Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Stefan che Crypto | Стефан че Крипто | SteFANlifeTV | Stephan the crypt | stefan_studio

@stefanthecrypto

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

995subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002141891412
TypeChannel
Username@stefanthecrypto
DescriptionЧто такое качественный контент?)) Это тот контент который мы считаем качественным!) Поэтому можете посмотреть мой, и решить - качественный ли он для вас 🤪🤪🤪
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/stefanthecrypto

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@stefanthecrypto/350 · this entry19 Mar 2026, 13:42 UTC@defigen_capital/100919 Mar 2026, 15:34 UTC1.001.9 hours
@stefanthecrypto/351 · this entry21 Mar 2026, 17:10 UTC@defigen_capital/101021 Mar 2026, 19:01 UTC1.001.8 hours
@stefanthecrypto/352 · this entry4 Apr 2026, 08:50 UTC@defigen_capital/10114 Apr 2026, 10:40 UTC1.001.8 hours
@stefanthecrypto/353 · this entry9 Apr 2026, 12:15 UTC@defigen_capital/10129 Apr 2026, 14:08 UTC1.001.9 hours
@stefanthecrypto/355 · this entry21 Apr 2026, 13:31 UTC@defigen_capital/101321 Apr 2026, 15:27 UTC1.001.9 hours
@stefanthecrypto/356 · this entry24 Apr 2026, 13:09 UTC@defigen_capital/101424 Apr 2026, 15:01 UTC1.001.9 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@defigen_capital8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.9 hoursthis entry (80)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 19 March 2026 to 8 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @stefanthecrypto — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9957 Aug 2026, 12:08 — 995 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 00:34 — 995 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:088 Aug 2026, 00:34
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 994–996 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 00:34995no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:08995first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 995 subscribers
Avg views / post
167
1 post measured
Reaction rate
54.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 March 202624 July 2026)
Views total167
Reactions total91
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
124
Videos
11
Links
44

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,000 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤩23911.9%
👍20510.3%
1999.95%
🆒1929.60%
🌭1678.35%
🐳1427.10%
🍓1396.95%
🥰1346.70%
🗿1266.30%
🍾1145.70%
🔥1035.15%
👏884.40%
🎉773.85%
💯753.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,000reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC167 views91 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🐳47🍓1211🎉8🗿7🆒6

13 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC175 views91 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤩45🌭11💯11🥰9🍓8🐳7

11 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC176 views98 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хочу спать

🗿51🥰14👏11🌭97🍓6

11 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC176 views101 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍48🗿14🔥1310🐳8👏8

8 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC176 views103 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если вы давно следите за мной, то знаете — я всегда за практику, а не за красивые обещания. Именно поэтому я решил собрать закрытое комьюнити, в котором есть всё, что помогает реально расти в крипте: обучение, инструменты, сильное окружение и постоянная поддержка. Внутри вы получаете: 💬 Закрытое комьюнити • приватный Telegram-чат • общение с единомышленниками • помощь участников • ответы на вопросы • обсуждение ры

🆒56🌭13🍾11👍10🐳7🔥6

28 Jun 2026, 18:09 UTC171 views99 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍾53🥰13🔥10🤩10💯8🌭5

12 Jun 2026, 07:56 UTC176 views89 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎮 Нашёл любопытный крипто-проект для тех, кто любит не только холдить, но и играть. Kingdom Rush на блокчейне — строишь башни, отбиваешь волны монстров, прокачиваешь героев и получаешь игровые награды. 🏹 Сейчас самое интересное — до 30 июня можно бесплатно заминтить NFT-героя. 🎁 Не факт, что этот минт потом будет доступен или останется бесплатным, поэтому лучше забрать сейчас и уже потом решать, играть или нет.

41💯14🍓10🌭8👍8🤩8

30 May 2026, 09:58 UTC181 views101 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🪂 В последнее время начал чаще чекать старые кошельки через один сервис Drop Hunter — и оказалось, что на многих адресах лежат непроклейменные аирдропы 👀 Причем не только какие-то ноунейм токены, а вполне нормальные раздачи из EVM экосистемы. Особенно если раньше активно юзали: — Arbitrum — Base — Optimism — zkSync — Linea — Scroll и другие сети Drop Hunter сам сканит адреса, ищет доступные клеймы и показывает,

🤩57🆒148🎉8👍8💯6

15 May 2026, 12:18 UTC186 views113 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🪂 В последнее время начал чаще чекать старые кошельки через один сервис Drop Hunter — и оказалось, что на многих адресах лежат непроклейменные аирдропы 👀 Причем не только какие-то ноунейм токены, а вполне нормальные раздачи из EVM экосистемы. Особенно если раньше активно юзали: — Arbitrum — Base — Optimism — zkSync — Linea — Scroll и другие сети Drop Hunter сам сканит адреса, ищет доступные клеймы и показывает,

👍57👏15🔥13🤩11🆒10🐳7

6 May 2026, 12:18 UTC183 views101 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥶 Если вас когда-то "отрезало" от Aave, Uniswap или других DeFi - не спешите списывать средства. Фронтенд могут заблочить, но активы в контракте остаются. Нашёл сервис, который вытаскивает ликвидность, стейкинги, забытые позиции и даже проверяет контракты на невостребованные аирдропы🎁. Работает в большинстве сетей и протоколов, включая свапалки типа SushiSwap и PancakeSwap. Особенно актуально для старых пулов, котор

🤩5910👏9🗿9🍓7🍾7

3 May 2026, 08:14 UTC186 views102 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥰5212🤩11🍓10🎉10🍾7

2 May 2026, 10:22 UTC185 views96 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ Просто чекнул свой Solana-кошелёк через https://solhunt.info/ и честно, немного офигел Я думал там уже давно пусто и всё “прошло мимо”, но нет 👇 🔍 Сервис поднимает ВСЕ аирдропы — включая мем-койны, тестнеты и вообще забытые активности (типа свапы на дексах и тд) 🔥 И сразу отделяет нормальные активы от мусора, который годами висел мёртвым грузом 💸 Самый прикол в том, что весь этот шлак можно автоматически сконвер

🐳50🗿16👏8🤩8🥰86

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stefanthecrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stefan che Crypto | Стефан че Крипто | SteFANlifeTV | Stephan the crypt | stefan_studio” (@stefanthecrypto), 995 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stefanthecrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.