Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

альбертка турбоящерка 005

@steeeeish

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

80subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002203515999
TypeChannel
Username@steeeeish
Descriptionдура лс: otsvssl анонимк: t.me/anonimmessangenew_bot?start=5282081216
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/steeeeish

Growth

809 Aug 2026, 00:46 — 80 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 18:48 — 80 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:469 Aug 2026, 18:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79–81 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 18:4880no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:4680first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 19 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
71
Videos
1
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

163 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52539495137012840621911.7%
custom 51882874223198473831710.4%
custom 52737782567204514501710.4%
custom 54381299004709474111710.4%
custom 5289710227451571461169.82%
custom 5361964951898443067159.20%
custom 5253768734232829470148.59%
custom 5271667434913291980137.98%
custom 5273843681957271809137.98%
custom 5195432358114782709106.13%
custom 519533613366748168363.68%
custom 525390140147763768131.84%
custom 527190761377945252021.23%
custom 536606230774915460510.613%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 15 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 11 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @steeeeish. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 February 2026 to 15 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Jun 2026, 20:48 UTC94 views16 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

вот вам лана дель рей

custom 536196495189844306715custom 53660623077491546051

13 Jun 2026, 09:33 UTC148 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

несерьезные прикольчики

custom 525394951370128406219

19 May 2026, 18:10 UTC198 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

зомби сухарик: год спустя

custom 525376873423282947014custom 52539014014776376813

25 Apr 2026, 20:23 UTC206 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

чуть чуть зомби чуть чуть

custom 527384368195727180913custom 52719076137794525202

4 Apr 2026, 23:19 UTC226 views16 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

это ден из мульта ден против приколитесь

custom 528971022745157146116

27 Mar 2026, 20:49 UTC784 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🐈🐈🐈🐈 крутые парни и девчонки оцените коллабу с егором (https://t.me/beazxqq) коллаба называется «ого брелоки»

custom 527377825672045145013custom 52716674349132919806

25 Mar 2026, 18:50 UTC189 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

такие приколы

custom 52716674349132919807custom 52737782567204514504

7 Mar 2026, 16:49 UTC254 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🐈🐈🐈🐈🐈

custom 51882874223198473838custom 54381299004709474113

26 Feb 2026, 17:25 UTC208 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 51882874223198473837custom 54381299004709474111

22 Feb 2026, 23:38 UTC254 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 дотянуться до солнца

custom 543812990047094741113custom 51882874223198473832

19 Feb 2026, 12:56 UTC211 views16 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

подписота зацените некий коллаб с лягушкоо https://t.me/+DOEV0SjLSA5lZTQ6 — лавр ряльн круто рисует

custom 519543235811478270910custom 51953361336674816836

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @steeeeish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 244,748 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“альбертка турбоящерка 005” (@steeeeish), 80 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/steeeeish.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.