Для дачи или мероприятий?
👍3🎄1custom 53030956089936824761

Channel
@steeelbar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
270subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001868482931 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @steeelbar |
| Description | •Проектируем бары без ошибок •Собственное производство •Изготовление 10-25 р.д. •По заказу @steelbar_manager www.steel-bar.ru |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/steeelbar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 270 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 270 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 639 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
50 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 21 | 42.0% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 24.0% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5303095608993682476 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 4.00% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 4.00% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 2.00% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Для дачи или мероприятий?
👍3🎄1custom 53030956089936824761
🍸 Барная неделя России Главные новости и события недели для барменов, бар-менеджеров и владельцев заведений. Новости недели 1. Во вторник стартует полуфинал BarHub Competition 5 августа начинается полуфинальный этап одного из главных командных соревнований года. Двадцать сильнейших барных команд страны продолжат борьбу за выход в финал, который пройдет на BarHub Expo. В программе - командные испытания, работа с п…
🔥1
Барная неделя России 27 июля — 2 августа 2026 Что происходит в индустрии: В Москве выберут лучших барменов России 2 августа состоится всероссийский финал World Cocktail Championship 2026. Победители региональных отборов встретятся в категориях Best Profi и Flair Bartending. Два участника получат право представить Россию на мировом финале в Макао. Bar Hub Competition вышел в полуфинал Сегодня стартовал этап ТОП-20 …
🔥2
Новая статья в энциклопедии проектирования HoReCa. Как выбрать ледовый бункер для бара: объём, расположение и типичные ошибки. 🧊 В этой статье: Лёд - самый важный ингредиент бара, задача ледового бункера Как определить необходимый объём и где должен располагаться ледовый бункер 3 самые частые ошибки Инженерное решение STEELBAR Читаем тут: https://steel-bar.ru/blog/kak-vybrat-ledovyj-bunker
С Александром Глазуновым проектировали барную зону в новый проект группы «Теремок», ресторан на Тверской и на основе её новая статья в энциклопедию проектирования. Разработано совместно с @kalir_equip Читать тут: https://steel-bar.ru/blog/led-moyka-i-holodilniki
👍1
Бар может терять сотни тысяч в год из-за одной ошибки, которую не видно гостям Гость никогда не скажет: «У вас неудобно расположен ледогенератор». Но он почувствует последствия. Лишние 5-7 секунд на приготовление каждого коктейля в часы пик превращаются в длинную очередь, медленную отдачу и потерянные заказы. Поэтому хороший бар начинается не с выбора оборудования, а с ответов на три вопроса: • Какие напитки готов…
👍1🔥1
Абсолютная вся информация по высоте барной станции. Типичные ошибки, взгляд со стороны инженерной точки зрения и так как нужно. Читаем 📖 https://steel-bar.ru/blog/optimalnaya-vysota-barnoy-stancii/
👍1
Полное руководство по проектированию бара в новой статье в Энциклопедии проектирования https://steel-bar.ru/blog/kak-pravilno-sproektirovat-barnuyu-stanciyu
👍1
Почему стандартная барная станция - преимущество, а не ограничение. Когда сеть открывает второй, пятый или двадцатый ресторан, главной ценностью становится не уникальность каждого объекта, а скорость и предсказуемость запуска. Поэтому мы рекомендуем создавать стандарты, а не проектировать барную станцию с нуля для каждого нового заведения. Самый трудоемкий этап разработки - это создание полного комплекта производс…
👍2custom 53030956089936824761
После 16 лет работы Friends bar полностью обновился. Новый интерьер, новый стиль и новые барные станции и оборудование КАК STEELBAR И KALIR ПЕРЕПРОЕКТИРОВАЛИ СЕРДЦЕ ЛЕГЕНДАРНОГО Friends bar В НОВОСИБЕ Перед нами стояла задача создать рабочую линию для трёх сотрудников: двух барменов и сервис-бармена, который отвечает за напитки в зал Главная проблема старой станции была не во внешнем виде. через 22 минуты эксплуат…
🔥3
Новая научная работа в энциклопедии проектирования HoReCa https://steel-bar.ru/blog/rabochij-treugolnik-barmena
🔥3
Оставить заявку, ознакомиться с кейсами, посмотреть стандарты, почитать энциклопедию проектирования -> steel-bar.ru
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @steeelbar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 636,433 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“STEELBAR Проектирование баров” (@steeelbar), 270 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/steeelbar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.