Channel
@startupcontent
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,953subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001018953061 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @startupcontent |
| Created | 20 February 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/startupcontent |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 3,953 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 3,951 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:20 | 3,954 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 3,954 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 April 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,723 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @startupcontent. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Навайбкодив прототип апки, яка навчить фото-композиції на практиці. Інструкція "як/що знімати" -> камера -> ШІ-фідбек. Якщо 2 фото успішні, то урок зарахований. Написав майже повністю з мобільного напряму на сервері за допомогою Codex. Вийдіть на прогулянку і спробуйте https://opryshok.com/18es
Топова розмова A16Z з Тревісом Каланіком, який колись створив Uber, а останні 8 років будував нову компанію у стелс-режимі https://youtu.be/z6gH_v0buUc?si=TlUQW_KSKAliTG8d
Серія коротких книжок від підприємця, який пройшов шлях $0 → $50K/mo → $0 і щодня писав нотатки https://alexwest.co
У Claude є програма для стартапів на безкоштовні ШІ-кредити https://claude.com/programs/startups
Photo, posted without a caption
Реальний шлях солоприємця довжиною 10 років https://meetfranz.com/blog/ten-years-of-franz
Пан описує свій досвід використання локальних ШІ-моделей. Каже, що все вже дуже добре працює на 2022 M2 Mac (64 GB RAM, 1TB storage) https://vickiboykis.com/2026/06/15/running-local-models-is-good-now/
Марк Лу написав про засвоєні уроки за 5 років — «32 принципи віральних продуктів» https://x.com/marclou/status/2065385672991752210
Апка на 25 мільйонів відтискань та 1 мільйонів доларів https://x.com/skyirezumi/status/2064464412652532074
Ми у Setapp з 2021 року і запустили там 4 апки. До травня 2026 вони працювали за підписочною моделлю, але зараз дозволяють ще й продавати апки за разовий платіж. Якщо у вас є макос апки, рекомендую https://x.com/Setapp/status/2057813008248627359
Зак нещодавно продав Cal AI і тепер знімає прикольне бізнес-шоу про свою наступну компанію https://youtu.be/nQVDi79A4JI
#реклама Мрієте про власний стартап, але лякає невідомість? Тримайте секрет: ідеального моменту для старту бізнесу не буде. Досвід тих, кому це вже вдалося, актуальні практики та прикрі помилки, яких можна уникнути — на курсі «Як запустити стартап в IT» від robot_dreams. За 18 занять ви навчитеся: – перевіряти ідею та попит до запуску – створювати MVP і тестувати гіпотези – будувати бізнес-модель і рахувати юніт-ек…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @startupcontent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 668,346 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стартап Левел” (@startupcontent), 3,953 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startupcontent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.