2 сентября прошлого года я на шару отправила переведённый на английский рассказ «Путь сантеро» на иностранный #конкурс The Iowa Review — и вот пришёл ответ :D
custom 547202580814079969217

Channel
@steeldices
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
707subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001358153749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @steeldices |
| Description | Фэнтези-канал Дарьи Сталь @DaryaSteel , населённый драконами и вдохновлённый ролёвками. Мои книги: litres.ru/author/darya-stal |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/steeldices |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 707 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 707 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 706 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (13 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,264 |
| Reactions total | 318 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
352 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5472025808140799692 | 136 | 38.6% | |
| custom 5474409764098181329 | 133 | 37.8% | |
| custom 5381844594575023952 | 24 | 6.82% | |
| custom 5253637230924177957 | 22 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5253860856986378602 | 21 | 5.97% | |
| custom 5253858400265084301 | 10 | 2.84% | |
| custom 5253935284474647424 | 6 | 1.70% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 352reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @steeldices. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
2 сентября прошлого года я на шару отправила переведённый на английский рассказ «Путь сантеро» на иностранный #конкурс The Iowa Review — и вот пришёл ответ :D
custom 547202580814079969217
4-7 числа скидка 🔢 % на «Рубиновый орден» на Автор Тудей 👀
custom 547202580814079969212custom 54744097640981813294
Сериал «One Piece. Большой куш» Сразу оговорюсь, я не смотрела аниме и даже была не в курсе сюжета, а кучу сезонов старых аниме я не люблю, и обычно в просмотр такого не влезаю. Но сериал дал возможность ознакомиться с культовой вселенной — и мне понравилось. Точнее, первые пару серий я была в сомнениях и не понимала, нравится ли мне безумие и непонятность происходящего на экране. А потом втянулась! Он такой по-хор…
custom 547202580814079969211custom 54744097640981813297
#дайджест для писателей и читателей от конца июля №11/2026 ⭐️ Как всегда — новые конкурсы в Великой Таблице (сам)Издата. 📖 События: 🪻 Литагенты объявили полуфиналистов своего последнего потока питчингов. Поздравляю всех, особенно моих знакомых Анну Бауэр и Николая Милова! 🪻 1 августа в Москве пройдет фестиваль Бомбора Арт — бесплатный праздник для всех, кто любит рисование, иллюстрацию и живопись. 🪻 9 августа в Мос…
custom 547440976409818132911custom 52538608569863786028custom 54720258081407996925
Мой соавтор Семён Чепурных всерьёз увлёкся вокалом и сочинением песен, и меньше чем за год круто шагнул вперёд — даже записал свою первую песню в студии! Прошу поддержки для дорогого друга ^_^ https://youtu.be/RzlpIboxfEg?si=jSAgwXtdFabuGoeG
custom 525363723092417795713custom 54744097640981813299custom 54720258081407996927
Призма Все мы — цвета осколки в палитре вселенской души. От рожденья сияя, даём мы и светим беспечно, Будто сила лучей в том пространстве времен бесконечна, И не видим опасность рассеяться в вечности тьмы. Мы находимся в поиске недостающих оттенков, Чтоб едиными с миром пустующим быть. Но в стремлении в белый свой свет превратить Забываем цвет истинный под оболочкою тленной. ______ 2013 #поэзия Стихотворение входит…
custom 54744097640981813299custom 54720258081407996924
Наконец-то сумела вырваться от ребёнка и забрать залежавшиеся на почте книги издательства «Лампочка»! Упаковано, как всегда, с душой 🥰 #книгиприходятвовремя
custom 547440976409818132917custom 54720258081407996925custom 52538584002650843012
«Комплексные числа» или Complex Numbers — один из наших с мужем любимых музыкальных проектов, и даже странно, что я раньше не упоминала его в блоге. Мне кажется, это уникальный проект, когда слушаешь его, ты как будто читаешь ушами старую добрую советскую фантастику. К примеру, альбом «Земное притяжение» — весь альбом по сути история некой цивилизации (а может, разных). Любимый трек — «Минбарский снег», пишут, что он…
custom 54720258081407996929custom 54744097640981813295custom 52538608569863786021
Я тут тредс наконец завела, там будут просто разные ежедневные мысли про все мои сферы жизни, так что если вы там есть, го дружить. https://www.threads.com/@darya.steel
custom 547202580814079969213
На самом деле большая проблема всех подобных проектов: даже если они способны закрыть реальные боли потребителей, потребителям как-то надо рассказывать о проекте. И с маркетингом у энтузиастов обычно всё плохо. Мне вот грустно смотреть на Навикнигатор, который потенциально крутой, но он даже в поисковике по названию не ищется... И внутри там что-то ничего не происходит, не заполняется сайт (я отправляла заявку на Кни…
custom 547440976409818132919
Сайт Литкритик (ИИ-работа с текстами) запускает второй проект — ЛитКарта. Пока там отображается демо-версия, но можно внести данные о себе и отправить на модерацию. Интересно потом посмотреть, сколько авторов будет и что дальше. По-хорошему нужно стимулировать потом как-то авторов на площадке писать друг другу, встречаться и делать комьюнити. Быть может, стоит сделать для такого на площадке чат, хотя бы приватный, ил…
custom 54720258081407996926custom 54744097640981813296custom 53818445945750239522
Отзыв на роман «Когда засияет Журавль» Лидии Платнер История неупокоенного духа обычной деревенской девушки, которая оказалась втянута в войну двух народов, обрела друзей среди врагов и едва не погубила мир. Есть битвы, которые не заканчиваются. Они длятся вечно, изнуряют и уничтожают. Эти битвы идут внутри нас. Нам можно или продолжать войну, или сдаться. Выбор всегда за нами. Это страшно. И порой больно, но… так у…
custom 547440976409818132913custom 54720258081407996928custom 52539352844746474242custom 53818445945750239521
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @steeldices. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 742,243 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Драконы, дайсы, Аркен-Хар. Дарья Сталь пишет” (@steeldices), 707 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/steeldices.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.