Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for мекрюков: дизайн, продукты и эмоции

Channel

мекрюков: дизайн, продукты и эмоции

@emo_design

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,181subscribers

+60 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001528553344
TypeChannel
Username@emo_design
Descriptionдизайн директор. авторский канал про дизайн. 🅰️ Альфа-банк. Ранее был в додо пиццы и дринкит, яндексе, okko и дом.ру как арт-директор или дизайн-директор по всем вопросам — @mekryukov https://www.youtube.com/@mekryukov/videos
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/emo_design

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 23% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,1167,1957,155.56 August 2026 — 7,121 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,121 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,122 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,116 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,124 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,135 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,136 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,134 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,137 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,140 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,137 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,141 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,136 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,154 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,155 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,151 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,143 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,147 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,155 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,174 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,177 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,190 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,195 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,178 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,181 subscribers7,1816 August 202610 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 96 days, net +60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,104–7,207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 16:157,181+3
6 Nov 2026, 19:477,178-17
3 Nov 2026, 10:587,195+5
31 Oct 2026, 08:507,190+13
27 Oct 2026, 23:367,177+3
24 Oct 2026, 18:577,174+19
21 Oct 2026, 16:367,155+8
18 Oct 2026, 10:067,147+4
15 Oct 2026, 11:097,143-8
12 Oct 2026, 09:387,151-4
5 Oct 2026, 20:417,155+1
28 Sept 2026, 15:557,154+18
19 Sept 2026, 03:027,136-5
14 Sept 2026, 19:387,141+4
11 Sept 2026, 15:177,137-3
6 Sept 2026, 13:557,140+3
29 Aug 2026, 21:257,137+3
26 Aug 2026, 17:387,134-2
23 Aug 2026, 08:387,136+1
19 Aug 2026, 12:587,135first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.9%
avg views ÷ 7,181 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,080
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held22 (27 April 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total6,160
Reactions total139
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 17:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
180
Videos
127
Links
142

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
59s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,306 reactions across 22 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,38955.5%
🔥1,10225.6%
custom 52692490333182071152285.29%
💔1864.32%
💩1784.13%
👍1242.88%
👎441.02%
custom 5269360650928284477430.999%
custom 5219788039613594609120.279%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,306 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
165
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 22 we hold a reading for · 86%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @emo_design. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 April 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTC≈2,840 views79 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026
Video

Команда B2B 🅰️ Альфа-Банка Так получилось, что последние полгода мой фокус был на розничном бизнесе. Плюс погружение в целом в интересный мир финансов. Я вот узнал, чем накопительный счёт отличается от вклада (в 35 годиков, увы). Короче, фокус был в другом месте. А тут ребята смотрите, какую красоту раздают. Очень клёво наблюдать, когда команда делает такие истории сама и её прёт! И сейчас они в активном поиске диз…

🔥57❤19💩3

3 Nov 2026, 12:18 UTC≈3,320 views60 reactions11 Starsread 11 November 2026

А как надо работать играть? И так есть два пути, как я это вижу. Вот ты играешь в игру (вчера как раз играл в новую игру от моего бывшего CEO IT Арсения, который всё бросил и год вайбкодил приложение), и пока я проходил уровень с цифрами, словил себя на мысли: а я должен честно проходить, или я уже увидел рисунок и просто понимаю, где будет следующий белый кадр? Если упороться, то я нечестно сыграл, так как надо на…

❤39💩12🔥5👍4

12 Oct 2026, 15:12 UTC≈5,650 views172 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

В 2026 году потерять доступ к AI-инструменту — это больно. А точнее, сложно: очень быстро привыкаешь, когда рутинные задачки уже закидываешь в нейронку, чтобы подумать или написать пару вариантов согласно скиллам и правилам, которые у тебя настроены. А потом в один момент всё выключается, и ты понимаешь: капец. Не до конца понятно почему, но Anthropic меня заблокировал. Я написал в поддержку, но мою заявку рассматрив…

💔114❤35custom 521978803961359460912💩8👍3

24 Sept 2026, 14:11 UTC≈6,790 views182 reactions3 Starsread 11 November 2026

Все бегут за AI как за личным инструментом: у одного вайбкодинг-плагин, у другого свой пресет в Cursor, у третьего чат в ChatGPT, вылизанный под себя. В моменте выглядит как продуктивность. А по факту мы теряем главное — общий контекст команды. Дизайн — это командная работа! ❤️ Индивидуальный промптинг — это спорт одиночек как по мне. Один человек пишет отличный промпт, получает отличный результат, и всё, знание уми…

❤115🔥32custom 526924903331820711522👍6💩5👎2

15 Sept 2026, 08:14 UTC≈6,170 views191 reactions3 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Прошёл субботнюю конференцию Был на конференции от Т-банка. С одной стороны, увидел кучу прикольных ребят. С другой, пообщался с дизайн-директорами и прям из первых уст поделился, что думаю про процессы взаимодействия в индустрии. А индустрия, честно, страдает. Плюс многие AI используют как будто немного неправильно: как инструмент заколачивания, вместо того чтобы собрать всех за один общий стол. Но что было прям у…

🔥114❤57custom 526924903331820711516💩4

10 Sept 2026, 15:19 UTC≈6,550 views102 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

В субботу буду на конференции 🎤 В эту субботу я на конференции от ребят из т-банка. Будем играть в свою игру с командами из Т-Банка, Сбера (Митя, с днём рождения!), ВТБ и конечно, я из Альфы. Все, кто будет, приходите! Пообщаемся вживую. Узнаете, куда я пропал, что происходит и почему перестал писать. Увидите мои глаза, мой смех и всё такое 😄 https://producty24-ffdd2d.ru/

🔥59custom 526924903331820711520❤14💩6💔2👍1

30 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC≈8,510 views186 reactions4 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Главным может быть каждый. Лидером — нет! Прекрасные слова, рекомендую всем прочитать из поста Юли https://t.me/yulia_thoughts/258 🔥🔥🔥

❤124🔥29custom 526924903331820711517💩7👍6👎3

23 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC≈8,310 views310 reactions9 Starsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥171custom 526924903331820711571❤59💩7👍2

26 Jun 2026, 07:38 UTC≈10,300 views329 reactions8 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Есть один чувак 🇮🇸 Он основал дизайн-студию с $1000 на кухне. Вырастил её в агентство, которое делало продукты для Apple, Google, Airbnb, Uber, Facebook. Продал Twitter за огромные деньги и попросил заплатить ему как зарплату, не как capital gains. Чтобы заплатить максимальный налог. Просто потому что так правильно 😱😱😱 Его зовут Харальдур Торлейфссон. Или просто Халли. Он основатель студии Ueno, там в разное время …

❤236🔥59custom 526924903331820711534

25 Jun 2026, 08:24 UTC≈7,470 views109 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Дизайн — это про смыслы🕐 Как назовёшь корабль, так и поплывёшь. Слышали миллион раз. Это может быть кнопка в интерфейсе «На главную» или «Продолжить». А может быть про то, как назвать команду. Семья? Ой нет. Коллеги? Ну нет, мы же тут одно дело делаем. Команда? Да! Или Группировка, когда нужен быстрый дизрапт... Мой прекрасный близнец, который живёт и носит усы, сделал то, за что я люблю дизайн. Он основал своё аг…

❤59🔥18👍14💩13custom 52692490333182071155

19 Jun 2026, 15:06 UTC≈19,900 views200 reactions5 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ищу дизайнеров в Альфу! Много разных команд 🅰️ Пришло время 😍 У меня накопилось очень много открытых вакансий: и в разных продуктах внутри банка, и на вебе, и в мобайле. B2B, B2C, AI, инвест-направление... короче, запросов реально много, и они очень разные. Не буду перечислять всех ребят и каждую команду тут, иначе пост превратится в простыню. Но если коротко, вот что сейчас в работе: 1️⃣ Дизайнер в AI-команду Ал…

❤131🔥37custom 526924903331820711519💩8💔3👎2

18 Jun 2026, 14:05 UTC≈5,960 views118 reactions3 Starsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @OxParshikovVideo

Четыре лица одного банка В b2b нет «одного» пользователя. Есть предприниматель, бухгалтер, босс и фин эксперт с разными задачами, ритмами и отношением к банку. Один живёт возможностями и сделками, другой деталями и сверками, третий масштабом и рисками, четвёртый моделями и точностью. Мы сделали четыре темы под эти роли: Air для бухгалтера, Neo для предпринимателя, Ruby Wine для босса и Gentle Steel для финансиста.…

❤73🔥26💩12👍7

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @emo_design. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

fedor. insights
@fedorinsights · 31,671
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“мекрюков: дизайн, продукты и эмоции” (@emo_design), 7,181 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emo_design.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.