машине, да и дежурство завтра.
Ответ получился похож на отговорку. Одри нахмурилась на мгновение, наверняка жалея о сказанном, но, взглянув на Дмитрия, сразу же расслабилась. Что такого она нашла в его глазах, что успокоилась? Поняла по мимике, что он не врет? Или просто за неделю уже из…
🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁
Не думала, что когда-то напишу этот пост, но факт остается фактом: "Смерть в твоих глазах" официально пригласили в издательство ЭКСМО.
До сих пор трудно это осознать, если честно. Не думала, что со мной может такое произойти.
Оказывается, может)
Впереди еще много работы перед тем, как книга появится на книжных полках, но фундамент положен и остается лишь уверенно двигаться к заданной цели.
Спасибо каждому,…
Я жива!
Могла бы сейчас рассказать о куче причин, почему меня так долго не было, ничего не выходило и не писалось, но решила, что оправдания не нужны, поэтому просто коротко сообщу:
Сегодня выйдет глава!
(Галя, прости, придется проверить)
И еще арт к главе!
Новая глава написана, поэтому время традиционной правда/ложь
Лэйн поймёт, что информацию Сектуму сливают из ее отдела56%
Найдут новый труп6%
Дмитрий будет успокаивать Лэйн после ночного кошмара38%
Дмитрий скажет, что нельзя доверять Лестеру12%
Борис заметит "особое" отношение Лэйн к Дмитрию50%
The shares total 162%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
С днем обновы и с днем рождения меня:)
Галя сказала отправить зарос во вселенную на обнову, и она вышла 💅
Если есть желание, можете подарить мне настойку😁 или бутылку воды завтра: 2200700805789343 (Тинькофф, при нажатии номер копируется)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @steinkathrin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Новая глава написана, поэтому время традиционной правда/ложь
Лэйн поймёт, что информацию Сектуму сливают из ее отдела56%
Найдут новый труп6%
Дмитрий будет успокаивать Лэйн после ночного кошмара38%
Дмитрий скажет, что нельзя доверять Лестеру12%
Борис заметит "особое" отношение Лэйн к Дмитрию50%
The shares total 162%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Пока я дописываю главу, предлагаю предположить, что в ней будет)
Дмитрия ранят😅17%
Лэйн расскажет правду про Дмитрия Борису😳12%
Лэйн расскажет правду про Дмитрия Лестеру😀15%
Лэйн застанет Дмитрия спящим у себя дома🥹44%
Лэйн и Дмитрий обнимутся😭32%
Лэйн и Дмитрий переспят 💅49%
The shares total 169%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
У многих авторов видела плейлисты для их работ. Будет ли такое интересно для "Тот, кто не говорит"? Музыка, которая ассоциируется с работой?
Да, конечно!89%
Нууу, не очень11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2025 to 16 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 371,718 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@steinkathrin named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dmitrydeagle named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kathrin Stein” (@steinkathrin), 224 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/steinkathrin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
