Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Стартап Продюсер⚡️

@startupsproducer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,278subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001494155218
TypeChannel
Username@startupsproducer
DescriptionАрсений Васильев. Бывший во ВКонтакте, Додо и Где Шаверме. Делаю новый продукт. Пишу про создание стартапов, карьеру в айтишечке и еду. В лс - @arseny_vasilev
Created6 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/startupsproducer

Growth

1,2787 Aug 2026, 01:33 — 1,278 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:46 — 1,278 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:337 Aug 2026, 01:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,277–1,279 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 01:461,278no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:331,278first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
250
Videos
33
Links
105

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

397 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9724.4%
custom 52086730679784830228822.2%
😁8822.2%
7117.9%
custom 5325716862439283099123.02%
custom 5309882984466228650112.77%
custom 5375296873982604963112.77%
custom 5219872564569972166102.52%
custom 525610327229649993471.76%
💩10.252%
😢10.252%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 397reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @startupsproducer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 April 2026 to 12 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC373 views7 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Go-to-market — самое главное Расскажу как его раскачать за 2,5 часа. Вообще GTM на авось — это главный убийца усилий и стараний хороших людей, которые пытаются создать что-то новое. Разработать продукт и тыкаться с ним по разным каналам, ругаясь на стоимость трафика. Выйти в кучу стран в надежде, что где-то залетит. На этих граблях и сам стоял и на других смотрел. При этом GTM сложная дисциплина, требующая многоур

5💩1🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC431 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Супер гипер умная модель Fable в подписке Клода до 12-ого числа, дальше отдельно будут чарджить токены. В серой массе желающих успеть, че-то бахнуть с ней пока дают, я такой же серый и неприметный. Но нужна какая-то солидная задача под такую серьезную модельку, нашел их две для себя. В моем brain games приложении каждый день новые паззлы. При этом каждый уровень должен быть интересным для прохождения, иначе пользова

😁2custom 521987256456997216621

15 Jun 2026, 15:13 UTC692 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Навайбкодил на ДР (угадайте кого?) небольшую игрушку🎮 Надо прожить один день в тундре и пройти 4 мини-игры. Приключение минут на 15-20 в зависимости от вашей смекалки🧠 Можете проверить себя @tundra_one_day_bot Изначальный план был сделать за выходные, но в итоге ушло три дня. Плюс еще вечер, прошли по игре с дизайнеркой, чтобы было покрасивее и добавили музыку. Первый день делал графику и думал что вообще должно быт

🔥142custom 52198725645699721661

7 Jun 2026, 11:56 UTC824 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5208673067978483022105

31 May 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,000 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Поскольку застрял с бюрократией, сделал запуск на узкий круг мега-профессионалов, которые дают бесценный фидбек. Пока главный консерн связан со сложностью паззлов. Осознанно решил, что сложность паззлов должна быть миддл+. Если слишком просто, невесело возвращаться и играть снова, меня это смущает в текущих brain games прилках. Т.е. на долгий ретеншн имхо должно лучше работать с интересными паззлами. Да и приложение

custom 520867306797848302238custom 53257168624392830999

22 May 2026, 14:59 UTC886 views30 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Лучшее brain puzzles приложение Хотите верьте, хотите нет, но делаю офигенное приложение. Приложенек в жанре brain puzzles сотни: Lumosity, Elevate, Impulse, Peak, Neuronation и т.д. Их объединяют три вещи — иконка с силуэтом профиля, приложениям больше 10 лет, приоритет количества контента над качеством. Паззлов много и они разные, но когда за две минуты надо пройти 10 уровней, каждый паззл сам по себе неинтересны

🔥24😁3custom 52086730679784830223

21 May 2026, 15:15 UTC580 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чувствуешь, что тупеешь из-за частого использования ИИ? Это нормально, уже даже исследования подтверждают снижение когнитивных способностей при работе с ИИшкой (например от MIT). Ну ничего, скоро всех спасу лучшим в жанре brain puzzles приложением!

😁9🔥3

8 May 2026, 08:52 UTC792 views15 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Планирование говнирование Мудрость от Стива Джобса — самое главное в планировании, это ключевые 3-5 дел в ближайшие 18 часов. Я не гордый, мне хватит и 2-3. Отказался от любого другого планирования кроме сегодняшнего дня. Месячные, квартальные и годовые планы — это роскошь корпоративной жизни, когда можно пару месяцев в год этим заниматься. Осознав риск домашнего солопринерства, и что режим (не тот) быстро развалит

13custom 52198725645699721662

7 May 2026, 09:26 UTC672 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Иногда плачу по ночам, ведь еще в январе 24-ого в канале описывал концепцию Higgsfield. Сейчас это платформа номер один по созданию ИИ видеоконтента, ребята едут в Канны со своим ИИ фильмом и запускают платформу со своим контентом Higgsfield Original. На мой взгляд это самый мощный стартап на постсоветской территории. Ну а я вчера съел вкусный чебурек у Ларисы. Впрочем, тогда бы такой проект и не осилил. Даже из тек

custom 52561032722964999346😁42

2 May 2026, 09:58 UTC792 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Завезли вертикальные табы в хром. Еще лет 10, добавят переключения между пространствами и можно переезжать с Arc. Тем кто кайфует с табов сверху, напоминаю, что во всех других программах на компе у вас навигация слева. Notion, Figma, телега, редакторы кода, файловые менеджеры и пр. Зачем именно в браузере страдать?

custom 52198725645699721664

28 Apr 2026, 17:19 UTC976 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Траты на подписки Сейчас такой вайб, что если ты не тратишь на подписки и токены ИИшки хотя бы 200 баксов в месяц, то ты неэффективный петушара. Видимо в моем случае так и есть, но буду считать, что важно не сколько раз ударил молотком, а что построил. Вот мои траты: Чатжпт 20$. В подписку входит кодекс, с которым большинство моих запросов по кодингу удовлетворяются. Юзаю с его релиза, ни разу не упирался в лимиты.

🔥10custom 53752968739826049634custom 530988298446622865032

22 Apr 2026, 13:08 UTC747 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вчера поменял код руками, а не через ИИ-агента. Есть еще порох!

😁30🔥5custom 53098829844662286503

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @startupsproducer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 811,084 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Стартап Продюсер⚡️” (@startupsproducer), 1,278 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startupsproducer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.